@met2art: Thank the Lord I'm not the only one - first thought that I had when I read the headline "Oh, so we're living in William Gibson's future now?".
hardly a design philosophy, i mean all they do is skin over existing operating systems, and while im in favour of their efforts for andriod, im not to sure about winMO, winMo is crap, it will always be crap, and its design despite this 6.5/7.0 rehash is still crap, all touchflo3d does is slow down the ram and add another variable for the device to freeze up on. plus the above photos look more like touchflo than sense
@exekias: TouchFlo isn't any slower than the standard WinMo interface. If it is for you, it's because the carrier has loaded your phone up with useless stuff that's slowing it down. Update your ROM and turn off your background apps.
I really don't get why MS doesn't just skip 6.5 and go straight to 7. No one is going to give a crap about your phone if it still needs a stylus in 2010. The colors aren't as sharp on a resistive screen. The quality seems cheaper. And everyone hates/looses stylus's. Don't release another build until you drop the stylus. Apple, Google, Palm, RIM have dropped it and aren't looking back. Your market share and your legacy apps aren't exactly huge. No excuses. Put WinMo back in the oven for a while, and don't take it out until it's 100% compatible with capacitive touch screens.
@dallasmay2: Funny, I've had the same stylus for my Dell X30 PDA since about 2003 (runs WM2003SE) and typically I only need it to enter a lot of text on-screen. I can do a lot of screen navigation without touching the screen at all, too. It just works.
I beta-tested this program back in July and August of last year. I ran it on a near factory-fresh Sony VAIO Core2Duo with 2.1 GHz T8100 processors, 3GB of system memory and 1GB of video RAM on an NVidia 8400 GS chip. My system was running Vista Small Business (x86).
Bumptop ran poorly and drained system resources. It certainly ran nowhere as well as in the videos. There was simply no benefit to be gained from it. I have no interest in trying it based on what I saw of it.
I'd rather see a quality product like CubeDesktop get integrated into Win7.
@OMG! Ponies!: it's a little unfair to judge it from a beta test you did almost a year ago.
That said, from what I've seen on this video, I'm not all that inclined to try it myself. It's got a "gee-whiz" factor but I don't think it would be that useful for me, especially since I don't have a touchscreen computer. Maybe when I get that 37" touchscreen easel-style PC in 2014, it'll come in handy...
This has serious potential. I'm tired of smudges on my screen, and when I'm playing space monkey my own hand occasionally obscures my view and makes me miss that oh-so-precious space garbage.
11/18/09
11/18/09
11/18/09
I can see it now, like a two player version of Moon Patrol. Just try and jump my craters!
11/18/09
11/18/09
11/18/09
11/18/09
Take this concept, enlarge it to 24" by 18", build it as a seat cushion, and make it react to flatulence.
For the pro-user, build a 32" by 20" "16:10 Widescreen" model, and make the underside of the ferrofluid seat cushion reactive to Cheetos dust.
You're welcome, Microsoft Research Labs.
11/18/09
So.... put a hole in it?
08/23/09
08/24/09
08/23/09
08/10/09
08/10/09
04/08/09
04/08/09
04/08/09
04/08/09
04/08/09
From 2006:
TED presentation from 2007: [www.ted.com]
04/08/09
Bumptop ran poorly and drained system resources. It certainly ran nowhere as well as in the videos. There was simply no benefit to be gained from it. I have no interest in trying it based on what I saw of it.
I'd rather see a quality product like CubeDesktop get integrated into Win7.
04/08/09
That said, from what I've seen on this video, I'm not all that inclined to try it myself. It's got a "gee-whiz" factor but I don't think it would be that useful for me, especially since I don't have a touchscreen computer. Maybe when I get that 37" touchscreen easel-style PC in 2014, it'll come in handy...
11/21/08
11/21/08