• Gizmodo
  • bestmodo
  • lifehacker
  • kotaku
  • Profile logout login

#iphonenanocase

Gizmodo

Share Cancel
   
Upload an image | Add an image URL
×

logging in
  • FAQ. Include # before tag:
  • #tips,
  • #dealzmodo,
  • #rumors,
  • #broken,
  • #iphoneapps,
  • #apple,
  • etc.

New York, 4:08 AM
Tue Nov 10
54 posts in the last 24 hours

FR | IT | DE | SP | JP | AU | BR

Gizmodo Team

Tip your editors:
tips@gizmodo.com

Editorial Director:
Brian Lam | Email | Twitter

Editor:
Jason Chen
Email | AIM | Twitter

Features Editor:
Wilson Rothman
Email | Twitter

Senior Contributing Editor:
Jesus Diaz
Email | AIM | Twitter
Mark Wilson, Reviews
Email | AIM | Twitter

Contributing Editors:
Matt Buchanan
Email | AIM | Twitter
Adam Frucci
Email | Twitter
Sean Fallon
Email | Twitter
Jack Loftus
Email | Twitter
John Herrman
Email | Twitter
Dan Nosowitz
Email
Chris Mascari
Email
Danny Allen
Email | Twitter

Columnist:
Brendan I. Koerner

Interns:
Don Nguyen
Email
Chris Jacob
Email

Comment Intern:
Nick Ellenoff | Email

Heroes and Friends

Comment Account Questions:
Comments@gizmodo.com

SUBSCRIBE TO Gizmodo RSS

New: Breaking news and daily top stories via email
9515 Subscribers
Gizmodo
  • posts about #iphonenanocase more →

    iPhone Nano Case Product Page, Product Pics Shown Off By XSKN

    Did XSKN Leak the New iPhone, Again? (We Doubt It)
  • Your version of Internet Explorer is not supported. Please upgrade to the most recent version in order to view comments.
    Dsmvwl  Admin  Promote to frontpage Approve user Ban user ×
    Image of strattonboarder strattonboarder
    12/23/08

    In reply to iPhone Nano Case Product Page, Product Pics Shown Off By XSKN
    If there were no other reason to be skeptical, would they really both have 3G? I would expect that to be a defining separation between the two models, with the nano relegated to the badwidth depths of edge....
     Reply
    strattonboarder was starred strattonboarder was unstarred
    Image of Kaiser-Machead Kaiser-Machead
    12/23/08

    @strattonboarder: If the device is that much smaller, I don't think differences in bandwidth capability would be needed as a defining separation.
     Reply
    Kaiser-Machead was starred Kaiser-Machead was unstarred
    Image of Kaiser-Machead Kaiser-Machead
    12/23/08

    In reply to iPhone Nano Case Product Page, Product Pics Shown Off By XSKN
    For those who want the storage capacity of the iPod touch and so forth, this would be a nice phone to have. The current iPhone would be redundant.
     Reply
    Kaiser-Machead was starred Kaiser-Machead was unstarred
    Image of TheSonOfKrypton TheSonOfKrypton
    12/23/08

    In reply to iPhone Nano Case Product Page, Product Pics Shown Off By XSKN
    Straight up....This is stupid Apple....STUPID! WTF? You already make a phone, then you make an SDK....Programs MADE with the SDK have so far fit only one resolution b/w the iPhone and iPod Touch....NOW, you introduce a smaller iPhone? WTF? I can't wait to see how you reconcile the resolution differences b/w iPhone/iPod Touch and iPhone nano. Not to mention, who the fuck would want to fuck around with a screen that small? This is just stupid.
     Reply
    TheSonOfKrypton was starred TheSonOfKrypton was unstarred
    Image of Graverobber Graverobber
    12/23/08

    @TheSonOfKrypton: Apple has been working on Resolution Independence for OSX for some time now, but hasn't realized this in a release version. Perhaps this is intended to be that debut.
     Reply
    Graverobber was starred Graverobber was unstarred
    Image of yoshi yoshi
    12/15/08

    In reply to Did XSKN Leak the New iPhone, Again? (We Doubt It)
    Seems kind of small but I will leave it up to Apple to convince me otherwise if it's true.


    I think Apple has learned its lesson so I can't imagine it not having 3G.


    I wish that Apple would create an iPod Touch with 3G data connection only. I could see tons of people buying a Touch with 3G paying $30 a month for unlimited internet.


    Several people from Gizmodo laughed at the idea when I mentioned it to them. :)


    I hope to prove them wrong one day...

     Reply
    yoshi was starred yoshi was unstarred
    Image of jdmstar jdmstar
    12/15/08

    In reply to Did XSKN Leak the New iPhone, Again? (We Doubt It)
    What the deuce? An iphone with no 3g is like watching porn with no lube it just doesnt make sense. So now you have to run around with a small phone and expect to use the EDGE service which sucks donkey gonads plus attaching to whatever WIFI you find for free like crabs on a dirty va jay jay.. pfft.
     Reply
    jdmstar was starred jdmstar was unstarred
    Image of Kaiser-Machead Kaiser-Machead
    12/15/08

    @jdmstar: They're not Alaskan king, but they feel huge.
     Reply
    Kaiser-Machead was starred Kaiser-Machead was unstarred
    Image of Kaiser-Machead Kaiser-Machead
    12/15/08

    In reply to Did XSKN Leak the New iPhone, Again? (We Doubt It)
    This would still have a wider surface area than my SE W810, but likely a bit thinner and about the same height. That's not comically small. There are cell phones that are way Lilliputian.
     Reply
    Kaiser-Machead was starred Kaiser-Machead was unstarred
    Image of Jrsy Devil's Advocate® Jrsy Devil's Advocate®
    12/15/08

    In reply to Did XSKN Leak the New iPhone, Again? (We Doubt It)
    OOh.. this must be the Wal-Mart iphone.
     Reply
    Jrsy Devil's Advocate® was starred Jrsy Devil's Advocate® was unstarred
    Image of OGHowie OGHowie
    12/15/08

    In reply to Did XSKN Leak the New iPhone, Again? (We Doubt It)
    Perfect size for Elementary and Middle School kids....
     Reply
    OGHowie was starred OGHowie was unstarred
    Image of IN THE FACE! IN THE FACE!
    12/15/08

    @OGHowie: Next they will release the iPhone iNutero so you can stay in touch with your unborn child. :P
     Reply
    IN THE FACE! was starred IN THE FACE! was unstarred
    Image of wasting_company_time wasting_company_time
    12/15/08

    In reply to Did XSKN Leak the New iPhone, Again? (We Doubt It)
    even if it is true, I don't want it.
     Reply
    wasting_company_time was starred wasting_company_time was unstarred
    Image of IN THE FACE! IN THE FACE!
    12/15/08

    @mares: Hrm... I find this interesting (which is significant coming from a certified mac hater), if they end up selling this like a iPod (unlocked from the factory w/out contract and a reasonable carrier-un-subsidized price) I could see this being quite an attractive value proposition. (A great item to buy your less than uber-tech-savvy girlfriend/parents/etc.)
     Reply
    IN THE FACE! was starred IN THE FACE! was unstarred
    Earlier threads | All threads | Show hidden threads | Show featured threads only | Start a new discussion

Login

Enter your username and password.

Please enter a username.
Please enter your password.
logging in
Login via Facebook | Sign Up | Forgot Password?

Reset Password

Please enter your email address to have your password reset.

Please enter your email address.
Please enter a valid email address.
requesting password reset

Register

Registering will give you a user profile and the ability to add other users as friends. To become a commenter, however, you need to audition.

Want to know more? Consult the Comment FAQ and legal terms.

Please enter a username.
Please enter a password.
Please confirm your password.
Passwords are not identical.
Please enter a valid email address.
registration sent, waiting for reply

Submit Your Comment

You don't need to login to comment. Just enter your email address below.

See how your address will be displayed in the Comment FAQ.

Please enter a valid email address.
Please enter a valid email address.
logging in

Login with your Facebook or Gizmodo account.

Sign up here.



  • Archives
  • About
  • Advertising
  • Legal
  • Help
  • Report a Bug
  • FAQ
Original material is licensed under a Creative Commons License permitting non-commercial sharing with attribution.