@shorty63136: Did you even READ the very first sentence?
"The following is an unpaid, untrue advertisement for the Zero G spice rack, which, incidentally, is real $44 product at Yanko Design selling under a slightly different name."
@shorty63136: It's the internet! Common practices such as 'courtesy' and 'politeness' don't exist on the internet! It's far more important to get that sarcastic "look how much smarter I am than you" jab than to be a decent human being. #zerogspicerack
These are the crappiest pictures of a floating mouse I've ever seen. Were these taken by the same person that goes around taking pictures of rumored upcoming iPhones?
I've been experimenting with a different approach - pulling oneSELF up by one's bootstraps. My primary stumbling block at the moment is procuring tiny boots for the mice.
So they are close to explaining why the hoverboards didn't work on water...something the high powered magnet pushing the water away causing them to lose inertia...interesting...sorry...back the future geek moment. Maybe the hoverboard itself was filled with water...:-)
@aquajaws: actually the hoverboards didn't work on water because there wasn't any way for Marty to 'push off' on the liquid... if he had a paddle he would have been fine.
@wishnias: And it won't work with this method because the water will just change shape around the column of "flotation".....you'd just have columns of air surrounded by the water.
@DustyButtâ˘:
My first though exactly!.
If you can create an antigravity electromagnetic field you should be able to create a gravity field.
In which case one of the biggest hurdles in space travel would be solved.
With the loss of gravity, fluids in the body moved around too much, bone loss begins to set in a rate of nearly 1% per month in space without HEAVY exercise (threadmill, weight (mass) lifting (moving),etc...
The New C.O.L.B.E.R.T. might not be necessary in the future...
This news is fascinating.
Besides, a great prank on the space station would be to switch someone's gravity field in reverse while on toilet duty!
@D.E.P.C.: I want your body.:
I think the power issue is not an issue at all if the finally decide to have the balls of putting a hefty nuclear reactor in orbit or on a ship.
This is a great read: [www.space4peace.org]
Interesting anyways... if the can have 2 kilowatts of power in relatively small satallites, you can see that a moderate size reactor could provide ample power.
I think you've been watching 2001 and 2010 too many times.
Yes, I do agree that the centripeal force of a rotating section could solve the issue too, but in reality, it would be a frikking cabling and piping mightmare for anyone building such ship.
IF you consider to sping the whole ship then, I hate to be the pilot or just watch out a window.
Plus, as @jasonliang: pointed out the energy wasted would be just as bad.
@powell.442: You can still call it anti-gravity because it is generating an force to counter the force of gravity. nuf said. Anti-gravity does not have to mean neutralization of gravitons or some such quantum affect... unless you define the constraints of the experiment to be such.
generating a force that opposes gravity is not anti-gravity - only generating a force that negates the effects gravity is anti-gravity. this does not negate the effects of gravity, it opposes them. though the mouse floats, the mouse itself still feels a downward pull. levitation doesn't cause the sensation of weightlessness, which is the simplest litmus test for gravity negating vs gravity opposing forces.
10/15/09
10/15/09
"The following is an unpaid, untrue advertisement for the Zero G spice rack, which, incidentally, is real $44 product at Yanko Design selling under a slightly different name."
Yeesh... #zerogspicerack
10/16/09
Yeesh. #zerogspicerack
10/16/09
10/16/09
10/16/09
2 - And whooo's polluting with comments?
3 - If you also notice, Yanko is good for having things that are simply concepts and never become actual products. #zerogspicerack
10/15/09
10/15/09
I prefer the magnetic spice racks where you can see the contents. #zerogspicerack
10/15/09
@PurpleMonkeyDishwasher: : #zerogspicerack
10/15/09
09/11/09
09/10/09
09/10/09
09/10/09
09/10/09
09/10/09
@deliciousburglar: Exhibit A: Failed attempt at anti-gravity.
09/10/09
09/10/09
09/10/09
09/10/09
09/10/09
Made me think think of this classic flash sort-of-game.
09/10/09
I have lots of fond memories from that site. No thirteen y/o boy should grow up in the age of the Internet without joecartoon, or an equivalent.
09/10/09
09/10/09
09/10/09
09/10/09
09/10/09
09/10/09
09/10/09
My first though exactly!.
If you can create an antigravity electromagnetic field you should be able to create a gravity field.
In which case one of the biggest hurdles in space travel would be solved.
With the loss of gravity, fluids in the body moved around too much, bone loss begins to set in a rate of nearly 1% per month in space without HEAVY exercise (threadmill, weight (mass) lifting (moving),etc...
The New C.O.L.B.E.R.T. might not be necessary in the future...
This news is fascinating.
Besides, a great prank on the space station would be to switch someone's gravity field in reverse while on toilet duty!
09/10/09
or you can, you know, spin the ship and just use centripetal force to simulate gravity...
09/10/09
I think the power issue is not an issue at all if the finally decide to have the balls of putting a hefty nuclear reactor in orbit or on a ship.
This is a great read: [www.space4peace.org]
Interesting anyways... if the can have 2 kilowatts of power in relatively small satallites, you can see that a moderate size reactor could provide ample power.
@nutbastard: back from burningman:
I think you've been watching 2001 and 2010 too many times.
Yes, I do agree that the centripeal force of a rotating section could solve the issue too, but in reality, it would be a frikking cabling and piping mightmare for anyone building such ship.
IF you consider to sping the whole ship then, I hate to be the pilot or just watch out a window.
Plus, as @jasonliang: pointed out the energy wasted would be just as bad.
09/10/09
09/10/09
09/10/09
09/10/09
09/10/09
09/10/09
09/10/09
Initiating Text Sequence: Excessive Continuance. Sequence Stable, Begin Handoff in 5, 4, 3, 2, 1...
09/10/09
generating a force that opposes gravity is not anti-gravity - only generating a force that negates the effects gravity is anti-gravity. this does not negate the effects of gravity, it opposes them. though the mouse floats, the mouse itself still feels a downward pull. levitation doesn't cause the sensation of weightlessness, which is the simplest litmus test for gravity negating vs gravity opposing forces.