<![CDATA[Gizmodo: littoral combat ship]]> http://cache.gawker.com/assets/base/img/thumbs140x140/gizmodo.com.png <![CDATA[Gizmodo: littoral combat ship]]> http://gizmodo.com/tag/littoral combat ship http://gizmodo.com/tag/littoral combat ship <![CDATA[ Navy's Latest Anti-Pirate Defense Sadly Does Not Involve Ninjas ]]> Piracy on the high seas is a growing problem, so the Navy's latest lightweight fighter, the Littoral Combat ship, has a system specially designed to knock out pirates without killing them (so it obviously don't use ninjas). The Running-Gear Entanglement System, developed by the Coast Guard, is decidedly low-tech—basically a floating net that jams up smaller boats' propellers, leaving them stranded if they breach the perimeter, and easy targets for boarding.

Unfortunately, as Jesus points out, the dangling, 40-inch nylon loops that do the ensnaring don't exactly sound animal-friendly, especially if they get tangled and twisted. Unlike ninjas, who would kill pirates, and only pirates, with absolute precision. The Navy should look in to getting some. [Danger Room]

]]>
Tue, 30 Sep 2008 15:00:00 EDT matt buchanan http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5056875&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ U.S.S. Independence: A Triple Hulled, Weapon-Laden Monster That is Surprisingly Affordable ]]> Last month, the US Navy and General Dynamics took the lid off the new U.S.S. Independence littoral combat ship (LCS). This beast will sail close to the shore and throw everything imaginable at an enemy—from armored vehicles and helicopters to shells, torpedoes and missiles. Plus, it can hustle at a rumored 60 knots. Basically, that means the enemy will have a difficult time escaping the wrath of this mighty vessel no matter where they are.

Hell, you could be sitting in a Port-a-Potty in the middle of the desert and this thing would probably drop out of the sky hurling torpedoes up the toilet. And the best part is that the price tag tops out at only $208 million, which is fairly frugal for the US government. That's why the Navy plans on building 55 of them in the near future. [instapinch via DVICE]

]]>
Wed, 07 May 2008 19:10:00 EDT Sean Fallon http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=388227&view=rss&microfeed=true