Enter your username and password.
Tip your editors:
tips@gizmodo.com
Editorial Director:
Brian Lam | Email | Twitter
Editor:
Jason Chen
Email | AIM | Twitter
Features Editor:
Wilson Rothman
Email | Twitter
Senior Contributing Editor:
Jesus Diaz
Email | AIM | Twitter
Mark Wilson, Reviews
Email | AIM | Twitter
Contributing Editors:
Matt Buchanan
Email | AIM | Twitter
Adam Frucci
Email | Twitter
Sean Fallon
Email | Twitter
Jack Loftus
Email | Twitter
John Herrman
Email | Twitter
Dan Nosowitz
Email
Chris Mascari
Email
Danny Allen
Email | Twitter
Columnist:
Brendan I. Koerner
Interns:
Don Nguyen
Email
Chris Jacob
Email
Comment Intern:
Nick Ellenoff | Email
Comment Account Questions:
Comments@gizmodo.com
Please enter your email address to have your password reset.
Registering will give you a user profile and the ability to add other users as friends. To become a commenter, however, you need to audition.
Want to know more? Consult the Comment FAQ and legal terms.
You don't need to login to comment. Just enter your email address below.
See how your address will be displayed in the Comment FAQ.
11/13/09
Also, can one of the Gizmodo Powers That Be(tm) remove these spam posts in red from "pengzi1990"? #theweekiniphoneapps
11/13/09
11/13/09
11/13/09
11/13/09
11/13/09
11/13/09
11/13/09
11/13/09
11/13/09
keyboards on phones are old hat. for years my most hated thing about mobile phones were the cheap horrible keyboards where the keys fell off after six months #xkcd
11/13/09
11/13/09
11/13/09
11/13/09
11/13/09
People wine and complain about "crass commercialism" but then go out and engage right in it.
The truth is that the level of consumerism a human being engages in is totally up to him. He can choose to waste his money on that sort of stuff, or he can choose to invest it and instead go out and take a nice walk in the woods.
And really what is SO bad about crass commercialism anyway? People seem to be of the opinion that if there were not mass commercialism they would be living some sort of idyllic life?
News flash people, if you did not have the spirit to make new things then you would likely be dead, because the only reason that most human beings are alive on this planet is because of all this technology that we have today. The only reason that commercialism is "crass" is because by-in-large human beings are crass. Think about it, businesses only sell what you are willing to buy, if the crap you buy is crass well guess what? Businesses are gonna keep selling you that. End. Rant. #xkcd
11/13/09
11/13/09
11/13/09
I suppose that should teach us that sometimes, senseless arguments aren't worth our time. That you can't engage someone you don't think is worth your argument and ignore them at the same time. Perhaps the best way to deal with something you find either ignorant, obnoxious, or obvious flamebait is to ignore it, because really, engaging in endless debates and back-and-forths over which handset is better....surely it's even more vain than the lust after the gadget itself, is it not? Can I not at least let the fleeting happiness I get from using my gadget be enough? Do I need to spend valuable, precious, time and energy trying (usually in vain) to convince others to do so as well? Is there nothing better to do with my time?
Except...they're wrong!! On the internet!! #xkcd
11/13/09
11/13/09
11/13/09
11/13/09
11/13/09
11/13/09
11/13/09
11/13/09
11/13/09
11/13/09
11/13/09
To claim that they released the same product in 3 years is a tad disingenuous. #smartphonemarketshare
11/14/09
oh, and to claim that apple DID release a new product every year, id have to say is a "tad disingenuous." #smartphonemarketshare
11/13/09
Apple, on the other hand, is going to have serious competition in the years ahead from Android.
In any case, it is neat to see the market shifting so dramatically in such a relatively short period of time. #smartphonemarketshare
11/13/09
11/13/09
11/13/09
11/13/09
My dissatisfaction with BB led me to use a Korean made WinMo phone and it's surprisingly good (for business aplications, and a few other things).... compared to RIM.... what nightmare they were. #smartphonemarketshare
11/13/09
1. Apple made it seem their device locally encrypted information and never told anyone that it did not.
2. Apple lied to Exchange Servers saying it was locally encrypting the data when it was not.
(FYI: These two lies put corporations in litigation peril since they are held to confidentiality agreements and encryption standards, such as national HIPAA regulations. In other words - major problem.)
3. Apple released a patch that was an insignificant fix for problems that "fixed" this little white lie.
4. That "fix" that was not communicated broke all earlier iPhones from being able to connect to properly configured Exchange 2007 servers.
5. Tech departments from all over the world received countless trouble tickets saying their iPhones no longer worked and blamed it on the corporation, not their beloved company in Cupertino.
6. After getting the facts, companies everywhere started denying access to email data (for obvious reasons) to any iPhone devices, many setting it as company policy.
Oh, sure, there are other problems, too - like being able to control what functions of the iPhone are available to staff - being able to remotely destory the data (corporate necessity), being able to push out applications to each device, etc and so on.
I could go on, but you get the idea.. The iPhone is not a corporate device. Not yet, at least, and given the track record, probably not for a long time. #smartphonemarketshare
11/13/09
11/13/09
It's clear to me that the color orange is the real looser in this graph. It's sooo "last year". And everybody knows that Red is the new Orange.
Android may need to spread it's legs to get a little more of the market share but Nokia will have to bend over for that to happen. Everything else is rising faster than a thrill up Chris Mathews leg. #smartphonemarketshare
11/13/09
11/13/09
11/13/09
11/13/09
11/13/09
11/13/09
11/13/09