Gizmodo 
Enter your username and password.
Tip your editors:
tips@gizmodo.com
Editorial Director:
Brian Lam | Email | Twitter
Editor:
Jason Chen
Email | AIM | Twitter
Features Editor:
Wilson Rothman
Email | Twitter
Senior Contributing Editors:
Jesus Diaz
Email | AIM | Twitter
Mark Wilson, Reviews
Email | AIM | Twitter
Contributing Editors:
Matt Buchanan
Email | AIM | Twitter
Adam Frucci
Email | Twitter
Sean Fallon
Email | Twitter
Jack Loftus
Email | Twitter
John Herrman
Email | Twitter
Dan Nosowitz
Email
Chris Mascari
Email
Danny Allen
Email | Twitter
Rosa Golijan
Email | Twitter
Chris Jacob
Email
Columnist:
Brendan I. Koerner
Interns:
Don Nguyen
Email
Kyle VanHemert
Email
Comment Intern:
Nick Ellenoff | Email
Comment Account Questions:
Comments@gizmodo.com
Original material is licensed under a Creative Commons License permitting non-commercial sharing with attribution.
10/02/09
10/02/09
It all depends on the developer. Its their choice on if they want to release a lite version and the features the lite version has.
10/02/09
Have you tested this app? How quickly in comparison the iPhone app does it load and can you please include this in all future camera app tests please and thankyou!
10/02/09
08/31/09
Come on!! this service may have helped a few but not millions!!
you can do exact same stuff with GOOGLE!
I bet all this is gonna bite Apple back one day.
08/31/09
08/31/09
/s
07/31/09
07/30/09
07/30/09
07/30/09
07/30/09
07/30/09
07/30/09
07/30/09
07/30/09
discount w/ mac or iphone purchase: $69 initially, $99/yr thereafter.
07/29/09
When you really think about that. Beyond the scope of free SMS, it can almost make some sort of sense, But Google latitude? i don't get it.
07/29/09
07/29/09
And what about hunger in Asia? Or hunger in the US, for that matter?
07/29/09
07/29/09
07/29/09
That being said, Apple's App Store craptastic policies, while in this instance affect a (CURRENTLY) American-based service, affect all iPhone users, not just American.
07/29/09
07/29/09
Enjoy the multi touch tyranny.
07/29/09
07/29/09
Seriously, do you think bitching about it on a blog is going to change anything? I had the original iPhone, and yes, I will agree 100% that it's the most elegant/advanced/user friendly "smart" phone I've used. Having said that, the company that controls it is a steaming pile of nazi shit! And you all know this... yet you continue to buy their products and support them. Only to later bitch about what you already knew would happen. Apple does not like innovation unless it comes from them so they can control it and you.
Android is where sanctuary lies. After about the 4th or 5th time jailbreaking my iPhone, I swore up and down that I had enough of apple and its nazi ways. I sold it on craigslist and moved onto the G1. I haven't looked back since. Not once have I regretted that decision. Yes, the iPhone is beautiful piece of tech. But what good is the tech if the OS on it is only for people who need things spoon fed to them like an iBaby?
Do yourselves a favor. Sell your iPhones... and go to Android. You will thank me when you never ever have to worry about jailbreaking your phone everytime a new OS is released.
07/29/09
Meaning it really isn't as great as you make it out to be as an open source community is dependent on the support it gets.
Don't get me wrong that isn't an issue with Android itself but what people focus on (as in people, devs, etc). As it is it looks like you just got a Facebook app after how long? That's not to say I realyl care about Facebook, but merely pointing out how long it took to come out with an official app.
It could be Android is just maturing and taking a while but so far I really dont see a phone to compete with the iphone overall with games, storage, capacity, elegance (as you say) etc all together. I know there are many phones that may say beat the iphone in 1 or two features but generally not all around (i.e. t.he palm pre can multitask but there is only an 8 gig model)
07/29/09
07/29/09
07/30/09
07/29/09
so, don't complain...
07/29/09
07/29/09
"Slightly constrained?" Like, you mean, somewhere where it might be useful aka "not at home?"
07/29/09
Even if there was pressure from AT&T, it's still Apple's fault. It's their fault that they are the sole legitimate provider for application content. It's their fault jailbreaking is disallowed by their own ToS and EULA. With all of the other platforms, even where there are official distribution networks, there are ways provided to sideload applications obtained from anywhere. If I've got an Android phone, I can install Apps Google's never even heard of, let alone approved. Same with BlackBerry, Symbian, or WinMo.
Then there's the idea that this is the first time Apple's policies have hurt consumers. If that was the case then you wouldn't have had to write that article last year. This is just the latest, most high profile, case.