m1093 - Gizmodo

posts about #m1093 more →
The Ultimate $250 Camera Shoot-Out

Your version of Internet Explorer is not supported. Please upgrade to the most recent version in order to view comments.

Dsmvwl Admin Promote to frontpage Approve user Ban user ×

mpacuk
12/04/08

In reply to The Ultimate $250 Camera Shoot-Out
Which camera did you use to take the picture of the cameras?
Reply

mpacuk was starred mpacuk was unstarred

Rabid Penguin
12/04/08

@mpacuk: Obviously the Canon. The Panasonic wouldn't have captured as much detail.
Reply

Rabid Penguin was starred Rabid Penguin was unstarred

iAirmanshirk
12/04/08

In reply to The Ultimate $250 Camera Shoot-Out
Ppl stll by cmrs?
Reply

iAirmanshirk was starred iAirmanshirk was unstarred

Rabid Penguin
12/04/08

@iFans, Gather behind me.: With this economy, anymore they just steal them. But I'm sure some people get nostalgic of the "good ol' days" when they used to pay for things.
Reply

Rabid Penguin was starred Rabid Penguin was unstarred

Lite: hates Illinois Nazis
12/04/08

In reply to The Ultimate $250 Camera Shoot-Out
This review wasn't at all gay until the balls touched...

Seriously though, I'm in the market for such a camera at the moment, and am glad to see this roundup here. =) Thanks giz!
Reply

max_k
12/04/08

In reply to The Ultimate $250 Camera Shoot-Out
Amazon says that the Canon SD790 is $189.98.

If you're really going to spend $250, I'd get the Canon SD880, which is $246, has the 3" screen and IS but a wider zoom range. Its widest angle is about a 28mm equivalent for a 35mm-style camera, which is a good wide-angle shot.

I always find myself wishing for more wide, and rarely for more zoom, especially when photographing drunk friends indoors at a party, etc. I actually have the 870, which is last year's version of this camera, and it doesn't beat my Nikon D90 (which I got last week, and is amazing) but its a great little camera that has IS for low-light shots, fits easily in a pocket, and takes great photographs.
Reply

max_k was starred max_k was unstarred

Mark Wilson
12/04/08

@max_k: Many of these cameras go for far lower than their $250 retail.
Reply

Mark Wilson was starred Mark Wilson was unstarred

admoseremic
12/04/08

In reply to The Ultimate $250 Camera Shoot-Out
Wow, very thorough. Once again, Canon rules the day. Thank you.
Reply

admoseremic was starred admoseremic was unstarred

rrwakc
12/04/08

@admoseremic: for that price I'd still prefered canon a590 which also has optical stabilizer (like one in some DSLR lenses) so you can take not-so blurry pictures in low light like concerts and parties from hand
Reply

rrwakc was starred rrwakc was unstarred

ceilingFANBOY
12/04/08

@rrwakc: It's not mentioned in the article, but I think this was only a test on ultra-compacts. You gain some features on the a590 (and oddly lose some, too) but the PowerShot aXXX series is much larger than the SD Elphs. I'm still using an SD400 which I like better than most of the newer ones. I don't take any pictures large enough to require a higher resolution. Noise at the highest ISO setting is really the only complaint I have.
Reply

ceilingFANBOY was starred ceilingFANBOY was unstarred

Earlier discussions Other discussions Show all discussions Show featured discussions only Start a new discussion

#m1093

Gizmodo

Gizmodo Team

SUBSCRIBE TO Gizmodo

The Ultimate $250 Camera Shoot-Out

Login

Reset Password

Register

Submit Your Comment