<![CDATA[Gizmodo: jumpsnap]]> http://cache.gawker.com/assets/base/img/thumbs140x140/gizmodo.com.png <![CDATA[Gizmodo: jumpsnap]]> http://gizmodo.com/tag/jumpsnap http://gizmodo.com/tag/jumpsnap <![CDATA[ JumpSnap: Jump Rope Minus Rope ]]>

Rope is so 2005. And the JumpSnap agrees. It's a jump rope system that doesn't use rope. Instead, it appears (little info on their site) that weighted ball spin on handles to make it feel like there is a rope, even though there isn't. We expected some complex motion-sensing, laser guidance system. Apparently such technologies are still triumphed by good old weighted balls.

The idea isn't necessarily bad - especially if you live in a home where you don't want to scuff the floors/ceiling/cat. But at $60, the JumpSnap is about $55 too expensive.
Thanks Jacob!

Product Page

]]>
Sat, 07 Oct 2006 11:06:24 EDT Mark Wilson http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=205966&view=rss&microfeed=true