Enter your username and password.
Tip your editors:
Editorial Director:
Brian Lam | | Twitter
Editor:
Jason Chen
| AIM | Twitter
Features Editor:
Wilson Rothman
| Twitter
Senior Contributing Editors:
Jesus Diaz
| AIM | Twitter
Mark Wilson, Reviews
| AIM | Twitter
Contributing Editors:
Matt Buchanan
| AIM | Twitter
Adam Frucci
| Twitter
Sean Fallon
| Twitter
Jack Loftus
| Twitter
John Herrman
| Twitter
Dan Nosowitz
Chris Mascari
Danny Allen
| Twitter
Rosa Golijan
| Twitter
Chris Jacob
Columnist:
Brendan I. Koerner
Interns:
Don Nguyen
Kyle VanHemert
Comment Intern:
Nick Ellenoff |
Comment Account Questions:
Please enter your email address to have your password reset.
Registering will give you a user profile and the ability to add other users as friends. To become a commenter, however, you need to audition.
Want to know more? Consult the Comment FAQ and legal terms.
You don't need to login to comment. Just enter your email address below.
See how your address will be displayed in the Comment FAQ.
11/16/09
11/16/09
11/16/09
11/17/09
Thankfully, that was a long time ago, and it has all worked out since then. #googleinterview
11/16/09
11/16/09
How many gallons of Mr. Clean would it take to shine every floor in the Google HQ?
11/16/09
11/16/09
Hey, I bet even Google 'Sanitation Specialists' get the free grub... #googleinterview
11/16/09
11/16/09
11/16/09
11/16/09
I should be hired by Google to be in charge of girls. #googleinterview
11/16/09
11/16/09
11/16/09
11/16/09
11/16/09
11/16/09
I'll just take my hundred page investment document crammed full of numbers and legalese and have two days to come back and explain it. #googleinterview
11/16/09
11/16/09
11/16/09
11/16/09
11/16/09
11/16/09
I wonder if you can just have your computer ready when they call and google whatever they ask you. But I think they're actually more interested in how you get to your answer than the actual answers. #googleinterview
11/16/09
11/16/09
11/16/09
11/16/09
11/16/09
You mean the advertisers? I think Google employees. #googleinterview
11/13/09
[www.ted.com]
This talk was from last year but outlines that kind of work which Venter is involved in. It is relevant to this post on synthetic biology.
11/13/09
As for the possibility of destroying the Earth...early on some scientists were convinced that a nuclear detonation would incinerate all the atmosphere of Earth, they detonated the devices anyway.
As for can we destroy mankind with a virus....hat just comes down to Hubris. We believe we are great and powerful, and we are taking our first steps to being so....but we are not all powerful.
We need to get over our scared kid locked in a dark closet phase with biotech. We are moving towards a better world... I want it to happen.
11/13/09
11/13/09
11/13/09
Specter is correct to point out the groups silliness in attempting to ban this or that, but then it totally flies over his head that maybe the ACTUAL problem is that we permit this to be a political decision at all. THAT is irrational in my point. If party A and party B want to do business with each other and they agree to the terms, then what the hell right does some party C have to say "no you're not allowed to do that". Even going past the fact that for C to even be able to make that case he must assume to have some sort of property right over the persons A or B (since he is in fact telling them what they can and cannot do with their property, thus inferring an ownership power), what the hell makes party C so special that they should have that authority? Are they super beings who have some magical ability to say that some market exchange is "wrong"?
Perhaps the answer should be to get the government out of scientific research entirely, and instead just give back that tax money and let individuals fund what they want. then the only question to ask would be "ok, who owns this?" "they do?" "ok then, it is their decision". End of story. #syntheticbiology
11/13/09