Senior Contributing Editors:
Jesus Diaz
| AIM | Twitter
Mark Wilson, Reviews
| AIM | Twitter
Contributing Editors:
Matt Buchanan | AIM | Twitter
Adam Frucci | Twitter
Sean Fallon | Twitter
Jack Loftus | Twitter
John Herrman | Twitter
Dan Nosowitz
Chris Mascari
Danny Allen | Twitter
Rosa Golijan | Twitter
Chris Jacob
@Gann: @Bokusatsu_Tenshi: I'm serious. He couldn't even play his own hand of cards on the Holodeck! How is supposed to destroy the universe if he can't call in poker?
Tom Hanks is an actor. You know how many scientists would kill, I mean actually kill to be able to do this? But he's an actor (who is quite good) who is going to be in a terrible film with terrible science and even more terrible "history" based on a book by a terrible (at least in the historical sense, people seem to buy his shit. people also buy the GLOBE.) author, so he gets to turn the LHC back on?
@nachobel: To be fair, the LHC is a publicly funded project, so some PR and making the masses happy can't hurt. I agree that there are scientists more deserving but sometimes you have to do things to make the masses happy, and this is one of them.
Everyone knows they've been using the downtime to build a Television Chocolate Camera into the LHC like the one that shrunk Mike Teavee in "Willy Wonka and the Chocolate Factory."
The second Tom Hanks pushes the button, the TCC will transport him into a little box, and he too will be 4" tall. Tell me there isn't a single Tom Hanks movie that wouldn't be just a little bit better if he were only 4" tall.
@frigg: Actually, if Tom Hanks were only 4" tall in "Castaway," the ship at the end would likely have missed him, and he would have died at sea and been eaten by fish. Arguably, though, that still would've been a better movie.
@bosskev: Yeah, that might be problematic, but only because hightest discrimination still dominates promotion policies in many corporations. One has to wonder, would Tom Hanks have been promoted quite so rapidly at that advertising firm in "Big" if he were only 4" tall?
However, given the general suspension of disbelief throughout the film, I think the audience would not only have accepted a 4" advertising executive, in many ways, a 4" advertising executive promoted to the top tiers of a company only days after being hired at an entry level position would have made for an even more sympathetic character. "Big" starring a 4" tall Tom Hanks would have energized height-challenged workers much the way "Working Girl" energized dopey-voiced bimbos in the workplace following its groundbreaking release.
Indeed. It's called a Penning trap. Basically, any antimatter that has been able to be produced so far has been charged, so you can use a magnetic containment field in vacuum to ensure it doesn't annihilate. Although I wonder how hard it is to get it in there.....
@Benjammn: Better than The Da Vinci isn't saying a heck of a lot. And destroying the Vatican with antimatter? Even Crichton never came up with that one, and he was all about science being misused.
02/18/09
His hair'll be a-floppin'.
02/18/09
02/18/09
02/18/09
02/18/09
02/18/09
02/18/09
Tom Hanks is an actor. You know how many scientists would kill, I mean actually kill to be able to do this? But he's an actor (who is quite good) who is going to be in a terrible film with terrible science and even more terrible "history" based on a book by a terrible (at least in the historical sense, people seem to buy his shit. people also buy the GLOBE.) author, so he gets to turn the LHC back on?
Fucking hell.
02/18/09
02/18/09
02/18/09
02/18/09
Like a Britney Spears song.
02/18/09
02/18/09
Everyone knows they've been using the downtime to build a Television Chocolate Camera into the LHC like the one that shrunk Mike Teavee in "Willy Wonka and the Chocolate Factory."
The second Tom Hanks pushes the button, the TCC will transport him into a little box, and he too will be 4" tall. Tell me there isn't a single Tom Hanks movie that wouldn't be just a little bit better if he were only 4" tall.
02/18/09
Err...umm..."Big"?
02/18/09
02/18/09
However, given the general suspension of disbelief throughout the film, I think the audience would not only have accepted a 4" advertising executive, in many ways, a 4" advertising executive promoted to the top tiers of a company only days after being hired at an entry level position would have made for an even more sympathetic character. "Big" starring a 4" tall Tom Hanks would have energized height-challenged workers much the way "Working Girl" energized dopey-voiced bimbos in the workplace following its groundbreaking release.
02/18/09
Or if it's Tom Hanks, can he have a donkey with him from his character in Bachelor Party?
02/18/09
02/18/09
Plus if the world is destroyed then at least it was at the hands of a supervillain.
02/18/09
02/18/09
02/18/09
Maybe it was caused by the test sequence they just ran on the LHC..
02/18/09
@admoseremic: Look to the East on the third day after you start the LHC.
02/18/09
02/18/09
02/18/09
02/18/09
02/18/09
02/18/09
Indeed. It's called a Penning trap. Basically, any antimatter that has been able to be produced so far has been charged, so you can use a magnetic containment field in vacuum to ensure it doesn't annihilate. Although I wonder how hard it is to get it in there.....
02/18/09
02/18/09
12/10/08
12/10/08
ironically, thanks to a joint, I finally understood the universe and black holes
12/10/08
*embarassed*
12/10/08
12/10/08
12/10/08
12/10/08