@Jrsy Devil's Advocate®: Not finding the Higgs Boson would be the best result of all. Other particles could be found that point to other theories like Supersymetry. The Higgs Boson leaves many hole in solutions of physics.
It's a complex machine made up of many different parts, all designed to work together, but only integrated last year. Each of those parts will conform to its specifications (within a certain margin), but you never know how everything is going to work together until you build it and try it. You can model and predict and design all you want, but no model is perfect... that's why we use healthy margins of safety. So yeah, I imagine they do have a much better feel for the machine now than they did then.
That's not to say the understanding of the physics has changed. The likelihood of the machine producing a blackhole which kills us all is still just as likely as the spontaneous transformation of every southpaw into a giant man-eating, airbreathing tunafish.
Still, I find the idea that the Higgs boson cannot exist free, and thus the LHC can never function properly, fascinating. It's not as outlandish as many thing.
"Yeah, we don't really even know what we are doing here... we just welded a bunch of shiny shit together to make a rough circle of tubes underground. And then fired like, particles and stuff through it. It was awesome dude."
This makes me happy. The caption says "The sign at top warns of the presence of helium, argon and/or nitrogen in nearby pipes - gases that (if they leaked out) could displace oxygen and cause unconsciousness. "
@Duckspwn: If you are not impressed by the unimaginable complexity of this machine, they should fucking take your star away.
In a system this large, the statistical probability of initial failure is almost 1. They expected it to break, and now it's fixed again. It will probably break again, and they'll eep fixing it until it works.
@Duckspwn: when I try to compile freshly written computer code, if there is a single error I toss the whole damn thing and move on with my life. Thus, I agree with you.
@m4ximusprim3: Hmm, so that's what it feels like to troll... Satisfying, but it leaves you with an odd, slightly dirty feeling. Kinda like masturbating.
@Duckspwn: How is that trolling? You're commenting on a gadget website devoted to cutting edge technology, just about none of which works reliably because it's first generation. Your viewpoint is techno-phobic to the point of absurdity - pointing out the obvious is not trolling.
By the way- when I masturbate, it works every time. Impressed yet?
@m4ximusprim3: "In Internet slang, a troll is someone who posts controversial, inflammatory, irrelevant, or off-topic messages in an online community, such as an online discussion forum, chat room or blog, with the primary intent of provoking other users into an emotional response..."
You (along with others) seem to have taken my own opinion as a personal insult. Therefore, I just unintentionally trolled.
There are several theories that suggest that time travel is impossible because every time a time machine is invented people go to the past and mess something up, which causes it never to be invented.
So right after we discovered time travel someone went back in time and scared a crow eating a sandwich. The crow flew over a cooling vent and dropped bread into it and POOF no more time travel, yet again.
@Navin R Johnson: Well, the most accepted theories state time travel isn't yet in existence as both where travelling from and destination both need a functioning time machine.
What you suggested is a paradox: Someone travels back in time to stop the creation of a time machine THUS stopping themselves travelling back in time THUS the time machine is created [repeat x infinite] #lhcbaguetteincident
Exactly my point. This very paradox is what keep the LHC from operating!
If you believe that any time travel to the past would create such a paradox then it follows that any time line that contains an event which allows time travel to the past will have zero probability.
02:36 AM
03:16 AM
09:13 AM
01:30 PM
11/20/09
11/20/09
That's not to say the understanding of the physics has changed. The likelihood of the machine producing a blackhole which kills us all is still just as likely as the spontaneous transformation of every southpaw into a giant man-eating, airbreathing tunafish.
Still, I find the idea that the Higgs boson cannot exist free, and thus the LHC can never function properly, fascinating. It's not as outlandish as many thing.
11/20/09
01:31 PM
11/20/09
11/20/09
11/20/09
This makes me happy. The caption says "The sign at top warns of the presence of helium, argon and/or nitrogen in nearby pipes - gases that (if they leaked out) could displace oxygen and cause unconsciousness. "
11/20/09
11/20/09
11/20/09
that's the sign for a
Large Hard-on Collider
11/20/09
11/20/09
In a system this large, the statistical probability of initial failure is almost 1. They expected it to break, and now it's fixed again. It will probably break again, and they'll eep fixing it until it works.
11/20/09
11/20/09
11/20/09
11/20/09
11/20/09
By the way- when I masturbate, it works every time. Impressed yet?
11/20/09
11/20/09
You (along with others) seem to have taken my own opinion as a personal insult. Therefore, I just unintentionally trolled.
11/20/09
11/20/09
[www.timesonline.co.uk]
11/12/09
11/12/09
You will see something new
But first I must collide
Particle one and particle two #atlaspopupbook
11/12/09
[gizmodo.com] #atlaspopupbook
11/06/09
11/06/09
So right after we discovered time travel someone went back in time and scared a crow eating a sandwich. The crow flew over a cooling vent and dropped bread into it and POOF no more time travel, yet again.
11/06/09
What you suggested is a paradox: Someone travels back in time to stop the creation of a time machine THUS stopping themselves travelling back in time THUS the time machine is created [repeat x infinite] #lhcbaguetteincident
11/06/09
"What you suggested is a paradox"
Exactly my point. This very paradox is what keep the LHC from operating!
If you believe that any time travel to the past would create such a paradox then it follows that any time line that contains an event which allows time travel to the past will have zero probability.
Read: Novikov self-consistency principle
[en.wikipedia.org]
#lhcbaguetteincident
11/06/09
#RosaRocks