Senior Contributing Editors:
Jesus Diaz
| AIM | Twitter
Mark Wilson, Reviews
| AIM | Twitter
Contributing Editors:
Matt Buchanan | AIM | Twitter
Adam Frucci | Twitter
Sean Fallon | Twitter
Jack Loftus | Twitter
John Herrman | Twitter
Dan Nosowitz
Chris Mascari
Danny Allen | Twitter
Rosa Golijan | Twitter
Chris Jacob
As a relatively new parent, I have to say that even if I was nerdy enough to be into speaking Klingon, and I mean REALLY into it, I would not take the risk of trying this on my child. I realize his child turned out okay, and he conscientiously tried to make sure of that, but in my opinion this just wasn't worth the risk for whatever he would gain from it. Risks include slowing real language development or just making the child look silly at school.
From what I understand, English is, effectively, a constructed language as well. It formed by accretion over time, but "core" English, a Germanic language, is embellished with words and structures from Latin, French, etc. Like the religion/cult dichotomy, English is a "real" language only because of its widespread use and acceptance.
Loads of people know, learn, and teach Latin, but it's not a "real" language, because ... Italians don't speak it? Okay, because there is no "home country" for it any more. Hebrew (I've heard but can't verify, no flames on this plz) is a constructed language, but is accepted as real because it's the official langauage of Israel.
The rule of thumb is, the difference between a dialect and a language ... is an army. Don't the Klingons have an army?
"I still don't think that Klingon (or any constructed language) is the best language to teach a child who's still barely grasping his mother tongue…"
While I concur about teaching a fictional and daresay, useless "language", I do believe real languages other than English should be taught to kids, especially in the U.S. It's a big hobbling factor for the U.S. to not have exposure to different syntaxes and structure. Sadly, the U.S. is more stupid for it.
Rosa Golijan promoted this comment
iomatic, hey, I'm an idiot, but I'll comment anyway was starred
iomatic, hey, I'm an idiot, but I'll comment anyway was unstarred
English is actually my third language, and I value the first two beyond words. The point is that they contain syntax and structure that does carry over into "real" languages as opposed to some of the elements of "fictional" languages.
"[...] hindered his son's social development by keeping focus away from a real language? I'm all for teaching foreign languages early on, but lets make it ones that are spoken on this planet, please."
Then people teaching their children Latin should be burned at the stake. Obviously Latin has a history on this planet, but I would imagine that more people speak fluent Klingon these days than know 10 words in Latin. In 50, 100, 200 years that number will increase even more.
Even better, how about ASL? That's not the mother's native tongue but she dared to teach him a non-spoken language? Blasphemy!
This. of course. is just taking your harsh criticisms of this man literally and trying to point out how ridiculous your accusations are of ruining the kids life. If the child ends up living in a cave and welding a Klingon forehead to his own, and speaks only that language for the rest of his days (or more realistically his language and social abilities don't develop as as other children his age) then you can begin judging people for how they raise their kids doing something as silly as this.
@madog: Latin actually would be good to learn since English, Spanish, Italian, Portuguese, and French are based on it, knowing Latin would at least let you know the gist of what someone was saying.
@Steve Jenkinson: You can't really claim english is based on latin. sections of it are, sections of it are also based on non-romance languages.
This includes, japenese, forms of chinese ( mandarin and cantonese), German, Hebrew, among many others. English is a melting pot language. It has no single root.
@twiner: While most of what you say is true, English does have a single root. Anglo-Saxon, Old English, Enlisc, or whatever you want to call it. English only has so much Latin influence because of French. The English royalty, for some reason, thought that French was a nicer language. That's why we say "pork" instead of "swineflesh", the literal translation of German "Schweinefleisch". English is an Anglo-Frisian language, so it's closely related to East Frisian.
@madog: You're a 100% right. Thats the frustrating thing. People can't seem to see this as the objective thing that it is. They insist on adding subjective opinions and values where there is none.
It is if X when Y then Z.
If I teach a kid Klingon but he has no outside reinforcement of he is going to go with English because he gets more reinforcement in using it then I drop teaching him Klingon.
You can trade out X with anything and the rule still applies. It could be Latin, it could even be an "living" language like Spanish, French, etc. If the kid isn't getting the reinforcement from using it during those developing years he is still going to drop it. The kid would still be 15 years old and not know a drop of Latin, Spanish, French ect.
Whether it impeded the child's development or not, the guy is a dork and has probably made his child miserable growing up being exposed to it. I mean look, my dad did embarassing stuff: he'd walk the dog in his bathrobe, belch and scratch in public etc...but none of that could possibly compare to walking around dressed like a freakin klingon.
I'm finding the criticism of this man to be sadly lacking in information on the actual situation, and widely ignorant of linguistics.
He did nothing wrong and some of you have said some pretty awful things without even knowing the child or the man or the whole situation.
It is quite clear he wasn't just speaking Klingon, and that the kid was exposed to English just as much, and that the majority of linguists agree that exposure to more languages makes for a healthier brain, not a hindered one. Yes Klingon is not a language that developed "naturally", but it is still a language and is not going to cause some kind of lasting harm and in all likelihood will actually make the kid better at picking up languages.
I bet a lot of you would be eating your words if you actually met the man and his child and saw them interact. A little ashamed here at some of the reactions I'm seeing.
@The5thElephant: Agreed. I spent waaaay too much time looking into it last night and found it to be a flat out amazing story.
It also speaks to taking the time to read the linking articles since one of them had the whole story (although it was another link click away) and the other comments in the thread.
Slightly on a different subject slightly on the same but after I watched Trekkies 2 I also stopped with all of the "guy is going to die a virgin" comments. For one thing I might not be that much of an uber geek about one thing but I'm that much of a super geek on other stuff that there isn't that much difference.
Plus Kroener ended up better off then me. He may have been walking around his High School in a Star Trek outfit in the first movie but by the second one he was married with a great job that he loves. Better then I can say for myself.
@tande04: I think you will find that reading a whole article is like climbing Everest for most people on the internet.
I refuse to comment on something I have not fully read to avoid sounding like an idiot. I have never been on the receiving end of a "RTFA" I am proud to say.
@The5thElephant: Shit not realizing that a picture doesn't specifically relate to the article (even when its stated as such) is a massive undertaking for most.
I find it hilarious how many times you get a old product shot for the article since there are no pictures of the rumored one and people come back with "looks like the old one".
Commenting on individual threads was fun but I'm just going to start this one to summarize the real story because its infinity more fascinating than this blurb about it makes it out.
First off this all happened about 15 years ago.
Speers wanted to see if the child would pick up a constructed language just like he would a traditional language. He had already learned Klingon himself because he saw it as a challenge and he choose to teach the kid Klingon because it had a culture (albeit also constructed) behind it as opposed to Esperanto which was a larger more complete constructed language. He also said that Klingon still represented a challenge to him because he'd have to think about how to say certain things that might not have a direct translation.
The idea was that a second language would still benefit the child later in life and it didn't really matter what the language was when he was a kid. The Mom supported it as did all his friends and family.
The child was exposed to plenty of English. The mom spoke only English and the kid got plenty of it at day care.
At two the kid was speaking Klingon and English (well like kids that are 2 speak). Dad was just Vavoy. Some of the ages are kinda hard to piece together but it sounds like by 3 the kid had moved completely to English (which the dad knew was inevitable since he was exposed to English much more) and so dad did too.
At 15 the kid has none of the "ill effects" so many of you predicted. For all intents and purposes he seems as well adjusted as any other kid (as Speers put it in one posting update "the kid isn't a hall monitor"). He doesn't know a lick of Klingon but he is multilingual in other languages that his parents taught him.
Edit: It obviously took me too long to write that since Rosa got in an update in the time. :p
Good to see her add some more to the story since like I said the real one is much better than the shot in the dark one.
Why, oh, why, can't everyone else read the articles, instead of commenting from the hip with their black-and-white judgment about something they are completely ignorant of?
I spent the first 4 years of my life in Chile, and we spoke only Spanish. Then my family moved to Montreal, Canada, and we first learned French, and then English. Now I can speak, read and write in three languages. I can also understand Italian, Portuguese and German, who are closely related to one of those three. I have not suffered from this, au contraire, I can honeslty say I am much better off with MORE tools in my shed than most people. Learning is something that the brain does very well, and the more you know, the more you can learn.
Er. Maybe you folks at Giz should learn a little more about the process our brain goes through when we learn language. Obviously Speers does, the article linked as source states he has an advanced degree in Computational Linguistics.
It also states *he* only spoke to his son in Klingon. It is not unreasonable to expect that the other people around the boy were not forced to do so.
My most-native tongue is SĂ¡mi. And a variation of it that is spoken by less than a few thousand people. Useful? Well, I've met exactly ONE other person in North America who wasn't a relative who speaks it. Having also done the same kind of linguistic studies as Speers, I can tell you that it didn't hinder me at all. By the time I was in school I had easily picked up the English and German I needed, and having the strong linguistic background really helped me excel. Our brains are pretty nifty like that, they don't mind learning words when we're still in the learning word process.
@tyskkvinna: I doubt that the issue is with the fact that he's teaching his son Klingon. And frankly, the Computational Linguistics degree highlights the point:
Dude used his kid as an experiment. Granted, it was nothing like shocks to the brain or something weird like that. And this guy didn't teach his son a rare language that the family uses. He taught him a language from a TV show "just to see" if he'd pick it up. The dude is a passionate nerd, which I admire, but it somehow feels just a little wrong to go dicking around with a kids brain "just to see".
I once heard that infants respond more to tone than to words. So, theoretically, I could say to my (hypothetical) child in a sweet loving tone, "You're a little moron aren't you? Yes you are. You're daddies little sack of crap. You're my disgusting ball of feces. Yes you are." and the child would think I'm pleased with him/her.
However, later on in life, I'd find it very difficult to explain to my child why I called him a sack of crap as an infant. To say nothing of what my (hypothetical) wife would (and should) hit me with for pulling something like that.
@tande04: The kid doesn't know the difference between natural and constructed. If Dad chose to teach him, say, Chinese, and the kid was not exposed to the language outside of their conversations, how would that be different?
@Alfisted: It wouldn't have and it would have ended the same way. The kid would have been reinforced more in English than Chinese and he would have stopped using the Chinese at one point and switched to the language he was more familiar with, English. Assuming that he was no longer exposed to it the kid would still be 15 and not know a lick of Chinese.
You're right the kid didn't know if it was constructed or natural and that was the point. He gave the kid all of the benefit of early exposure to a second language and did it in a way that also challenged himself as a linguist.
I love it how he says "any human language" not "any other human language".
The kid will learn what ever you throw at him. I grew up with two languages. Klingon and English is no different than German and English or Spanish and English or Latvian and English.
@WWSJD: This guy only spoke Klingon to his kid for 3 years. Every conversation with his child was an experiment. This guy is an asshat no matter which way you look at it.
@The n00b: My father taught me right from wrong, how to speak, and how to ride a bike. What he DIDN'T do was experiment on me.
Just because he taught me not to call people names doesn't mean that I necessarily practice what he preached. The fact that my calling this guy an asshat wasn't nice, doesn't negate the fact that he was one for doing this.
It's a rather frivolous way to approach an interesting academic question, but there is no way he's hindered his son's social development. First, very kids don't really focus on verbalising in social interaction at that age as much as they do only 2 years later (watch a bunch of 3-yr-olds play together. You'll see). Much of what they communicate can be gleaned through stance, facial expressing, action, and other body language.
Second, and more importantly, up until somewhere around the beginning of adolescence children can acquire new languages very quickly to the point where they can speak them as if they had been speaking them since they first learned to talk. This is why there are bilingual kids from multicultural households. Moreover, immigrant kids pick up English (for example) and speak it like they have all their lives while their parents still struggle with it. As long as they arrive in their new country before the age of 12-ish, you'd never know they were born elsewhere.
When I was little, my mother used to take me along as a translator when she went shopping until she felt strong enough in the language to do it herself. Honestly, kids are little powerhouses when it comes to language. This kid may have a weird dad, but his social development has not been hindered by this silly experiment.
*Disclaimer - I wrote this while drinking my first coffee, so please forgive typos, etc.*
@Nigerian Business Executive: The ineffectiveness of his attempts aside, its still pretty douchey to experiment on your developing child in a do-it-yourself manner.
First, he spoke Klingon at the *exclusion* of a real language so he is depriving his son of natural language acquisition and natural father-son interaction.
Second, Klingon is not a language. It is a small group of phonetics created by hollywood types for a tv show that, you know, isn't real. did I mention it isn't a real language?
third, that a child doesn't speak until later on doesn't mean that exposure to language during infancy doesn't help form linguistic pathways for later use. "speaking" Klingon deprives the developing brain of essential exposure to a real language.
@Nigerian Business Executive: I'm not so sure that this will be without significant effect. Crucially, a baby learns the phonology of a language during the first couple of years, more than the syntax. In effect, if this father did indeed starve the child of "English" the child will have learned Klingon phonemes and rules, not English ones. That HAS to have an impact, albeit at best one of delay, on the learning of English. Language learned by immersion requires an ability to isolate the phonemes of that language, this child will not have the ability to make the same phonological distinctions that a native three year old will. I don't know Klingon, but /t/ and /th/ for instance are not distinct in some human languages, they are in English...a French speaker has difficulty distinguishing, say "team" and "theme".
I'm troubled that the father said the child seemed to be _beginning_ to learn Klingon. My three year old is not _beginning_ to learn English, he's speaking it like a normal three year old native speaker: very well.
Finally, let's face it, the real social injustice is that this kid has this guy as a father.
*Disclaimer, like the father in the story, I've a post grad qualification in Computational Linguistics and a masters in Linguistics, but hopefully, I'm not a dumbass. Doubtless my kids will tell you a different story*
@frigg: Actually, Klingon was developed by a linguist and is a complete, albeit man-made, language. It would not hinder anyone to learn the language since almost anything you could care to express is expressible in Klingon. If anything, being exposed to a language with grammar different from English before switching should give the child the ability to learn languages much easier. Regardless, we'll just have to wait how he does in the future. You can't really call "bullshit" at this point since no one has ever done this before.
@frigg:
He spoke Klingon at the 'exclusion' of other languages but no one else did. Even he didn't completely only speak Klingon to the kid. He sang him Klingon lullabies but Dr. Seuss was still in English when he read it for example.
Second, Klingon is surprisingly a language. It started as just Doohan spitting some words down and making the extras pronounce them but when it came time to put it in the movie they hired a linguist to create it around the same rules that 'normal' languages use.
Third, thats exactly why there is nothing wrong with this. Speaking Klingon didn't do any harm, it helped. It formed more pathways. To me (and I assume you) growing up bottle got us bottle so thats all we ever called it. Here bottle got him bottle but so did 'HIvje'. So now he's got an abstract view of what a bottle is and its easier for him to associate with it in different ways. Thats part of the reason adults have more trouble learning new languages. Everything is so ingrained by that point they see a bottle and don't "think" of the bottle in another language they "think" of a bottle in English and than recite the memorized word for bottle.
@frigg: I'm not sure what a "linguistic pathway" is and I'm even less sure why you choose an insulting, condescending rhetoric to make a point that others have made in a much more reasonably phrased manner, but the point is taken that Klingon is an invented language and not a natural one.
Another invented language is American Sign Language (ASL), used by hundreds of thousands of people for first language interaction every day. While other sign languages are natural, ASL was invented in the 1800s. All sign languages make use of your same "linguistic pathways" and children appear to acquire them in much the same manner and timeframe as verbal languages are acquired, ASL included.
Yes, the fact that ASL has been spoken as a first language for over 100 years certainly shows it to be a natural language in all respects save its origins (much like a pidgin - a blend of many languages used only to aid communication between multilingual communities - becomes a creole - a pidgin with native speakers). In contrast, whereas Klingon is a joke amongst people who fancy themselves superior to others.
But my point was not that Klingon was a real language and it was ok to teach it to him. It certainly is never ok to experiment on children, particularly because they cannot give their consent and because of the possible longterm effects. My point was that I don't think the child has been harmed by not being exposed to English from his father until age 3. And as forceful as your manner of disputing me may be, I still believe that. Neither you nor I will know until we hear of a follow up in a couple of years.
@Gidim: I agree that the fact that the child was beginning to learn at age 3 is troubling, but I'm wondering how much of that is due to having the guy as a father in general and how much of it may be linguistic. Really, the ony way to know would be to stick the kid with some other 3-yr-olds with relatively normal parents and see how the interaction goes, both linguistic and non-linguistic.
Ans as to your first point, there would indeed be a delay in acquisition of English, just as there was a delay for me when I moved here at age 5 with no previous exposure to English phonology. By age 6, no one could tell I wasn't born here.
As for your kids, they'll think you're a dumbass no matter what, so don't sweat it. At least your're not Klingon dad!
@tande04: If indeed the child was exposed to plenty of English, then I adjust my aversion to this action. Much less of a big deal.
I do disagree with the last paragraph, there is plenty of evidence for the interference of homophony in second language acquisition: the english speaker thinking of "savon" when trying to recall the french word for "soup" for instance. Moreover, translation is an inexact science. It is a mistake to think that every concept in one language has an analogue in another. The classic examples of this are the colour spectrum. Some Ls have far fewer colour words than others. Notoriously, the Welsh blue/grey distinction is different to English.
@Gidim: Well I'm no linguist. You'll have to explain interference of homophony.
He was and many of the people speaking out in support of what he was doing was as well.
What you're getting at was one of the whole reasons that he said he chose Klingon in the end. For example there wasn't a Klingon word for table so it became "the thing that is flat". Bottle was "vessel". An interesting aside there wasn't a Klingon word for "love" since Kingon's don't have the concept so he just used the English word which I found sweet in its own right. Either way it was still a challenge for him too.
11/19/09
11/19/09
Loads of people know, learn, and teach Latin, but it's not a "real" language, because ... Italians don't speak it? Okay, because there is no "home country" for it any more. Hebrew (I've heard but can't verify, no flames on this plz) is a constructed language, but is accepted as real because it's the official langauage of Israel.
The rule of thumb is, the difference between a dialect and a language ... is an army. Don't the Klingons have an army?
11/19/09
[memory-alpha.org]
11/19/09
While I concur about teaching a fictional and daresay, useless "language", I do believe real languages other than English should be taught to kids, especially in the U.S. It's a big hobbling factor for the U.S. to not have exposure to different syntaxes and structure. Sadly, the U.S. is more stupid for it.
Just a side note.
11/19/09
English is actually my third language, and I value the first two beyond words. The point is that they contain syntax and structure that does carry over into "real" languages as opposed to some of the elements of "fictional" languages.
11/19/09
11/19/09
11/19/09
"[...] hindered his son's social development by keeping focus away from a real language? I'm all for teaching foreign languages early on, but lets make it ones that are spoken on this planet, please."
Then people teaching their children Latin should be burned at the stake. Obviously Latin has a history on this planet, but I would imagine that more people speak fluent Klingon these days than know 10 words in Latin. In 50, 100, 200 years that number will increase even more.
Even better, how about ASL? That's not the mother's native tongue but she dared to teach him a non-spoken language? Blasphemy!
This. of course. is just taking your harsh criticisms of this man literally and trying to point out how ridiculous your accusations are of ruining the kids life. If the child ends up living in a cave and welding a Klingon forehead to his own, and speaks only that language for the rest of his days (or more realistically his language and social abilities don't develop as as other children his age) then you can begin judging people for how they raise their kids doing something as silly as this.
11/19/09
11/19/09
This includes, japenese, forms of chinese ( mandarin and cantonese), German, Hebrew, among many others. English is a melting pot language. It has no single root.
11/19/09
11/19/09
It is if X when Y then Z.
If I teach a kid Klingon but he has no outside reinforcement of he is going to go with English because he gets more reinforcement in using it then I drop teaching him Klingon.
You can trade out X with anything and the rule still applies. It could be Latin, it could even be an "living" language like Spanish, French, etc. If the kid isn't getting the reinforcement from using it during those developing years he is still going to drop it. The kid would still be 15 years old and not know a drop of Latin, Spanish, French ect.
11/19/09
Oy vey.
11/19/09
11/19/09
He did nothing wrong and some of you have said some pretty awful things without even knowing the child or the man or the whole situation.
It is quite clear he wasn't just speaking Klingon, and that the kid was exposed to English just as much, and that the majority of linguists agree that exposure to more languages makes for a healthier brain, not a hindered one. Yes Klingon is not a language that developed "naturally", but it is still a language and is not going to cause some kind of lasting harm and in all likelihood will actually make the kid better at picking up languages.
I bet a lot of you would be eating your words if you actually met the man and his child and saw them interact. A little ashamed here at some of the reactions I'm seeing.
11/19/09
It also speaks to taking the time to read the linking articles since one of them had the whole story (although it was another link click away) and the other comments in the thread.
Slightly on a different subject slightly on the same but after I watched Trekkies 2 I also stopped with all of the "guy is going to die a virgin" comments. For one thing I might not be that much of an uber geek about one thing but I'm that much of a super geek on other stuff that there isn't that much difference.
Plus Kroener ended up better off then me. He may have been walking around his High School in a Star Trek outfit in the first movie but by the second one he was married with a great job that he loves. Better then I can say for myself.
11/19/09
I refuse to comment on something I have not fully read to avoid sounding like an idiot. I have never been on the receiving end of a "RTFA" I am proud to say.
11/19/09
I find it hilarious how many times you get a old product shot for the article since there are no pictures of the rumored one and people come back with "looks like the old one".
11/19/09
First off this all happened about 15 years ago.
Speers wanted to see if the child would pick up a constructed language just like he would a traditional language. He had already learned Klingon himself because he saw it as a challenge and he choose to teach the kid Klingon because it had a culture (albeit also constructed) behind it as opposed to Esperanto which was a larger more complete constructed language. He also said that Klingon still represented a challenge to him because he'd have to think about how to say certain things that might not have a direct translation.
The idea was that a second language would still benefit the child later in life and it didn't really matter what the language was when he was a kid. The Mom supported it as did all his friends and family.
The child was exposed to plenty of English. The mom spoke only English and the kid got plenty of it at day care.
[www.washingtoncitypaper.com]
At two the kid was speaking Klingon and English (well like kids that are 2 speak). Dad was just Vavoy. Some of the ages are kinda hard to piece together but it sounds like by 3 the kid had moved completely to English (which the dad knew was inevitable since he was exposed to English much more) and so dad did too.
[www.wired.com]
At 15 the kid has none of the "ill effects" so many of you predicted. For all intents and purposes he seems as well adjusted as any other kid (as Speers put it in one posting update "the kid isn't a hall monitor"). He doesn't know a lick of Klingon but he is multilingual in other languages that his parents taught him.
Edit: It obviously took me too long to write that since Rosa got in an update in the time. :p
Good to see her add some more to the story since like I said the real one is much better than the shot in the dark one.
11/19/09
Why, oh, why, can't everyone else read the articles, instead of commenting from the hip with their black-and-white judgment about something they are completely ignorant of?
11/19/09
Btw, is there a "google translate" but for klingon anywhere on the net?
11/19/09
11/19/09
11/19/09
It also states *he* only spoke to his son in Klingon. It is not unreasonable to expect that the other people around the boy were not forced to do so.
My most-native tongue is SĂ¡mi. And a variation of it that is spoken by less than a few thousand people. Useful? Well, I've met exactly ONE other person in North America who wasn't a relative who speaks it. Having also done the same kind of linguistic studies as Speers, I can tell you that it didn't hinder me at all. By the time I was in school I had easily picked up the English and German I needed, and having the strong linguistic background really helped me excel. Our brains are pretty nifty like that, they don't mind learning words when we're still in the learning word process.
11/19/09
Dude used his kid as an experiment. Granted, it was nothing like shocks to the brain or something weird like that. And this guy didn't teach his son a rare language that the family uses. He taught him a language from a TV show "just to see" if he'd pick it up. The dude is a passionate nerd, which I admire, but it somehow feels just a little wrong to go dicking around with a kids brain "just to see".
I once heard that infants respond more to tone than to words. So, theoretically, I could say to my (hypothetical) child in a sweet loving tone, "You're a little moron aren't you? Yes you are. You're daddies little sack of crap. You're my disgusting ball of feces. Yes you are." and the child would think I'm pleased with him/her.
However, later on in life, I'd find it very difficult to explain to my child why I called him a sack of crap as an infant. To say nothing of what my (hypothetical) wife would (and should) hit me with for pulling something like that.
11/19/09
11/19/09
11/19/09
#tips
11/19/09
You're right the kid didn't know if it was constructed or natural and that was the point. He gave the kid all of the benefit of early exposure to a second language and did it in a way that also challenged himself as a linguist.
11/19/09
The kid will learn what ever you throw at him. I grew up with two languages. Klingon and English is no different than German and English or Spanish and English or Latvian and English.
11/19/09
11/19/09
11/19/09
11/19/09
11/19/09
Just making a point.
11/20/09
Just because he taught me not to call people names doesn't mean that I necessarily practice what he preached. The fact that my calling this guy an asshat wasn't nice, doesn't negate the fact that he was one for doing this.
11/19/09
It's a rather frivolous way to approach an interesting academic question, but there is no way he's hindered his son's social development. First, very kids don't really focus on verbalising in social interaction at that age as much as they do only 2 years later (watch a bunch of 3-yr-olds play together. You'll see). Much of what they communicate can be gleaned through stance, facial expressing, action, and other body language.
Second, and more importantly, up until somewhere around the beginning of adolescence children can acquire new languages very quickly to the point where they can speak them as if they had been speaking them since they first learned to talk. This is why there are bilingual kids from multicultural households. Moreover, immigrant kids pick up English (for example) and speak it like they have all their lives while their parents still struggle with it. As long as they arrive in their new country before the age of 12-ish, you'd never know they were born elsewhere.
When I was little, my mother used to take me along as a translator when she went shopping until she felt strong enough in the language to do it herself. Honestly, kids are little powerhouses when it comes to language. This kid may have a weird dad, but his social development has not been hindered by this silly experiment.
*Disclaimer - I wrote this while drinking my first coffee, so please forgive typos, etc.*
11/19/09
11/19/09
Um, er... Bullshit!
First, he spoke Klingon at the *exclusion* of a real language so he is depriving his son of natural language acquisition and natural father-son interaction.
Second, Klingon is not a language. It is a small group of phonetics created by hollywood types for a tv show that, you know, isn't real. did I mention it isn't a real language?
third, that a child doesn't speak until later on doesn't mean that exposure to language during infancy doesn't help form linguistic pathways for later use. "speaking" Klingon deprives the developing brain of essential exposure to a real language.
11/19/09
I'm troubled that the father said the child seemed to be _beginning_ to learn Klingon. My three year old is not _beginning_ to learn English, he's speaking it like a normal three year old native speaker: very well.
Finally, let's face it, the real social injustice is that this kid has this guy as a father.
*Disclaimer, like the father in the story, I've a post grad qualification in Computational Linguistics and a masters in Linguistics, but hopefully, I'm not a dumbass. Doubtless my kids will tell you a different story*
11/19/09
11/19/09
11/19/09
He spoke Klingon at the 'exclusion' of other languages but no one else did. Even he didn't completely only speak Klingon to the kid. He sang him Klingon lullabies but Dr. Seuss was still in English when he read it for example.
Second, Klingon is surprisingly a language. It started as just Doohan spitting some words down and making the extras pronounce them but when it came time to put it in the movie they hired a linguist to create it around the same rules that 'normal' languages use.
Third, thats exactly why there is nothing wrong with this. Speaking Klingon didn't do any harm, it helped. It formed more pathways. To me (and I assume you) growing up bottle got us bottle so thats all we ever called it. Here bottle got him bottle but so did 'HIvje'. So now he's got an abstract view of what a bottle is and its easier for him to associate with it in different ways. Thats part of the reason adults have more trouble learning new languages. Everything is so ingrained by that point they see a bottle and don't "think" of the bottle in another language they "think" of a bottle in English and than recite the memorized word for bottle.
11/19/09
Another invented language is American Sign Language (ASL), used by hundreds of thousands of people for first language interaction every day. While other sign languages are natural, ASL was invented in the 1800s. All sign languages make use of your same "linguistic pathways" and children appear to acquire them in much the same manner and timeframe as verbal languages are acquired, ASL included.
Yes, the fact that ASL has been spoken as a first language for over 100 years certainly shows it to be a natural language in all respects save its origins (much like a pidgin - a blend of many languages used only to aid communication between multilingual communities - becomes a creole - a pidgin with native speakers). In contrast, whereas Klingon is a joke amongst people who fancy themselves superior to others.
But my point was not that Klingon was a real language and it was ok to teach it to him. It certainly is never ok to experiment on children, particularly because they cannot give their consent and because of the possible longterm effects. My point was that I don't think the child has been harmed by not being exposed to English from his father until age 3. And as forceful as your manner of disputing me may be, I still believe that. Neither you nor I will know until we hear of a follow up in a couple of years.
11/19/09
Ans as to your first point, there would indeed be a delay in acquisition of English, just as there was a delay for me when I moved here at age 5 with no previous exposure to English phonology. By age 6, no one could tell I wasn't born here.
As for your kids, they'll think you're a dumbass no matter what, so don't sweat it. At least your're not Klingon dad!
11/19/09
I do disagree with the last paragraph, there is plenty of evidence for the interference of homophony in second language acquisition: the english speaker thinking of "savon" when trying to recall the french word for "soup" for instance. Moreover, translation is an inexact science. It is a mistake to think that every concept in one language has an analogue in another. The classic examples of this are the colour spectrum. Some Ls have far fewer colour words than others. Notoriously, the Welsh blue/grey distinction is different to English.
11/19/09
He was and many of the people speaking out in support of what he was doing was as well.
What you're getting at was one of the whole reasons that he said he chose Klingon in the end. For example there wasn't a Klingon word for table so it became "the thing that is flat". Bottle was "vessel". An interesting aside there wasn't a Klingon word for "love" since Kingon's don't have the concept so he just used the English word which I found sweet in its own right. Either way it was still a challenge for him too.