Gizmodo 
Enter your username and password.
Tip your editors:
tips@gizmodo.com
Editorial Director:
Brian Lam | Email | Twitter
Editor:
Jason Chen
Email | AIM | Twitter
Features Editor:
Wilson Rothman
Email | Twitter
Senior Contributing Editor:
Jesus Diaz
Email | AIM | Twitter
Mark Wilson, Reviews
Email | AIM | Twitter
Contributing Editors:
Matt Buchanan
Email | AIM | Twitter
Adam Frucci
Email | Twitter
Sean Fallon
Email | Twitter
Jack Loftus
Email | Twitter
John Herrman
Email | Twitter
Dan Nosowitz
Email
Chris Mascari
Email
Danny Allen
Email | Twitter
Columnist:
Brendan I. Koerner
Interns:
Don Nguyen
Email
Chris Jacob
Email
Comment Intern:
Nick Ellenoff | Email
Comment Account Questions:
Comments@gizmodo.com
Original material is licensed under a Creative Commons License permitting non-commercial sharing with attribution.
10/15/09
10/15/09
I'm thinking they'll release new iMacs to coincide with Windows 7. #macpro
10/15/09
Sometimes I wish I actually had a need for a workstation like this. I also wish I had a magic wand so I could just turn my aging Powermac MDD G4 into this. #macpro
10/15/09
C'mon... Until awesome games similar to the PC comes to the MAC, this would be futile.
Also, I can't think how much this would cost... x3 of what it would be if it was a PC?
Not being biased or PC-sided, but I was just wondering and thinking of the use and cost for this configuration. If there was really a good use for this (with a fairly good price), I would definitely buy this. #macpro
10/15/09
10/15/09
C'mon... Until awesome games similar to the PC comes to the MAC, this would be futile.
Also, I can't think how much this would cost... x3 of what it would be if it was a PC?
Not being biased or PC-sided, but I was just wondering and thinking of the use and cost for this configuration. If there was really a good use for this (with a fairly good price), I would definitely buy this. #macpro
10/15/09
As it is, musicians often supplement host-based software with PCI cards for extra horsepower. Having this kind of power built in means you can record and process more tracks with better effects that put a heavy load on the CPU, use more virtual instruments, etc. without buying additional hardware. #macpro
10/15/09
ahahaha, I was thinking this was somewhat for general public type of mac until I posted this comment... and I was lazy enough to correct myself. But anyways, I see more uses for this MAC powerhouse as a work machine, based on your replies, than what I have actually thought of.
Now, I see this as something that's really helpful at more points than what I thought of. #macpro
10/15/09
10/15/09
10/16/09
03/21/09
Heck my Core i7 system with an overclocked Nvidia 285 was only 2,100!
WTF man?
03/20/09
03/20/09
03/21/09
03/20/09
03/20/09
03/21/09
My 4runner can run on the very same race track as any vehicle though at 45mph versus 200mph for a car specifically made to race on said track.
03/20/09
My homemade gaming rig with 3X the power: $1200
Using my gaming rig for "everyday use" and still blowing Apple out of the water in a price/performance evaluation: Priceless.
03/21/09
Sure. FInal Cut Pro. YOU LOSE!
03/23/09
If FCP is all Mac has going for it in a flame war, that's pretty sad. While Mac Pro has a lot of great media creation and editing apps, it's certainly not the end-all be-all of the digital content creation world. In terms of cost-benefit, many studios do go with Mac, but as many also decide to go with Windows, Linux, or other platforms.
None is inherently better, but rather geared toward different production and rendering needs. It's not so much about which platform is better, but which is more suitable to the task at hand and offers the most ways to optimize the production pipelines. In many cases Linux or Windows is more flexible simply because it has a broader install base, wider hardware support base, and offers more content creation tools.
No currently available platform trumps all others in every contest. Even things such as rendering speed, and transcoding times are going to vary widely depending upon hardware configuration and the content being worked on. If you are doing professional editing for the film industry you are likely using the same (or very similar) external hardware anyway, which turns the decision into one of OS comfort and flexibility. The computer you are using is just a workstation then, farming out the real duties to dedicated hardware, which most often runs neither OSX nor Windows.
The fanboy argument of "FCP/Maya!! is not only silly, but also completely unfounded. There will always be fanboys who jump in claiming the work at/run/own some sort of studio, shouting how many Mac/Win/Linux platforms they run exclusively, as though that ends the argument. It doesn't. For every studio running all macs, there's another running Windows. I've worked in both OSX (on Mac Pros) and Windows (my laptop primarily) doing Photoshop work, and honestly,once I'm inside the application, there's little difference, in terms of speed and capability. I just don't use OSX often enough and I find the general style of it cumbersome because of my familiarity with Windows.
It comes down to comfort, familiarity with the platform and, most importantly, whether the oerson working the hardware has the brains, talent and enthusiasm to get the job done.
03/20/09
03/20/09
03/20/09
03/20/09
03/21/09
03/20/09
03/20/09
03/20/09
Intel Core i7 Extreme Edition 965 Nehalem 3.2GHz - $999
MSI X58 Pro LGA 1366 Intel X58 Motherboard - $190
G.SKILL 6GB (3 x 2GB) 240-Pin DDR3 - $89
SAMSUNG 1TB DRIVE - $89
Decent Case: $100
BluRay Burner - $189
Radeon 4870 X2 - $399
That all totals to approximately 2000, with room for upgrading to a second 4870x2, or 6 Gigs more RAM, or other such upgrades... the beauty of the PC is the fact that you CHOOSE WHAT YOU WANT!!!
Say you don't need the 3.2 GHz Processor... you'd be fine with a 2.93 GHz and would save $400 dollars...
Add On 4 more Terabyte drives with the money you save or buy yourself a whole lot of lap dances... you chose...
Macs are good for artists(where it is actually useful) and people who like to fool themselves into thinking they're safer behind a mac...
Oh and for about 300 bucks more from the build above you could probably get EFiX and OS X running on that machine if you really must have it...
03/20/09
03/21/09
03/20/09
*hides*
03/21/09
While Apple has never really pushed Gaming on their computers, possibly deterring devs from giving it their all, and due to the fact that there is more money to be had in the PC market with games having multi-million dollar movie-like budgets, very few games are made specifically for the Mac.
While it should be a bit easier with their Intel processors now (as this was a major factor for PPCs), the games are built from the ground up (or using a previous model/engine that was) for Windows the games are then eventually ported over to the Mac OS and as such can never truly be optimized for it (or you could say that because of tech like Direct X it just makes it that much better).
While it rarely happens, when companies put the extra effort into the Mac system (and then, even if it is eventually ported) to make it take advantage of the Macs features (or lack thereof) you end up with games like WoW (and every other Blizzard game) that run just as well, if not better, on the Mac OS.
03/21/09
03/20/09
Now the card is crap and barely worth gaming on?
03/20/09
03/20/09
03/20/09
03/20/09
Oh dear.
03/20/09
The GT120 is a rebadged 9500GT. If a 4870 can't give you a MAJOR performance boost over a 9500GT, there is something seriously wrong with your computer.
03/20/09
If that's right, that's fascinating. Same chipset, board design and memory specs? How can you be sure of this? Not challenging you, really just curious...
03/20/09
03/20/09
I dont like drama. Or confrontation. I hear that they give you AIDS
03/20/09
Ah, charming and entertaining as always, pizzlepaps! It has been SO long since we last chatted, let's DO catch up, shall we? Why, it seems like only yesterday we were recounting some of YOUR glorious past Gizmodo witticisms:
"ban this fgt imo"
"Are you a tard?"
"people wouldn't have to hate on gays so much if they weren't being such attention whores all they care about is me me me"
"fuck apple."
"and its retards like you that haven't got a clue how politics and money works."
"shit dude, got a stick up your ass?"
And I was MOST delighted to find you are branching out from Gizmodo, willing to expand your views to other Websites as well:
"...people don't like what isn't normal. being gay contradicts nature. humans live to reproduce and pass on dna. being gay prevents this from happening. adopting doesn't pass on dna, even if it could provide gays with a real family."
Oh--my!--I can hardly stop myself from chuckling! SO witty!
Well, it has been SO nice to hear from you again, p-paps. The delightful way you turn a phrase along with your views on gay rights, adoption and retarded people are just SO enlightening! DO let me know when next you are in the area so we can get together for some MORE raucous laughter!
Buh bye!
03/20/09
And a big, hearty WELCOME to yet another Facebooker! I, for one, am SO glad Gizmodo is not subjecting Facebook accounts to the pre-screening process that regular Gizmodo accounts go through. Why, if they did, we would have NEVER been able to enjoy your wildly entertaining and wittily-crafted comment!!!
03/20/09
03/20/09
Now, if those comments had actually been witty or funny or clever or informative or whatever, I could have easily cut them slack for otherwise non-politically-correct ramblings. But they weren't any of those things.
03/22/09
Having said that, this facebook hating thing has got to take a rest. At the end of the day we are all individuals with common interests, so there really is no reason why we all shouldn't get along. I understand that there have been a lot of weak comments by us "facebookers", I guess thats just what happens when you open up the discussion to a greater (far more casual audience). Although I believe this makes up a small percentage of facebook users that look at this site. I was under the impression that just about everybody had a facebook account.
I agree with you that this is a gadget blog and therefore comments should be gadget related. I also apologize for wasting everybodies time with this post. I am just sick and tired of all this static sourrounding facebook users. If you think I am being an asshole, call me an asshole, but that has nothing to do with the social networking site that I perfer. At the end of the day, we are all just people who enjoy reading about gadgets.
Anyway, sorry once again for wasting everybodies time, and I am also truely sorry if I offended anybody, it really wasnt my intention.
@bosskev:
03/22/09
Now. Facebook. Although you would not necessarily have seen my comments elsewhere, here, for the record, is my 2¢:
• I am a Facebooker myself. Love it. Use it daily. Go, Facebook!
• I welcome all Facebookers to Gizmodo. I really do, the more the merrier.
BUT...
• I strongly desire that the existing Gizmodo policy--that of allowing comments to appear only after a user's account has been approved for commenting--be applied equally to ALL new commenters, regardless of source or who they are.
That's it. That's my soapbox. Hopefully Gizmodo (Gawker) will take action that will resolve this conflict to everybody's fairness and satisfaction.