Senior Contributing Editors:
Jesus Diaz
| AIM | Twitter
Mark Wilson, Reviews
| AIM | Twitter
Contributing Editors:
Matt Buchanan | AIM | Twitter
Adam Frucci | Twitter
Sean Fallon | Twitter
Jack Loftus | Twitter
John Herrman | Twitter
Dan Nosowitz
Chris Mascari
Kat Hannaford | Twitter
Rosa Golijan | Twitter
Chris Jacob
I love Stanley tools. I have a couple (not many, since I am not very handy) of their tools, and they are fabulous. I also have the Stanley branded thermos by Aladdin, which I must say, I have put through HELL and its still fabulous about 10 years into ownership. Its so tough, I plan on leaving it to my kid, when I die in 150 or so years.
@Curves: There's nothing more attractive in a woman than her knowing how to handle a good tool. Incredibly. Sexy. What else you got in that arsenal of yours, Curves?
@TheSonOfKrypton: If you want to know what other Stanley branded tools are in my toolbox, just the odd hand tool or two and a kick ass tape measure. If, however, what you really want to know is what other tools are in my arsenal, thats a conversation for another blog. ;)
@Curves: I glad you use tools, being a tool using animal and all but when you say fabulous to discribe tools well, that just not right, tough, dirty, smasherific, not fabulous and please not cute never cute...
@Hiroak: No pink tools, but I do keep them all clean and even oiled (as needed) and I also freak out if someone borrows them and then doesnt put them away. My favorite is my 18V drill/driver with TWO batteries and the most borrowed tool at the office is a pair of medical hemostats that are great for geting torn paper from the copier, printers or faxes.
@Toshie: To a degree. I think it's their way to float the idea before the App bubble bursts. On balance, if they get a lot of interest, they can mount a pay system without being left hanging.
@92BuickLeSabre: It's nice to read comments from the more level-headed of the bunch. It really keeps things centered.
On that note, some people will believe you if you tell them that the liquid in a level is bovine urine, preferred for its specific viscosity that allows it to be used in such a manner.
@General Halfshaftery: I wlouldnt be surprised if someone makes that comment in the app ratings. Some of the dumbest people in the world have an iPhone/Touch and feel the need to voice their (stupid) "opinions".
I'm sure there's already a, "This game is stupid. I beat it in 5 secs. Dunt bother dling. " there.
However, I always get a kick from people complaining about lack of sound. Eeither because their phone is on silent or they have a 1G Touch. "So stupid that you have to plug in headphones to hear this. Why didn't the devs say this fart app wouldn't work without them? Don't dl they are trying to cheat us out of monies."
@madog: Oh, and I forgot the classic, "this golf/bowling/fishing app made me lose my grip on my phone and it shattered when it hit the wall. Be careful and don't dl it. 1 star!"
How come this isn't digital yet, I mean to have the balance like the automatic focus, so that it's digital in the cameras viewer and all, you know what I mean, right?
It's not a solution for 100% of the time, but it is useful in certain scenarios, I've used mine many times on a tripod mount when taking a shot that is vertically oriented. The level on my tripod only tells me when the tripod itself is perfectly level, and the level on my gimbaled head only tells me the camera is level when taking a horizontal shot.
Can I use the straighten tool to straighten out shots instead? Sure, but it requires me to crop off quite a bit of material for being just a degree or two off. Why not just get it done right the first time? If I'm doing a wide-angle landscape+sky shot in vertical orientation, I want it to be straight, and since I'm doing a wide shot, I obviously don't want to be cropping it very much.
For handheld shots its not useful unless you're not looking through the viewfinder (it might seem strange, but with modern autofocus systems, you can take blind shots and often get great results). Oftentimes I'll photograph an event without looking through the viewfinder much so that I a.) don't only see whats in the viewfinder, and b.) don't live events only through the lens. The level gives me a good idea of if I'm shifting the camera too much to the side or tilting it up or down too much.
My horizontal shots through the camera have usually been spot on without any leveling, but my handheld vertical shots were always off a bit. I bought a battery grip for my camera which not only extended my battery life a whole lot, but gave me a second set of controls for vertical shooting. That's my first suggestion for those trying to tidy up vertical shots.
I can see it being very useful if you're using a gorillapod or otherwise don't have a bubble level on your tripod, but not so useful for hand-held shots.
And yeah the most expensive DSLRs have a level in the viewfinder, but the last time I checked, the price difference between them and lower models like the Nikon D40 was much greater than $11.
12/15/09
12/15/09
12/15/09
I don't care, once I have the money and time to build a rig, I'm still going to go for this case.
It's just a beautiful work of art.
And for those who don't think it's amazing, think of it as a high tech futuristic PS2 ;)
12/15/09
12/15/09
Look! It's Frank Lloyd's PS2 everybody!!!
04/13/09
04/13/09
04/13/09
04/13/09
I find your optimism refreshing.
04/13/09
04/13/09
04/14/09
04/13/09
04/13/09
04/13/09
04/13/09
04/13/09
On that note, some people will believe you if you tell them that the liquid in a level is bovine urine, preferred for its specific viscosity that allows it to be used in such a manner.
04/13/09
04/13/09
04/13/09
Nope. Too easy.
04/13/09
04/13/09
04/13/09
I'm sure there's already a, "This game is stupid. I beat it in 5 secs. Dunt bother dling. " there.
However, I always get a kick from people complaining about lack of sound. Eeither because their phone is on silent or they have a 1G Touch. "So stupid that you have to plug in headphones to hear this. Why didn't the devs say this fart app wouldn't work without them? Don't dl they are trying to cheat us out of monies."
04/13/09
04/13/09
04/13/09
04/13/09
11/06/08
11/05/08
11/05/08
Can I use the straighten tool to straighten out shots instead? Sure, but it requires me to crop off quite a bit of material for being just a degree or two off. Why not just get it done right the first time? If I'm doing a wide-angle landscape+sky shot in vertical orientation, I want it to be straight, and since I'm doing a wide shot, I obviously don't want to be cropping it very much.
For handheld shots its not useful unless you're not looking through the viewfinder (it might seem strange, but with modern autofocus systems, you can take blind shots and often get great results). Oftentimes I'll photograph an event without looking through the viewfinder much so that I a.) don't only see whats in the viewfinder, and b.) don't live events only through the lens. The level gives me a good idea of if I'm shifting the camera too much to the side or tilting it up or down too much.
My horizontal shots through the camera have usually been spot on without any leveling, but my handheld vertical shots were always off a bit. I bought a battery grip for my camera which not only extended my battery life a whole lot, but gave me a second set of controls for vertical shooting. That's my first suggestion for those trying to tidy up vertical shots.
11/05/08
And yeah the most expensive DSLRs have a level in the viewfinder, but the last time I checked, the price difference between them and lower models like the Nikon D40 was much greater than $11.
11/05/08