Now that's what I've been waiting for. Except I didn't wait, and bought a Dell 2409 last month. Oh well, hopefully in a year these'll be 24+ inches and $200 and I'll buy one then. #dellsx2210t
@Brian Richards: Mmm. $470 is a little higher than I would spend, especially when you consider the all-in-one touch computers start around $800. But if it's multi-touch and all that, it might be worth it. #dellsx2210t
@Brian Richards: Huh... that also confirms that it's multi-touch. Cool. Also, why does the article say "We assume the system is IR-based (meaning it's limited to 2 simultaneous touch points)"? Isn't surface also IR based? And it works with 50 points, along with continuous surfaces? #dellsx2210t
Surely you just put a big fuck-off electro-magnet at the door of the theater? Tell people with pace makers they can't watch movies and simply fry all electronics as you enter/exit.
At least we can reduce the prirate community to only old people with fuddy hearts.
@All Your Base Are Belong To Us:
Yup because clearly every piece of electronics are devilish pirating devices! Hark! What is that!? A phone? EVIL! A DS? BLASPHEMY! Your watch? HERESY!
@ZaxxonQ.com: Maybe because you would have realized that it's a useless product that preys on the ignorance of industry executives who are dumb as fuck, and that it will only be a long-term detriment to the movie-going public?
@met2art has an invisible star: I hear the studios' next anti piracy plan is to make movies longer than videotapes so strategically placed personell in the theatres can hear the pirates 'reloading' and catch the culprits in the act. I am guessing it won't be until 2012 or so that they discover that people are using digital video cameras.
@ssoltero: They vex you? They vex-.....You are vexed by these movies? Camcorder rips of theatrical movies are vexing?
Hey guys, listen up! This has gone too far! Time and time again, Big Content has locked down our media, or implemented inconvenient methods of protecting their content. But now, a person has actually been VEXED by these counter-piracy measures. This has gone too far!
How many more people need to be VEXED before we stand up and say, "No more!" We cannot allow vexation to continue in America. We have to resist the vexers, wherever they may attack us!
The same people who watch cams are the same people who are willing to watch a movie on their psp, zune or iphone. The quality isn't a priority. It's just some cheap entertainment.
@TiffanyHaoiet: Not quite. People who like to watch movies on their PSP, Zune or iPhone may find cams just as unacceptable as those who only watch movies on their home theaters. With a proper solid source format, watching on any of those three is vastly superior in image and sound quality, even if the dimensions are limiting.
I don't watch cams, but I watch things on my iTouch.
If I'm watching a downloaded video @ home - I care about quality.
If I'm watching a downloaded video on my iTouch, it's because I'm on a train/bus/traveling and want entertainment. However, I still care about quality to some extent - I wouldn't watch a cam-rip on my iTouch. But, I'm not that concerned if the source material was high-def or not.
Apparently they haven't heard of IR filters. They're going to waste who knows how many millions on R&D for this only to be utterly thwarted by a $10 lens filter. FAIL.
@Kaiser-Machead: Initially, till the R5 release. Still I don't see how this will stop anything.
A lot of groups/individuals patch together releases from multiple sources to get the best quality they can. So the picture might be a cropped cam from Russia, but the audio might be from a cam taken in America.
A lot of theaters worldwide won't even bother to use this system.
This line of thinking (trying to stop cams, ie preventing piracy) shows they don't understand their audience. People will sacrifice quality to see movies they don't care that much about, or to see if it's worth the price of a ticket. Hell, people even downloaded the VHS screeners of recent movies.
Reducing ticket prices (matinees are edging closer to $10 at my local theaters) would go a long way I think.
My mother is disabled but a big cinemaphile and can't sit in movie theater seats anymore. She hates waiting for the DVD releases and will often settle for cams to avoid being spoiled by the rest of the world while waiting. If the industry would offer some sort of "Home Screening" Premium digital distribution service, say in the 2nd or 3rd week of release be able to view the movie in 720p once or twice before expiring for $50ish in your own home I know my mother wouldn't be only one to jump on that offer.
@RoboBagins PAX'd till he Plotz'd: Hell even I'd jump on something like that. The problem is that theaters make quite a bit off of concessions, and you being able to simply sit at home with your own store-bought junk food would undermine that business model.
Waste of money... As I read through the comments, some people are already trying to figure out how to beat this... Then the theatre would have to do something different, like checking bags, pockets, coats, etc before a person enters the theatre... Cavity searches are not fun
@selfprofessedgeek: There's some theaters that already check bags to make sure you don't sneak in your own food. I avoid these places cuz I wouldn't give up squat.
@Mecharine: I don't think a polarizer is the right one, but surely you can get a good IR filter that would work. Many digital cameras already have some sort of IR filtering anyway.
10/21/09
10/20/09
10/20/09
10/20/09
10/20/09
10/20/09
09/23/09
At least we can reduce the prirate community to only old people with fuddy hearts.
09/23/09
Yup because clearly every piece of electronics are devilish pirating devices! Hark! What is that!? A phone? EVIL! A DS? BLASPHEMY! Your watch? HERESY!
Do you even know what age we live in?
09/22/09
09/22/09
09/22/09
09/22/09
09/22/09
So this will stop camera pirates for all of about half an hour. Way to invest in that technology! :P
09/22/09
09/22/09
Hey guys, listen up! This has gone too far! Time and time again, Big Content has locked down our media, or implemented inconvenient methods of protecting their content. But now, a person has actually been VEXED by these counter-piracy measures. This has gone too far!
How many more people need to be VEXED before we stand up and say, "No more!" We cannot allow vexation to continue in America. We have to resist the vexers, wherever they may attack us!
Now....what does vex mean, again?
09/22/09
09/22/09
09/22/09
09/22/09
09/22/09
09/22/09
09/22/09
09/22/09
09/22/09
I don't watch cams, but I watch things on my iTouch.
If I'm watching a downloaded video @ home - I care about quality.
If I'm watching a downloaded video on my iTouch, it's because I'm on a train/bus/traveling and want entertainment. However, I still care about quality to some extent - I wouldn't watch a cam-rip on my iTouch. But, I'm not that concerned if the source material was high-def or not.
09/22/09
09/22/09
09/22/09
09/22/09
(a) pirated copies don't come from movie screens
(b) it only takes a lens filter to get rid of their "protection"
09/22/09
09/22/09
A lot of groups/individuals patch together releases from multiple sources to get the best quality they can. So the picture might be a cropped cam from Russia, but the audio might be from a cam taken in America.
A lot of theaters worldwide won't even bother to use this system.
This line of thinking (trying to stop cams, ie preventing piracy) shows they don't understand their audience. People will sacrifice quality to see movies they don't care that much about, or to see if it's worth the price of a ticket. Hell, people even downloaded the VHS screeners of recent movies.
Reducing ticket prices (matinees are edging closer to $10 at my local theaters) would go a long way I think.
My mother is disabled but a big cinemaphile and can't sit in movie theater seats anymore. She hates waiting for the DVD releases and will often settle for cams to avoid being spoiled by the rest of the world while waiting. If the industry would offer some sort of "Home Screening" Premium digital distribution service, say in the 2nd or 3rd week of release be able to view the movie in 720p once or twice before expiring for $50ish in your own home I know my mother wouldn't be only one to jump on that offer.
09/22/09
09/22/09
09/22/09
09/22/09
09/22/09
09/22/09
09/22/09