Senior Contributing Editors:
Jesus Diaz
| AIM | Twitter
Mark Wilson, Reviews
| AIM | Twitter
Contributing Editors:
Matt Buchanan | AIM | Twitter
Adam Frucci | Twitter
Sean Fallon | Twitter
Jack Loftus | Twitter
John Herrman | Twitter
Dan Nosowitz
Chris Mascari
Danny Allen | Twitter
Rosa Golijan | Twitter
Chris Jacob
My guess is that anyone who paid for the mid to low range Macbook Pros would not have spent enough money to get the i(whichever) option, much like the iMac. This is just a guess, but I don't suppose the C2D will just go away. The i5/i7 will probably start off being the tipety-top 15" and 17", if not just the 17" by itself, so don't feel too bad, all you folks that spent at or below $2k, at least not yet :P
At the very least, the nicer C2D procs in the top end models will get pushed to the lower orders for the same money in their respective tiers.
The MacBook Pro is likely to be updated in February, based on history and the fact that it's always wise to wait for kinks in manufacturing to be knocked out during the first production runs of chips.
I knew there was a reason I was holding out on buying a new laptop. Hopefully the Core i5s will make it into a slew of laptops at a reasonable price. They're worth it for their decreased power consumption and heat alone, the increase in power via speed or hyperthreading is just an added benefit.
That said, does OS X take advantage of hyperthreading yet?
@Nathan Obbards: According to the iMac core i7 Benchmarks ([gizmodo.com]) Mac OSX is doing pretty well with multi- and hyperthreading.
Other apps don´t benefit that much.
Well, technically speaking, the FCC only issued a notice looking for database administrators, so we are still a bit of a ways off from seeing a functional database (or actual TV whitespace products). The comment cycle on the proposals doesn't wind up until late Feb., so best case for a decision actually appointing an administrator is probably summer, and it will take some time for the administrator to actually open its doors for business... So... don't hold your breath.
The 's' is for a more efficient processor (usually slightly underclocked). They run cooler (and therefore quieter) and are used mainly in slimline and HTPC models.
What's up with the codenames? I don't want my computer powered by a Bloomfield, I want it powered by a Desert Storm or something cool sounding like that.
I think Apple just rather pay exclusiveness for their chips to avoid the hackintosh situation.
I do wish this isn't truth, for hackintosh is doing a heaps of promotion of OSX amongst the geeks, And could be the best way to make people convert to the mac enviroment.
@ridgecity: I dont think Intel would want to restrict its CPUs like that. ATM apple does have exclusive CPUs at launch before the other cos get them in a couple of months.
If they hate hackintoshing they can always bring back the power pc lol!
Oh no! Are you quite sure? Marked with an "S", no less? It does portend rather ominously, does it not? I think I will have to sit down and have a cup of tea on this startling revelation!
It's a bit of a letdown on the gulftown, but it could just as easily be the case that they're simply already "reserved" by Apple.
there had better be some good deals when the Windows 7 RC starts shutting down. It's so much easier to just buy a new laptop than deal with an OS install.
are they going to fit into i7 motherboards?are there going to be like the i5 ones that had motherboards for themselves but supported i7s too but in other format?and if yes.are the i9s worth buying?i mean if a new ones comes next year that needs a new motherboard to operate then i'm going to be very sad for stepping from my core 2 duo 2.4ghz prossecor
12/01/09
12/01/09
You just know Jobs is going to smirk after saying that on stage.
PS - I'm getting that i7 on 17" MacBook Pro, or else.
12/01/09
At the very least, the nicer C2D procs in the top end models will get pushed to the lower orders for the same money in their respective tiers.
12/01/09
12/01/09
Sadly we are right before the USB 3.0 or Lightpeak versions (probably in a year), but I can't wait any longer.
12/01/09
12/01/09
That said, does OS X take advantage of hyperthreading yet?
12/01/09
12/01/09
Other apps don´t benefit that much.
12/01/09
@Nintenboy01: I thought some of the i5s had hyperthreading, just not all of them.
12/01/09
12/01/09
11/29/09
11/29/09
11/29/09
11/29/09
11/29/09
11/29/09
11/29/09
11/29/09
11/29/09
11/29/09
I do wish this isn't truth, for hackintosh is doing a heaps of promotion of OSX amongst the geeks, And could be the best way to make people convert to the mac enviroment.
11/29/09
If they hate hackintoshing they can always bring back the power pc lol!
11/29/09
It's a bit of a letdown on the gulftown, but it could just as easily be the case that they're simply already "reserved" by Apple.
11/29/09
11/29/09
11/23/09
11/23/09
11/23/09