<![CDATA[Gizmodo: jump rope]]> http://cache.gawker.com/assets/base/img/thumbs140x140/gizmodo.com.png <![CDATA[Gizmodo: jump rope]]> http://gizmodo.com/tag/jump rope http://gizmodo.com/tag/jump rope <![CDATA[ Jumplay: Double Dutch for the New Millennium ]]> We have all seen those gadgets that display the time or a message using a rapidly oscillating wand fixed with tiny LEDs. However, only designer Jacky Wu was clever enough to apply this technology to a jump rope. After all, it makes perfect sense—as you jump, the device records each revolution then displays that figure (along with time and calories burned) using LEDs embedded on the rope.

jump_play2.jpgThe result is an illusion that makes it seem as if the counter is hovering in mid air. The only problem is that my gigantic feet would keep my jump count embarrassingly low. Not the kind of thing you want to advertise. Good thing for me that the Jumplay is only a concept at this point. [Yanko Design]

]]>
Tue, 29 Apr 2008 18:50:00 EDT Sean Fallon http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=385393&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ JumpSnap: Jump Rope Minus Rope ]]>

Rope is so 2005. And the JumpSnap agrees. It's a jump rope system that doesn't use rope. Instead, it appears (little info on their site) that weighted ball spin on handles to make it feel like there is a rope, even though there isn't. We expected some complex motion-sensing, laser guidance system. Apparently such technologies are still triumphed by good old weighted balls.

The idea isn't necessarily bad - especially if you live in a home where you don't want to scuff the floors/ceiling/cat. But at $60, the JumpSnap is about $55 too expensive.
Thanks Jacob!

Product Page

]]>
Sat, 07 Oct 2006 11:06:24 EDT Mark Wilson http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=205966&view=rss&microfeed=true