I don't know why this is such a big deal. Are you really demonizing Google for telling people about products they had a hand in creating? #googlehomepagedroidad
Don't worry, Rosa - they just added the ad because they were feeling lucky. Besides, clearly Ernie and Burt are supervising the gig now, and how could you mistrust Ernie and Burt? Of course, without the rubber ducky, they are a little bit suspect, I suppose. #googlehomepagedroidad
I'm shocked - SHOCKED! - that a global corporation that derives the bulk of its revenue from advertising would stoop so low as to advertise a product. #googlehomepagedroidad
Well, the minimalist homepage is still there for me. Stuff only shows up when I move my cursor. Ad included.
And unless I'm mistaken (and I could be, I rarely hit the actual Google homepage), that spot typically has a link to some kind of Google service or another with a Learn More link. Only difference is this is one of the few that costs money.
Call me crazy, but I've seen worse things. You know, like Windows coming bundled with Internet Explorer. Or baby kittens playing in a paper bag. Or happiness.
As promotions go, surely this rates as one of the least intrusive or visually objectionable. Admittedly, I guess I'm a bit biased, as I like Google and Android quite a bit... of course, I never see that page, because I default to iGoogle, or use the searchbar from Chrome, or my phone. #googlehomepagedroidad
@Aetius: Then brothers we shall be! Just remember, I'm the evil brother who will sell you out to save my own skin. I fully expect you to say something moving and profound (that may, or may not, cause me to rethink my selfish ways) as you lay there gurgling and choking on your own blood, with a sword sticking out of your gut. So, still on board? We good? #googlehomepagedroidad
@met2art: Hmm...something moving and profound. Nope nothing comes to mind. I can, however, pull out a random Simpsons quote -
Homer - "Is the poop-deck what I think it is?"
Admiral - "Haha I like the cut of your jib, young man"
Homer - "What's a jib?"
Admiral - "Hahaha. Promote that man" #googlehomepagedroidad
question: How many Newtons does it take to change a lightbulb?
answer: Farm
We had armed our sales staff with $15k worth of these 'lil gadjets way back when, and they were placed in paperweight mode within 2 weeks. They were the joke of the industry when released, and still to this day I laugh whenever I think of the name.
The UI was so bad we used to have contests to seel who's could fuck-up a client list or data pack worse, and there were many, many ties.
The boss got a bit upset when he realized none of us were using the Newtons after a month, and when we asked him to show us what we were doing wrong his reply was "I don't have to use these damned thngs, I just have to pay for them"- it seems he never really got the hang of using his either.
Of course, the patent tries to be as general as possible about the implementation, but the main gist is that when the earpiece is close to your ear as opposed to free air, "back pressure" (what the patent calls "acoustic load") ultimately affects the impedance of the earpiece. A circuit in the phone detects the change in impedance and turns the music off or on.
What I find a bit odd about this, and I didn't read the patent closely, is how the invention detects the impedance transition without actually emitting sound. I can see how, if it were playing music and you removed the earpiece it would be detectable. But if the earpiece is out and you insert it, how would you know unless you played a sound to detect the impedance.
Maybe there's a different embodiment that detects skin resistance. Actually, if I were doing it, I'd use the elasto-resistive properties that many foams have, whether earbuds or the "spongy" foam rubber used in some over-the-ear models. You could easily detect when the foam was compressed by a change in resistance. You could then impress a DC offset on the AC audio signal and detect it with a comparator.
11/06/09
I don't know why this is such a big deal. Are you really demonizing Google for telling people about products they had a hand in creating? #googlehomepagedroidad
11/06/09
11/06/09
11/06/09
11/06/09
11/06/09
11/06/09
11/06/09
11/06/09
11/06/09
11/06/09
And unless I'm mistaken (and I could be, I rarely hit the actual Google homepage), that spot typically has a link to some kind of Google service or another with a Learn More link. Only difference is this is one of the few that costs money.
Call me crazy, but I've seen worse things. You know, like Windows coming bundled with Internet Explorer. Or baby kittens playing in a paper bag. Or happiness.
11/06/09
11/06/09
11/06/09
11/06/09
Homer - "Is the poop-deck what I think it is?"
Admiral - "Haha I like the cut of your jib, young man"
Homer - "What's a jib?"
Admiral - "Hahaha. Promote that man" #googlehomepagedroidad
11/06/09
09/28/09
09/28/09
09/28/09
question: How many Newtons does it take to change a lightbulb?
answer: Farm
We had armed our sales staff with $15k worth of these 'lil gadjets way back when, and they were placed in paperweight mode within 2 weeks. They were the joke of the industry when released, and still to this day I laugh whenever I think of the name.
The UI was so bad we used to have contests to seel who's could fuck-up a client list or data pack worse, and there were many, many ties.
The boss got a bit upset when he realized none of us were using the Newtons after a month, and when we asked him to show us what we were doing wrong his reply was "I don't have to use these damned thngs, I just have to pay for them"- it seems he never really got the hang of using his either.
09/28/09
09/28/09
09/28/09
09/28/09
Newton Man, flying on a plane? Oh god, I don't know the words to that song. XD
09/16/09
09/16/09
Of course, the patent tries to be as general as possible about the implementation, but the main gist is that when the earpiece is close to your ear as opposed to free air, "back pressure" (what the patent calls "acoustic load") ultimately affects the impedance of the earpiece. A circuit in the phone detects the change in impedance and turns the music off or on.
What I find a bit odd about this, and I didn't read the patent closely, is how the invention detects the impedance transition without actually emitting sound. I can see how, if it were playing music and you removed the earpiece it would be detectable. But if the earpiece is out and you insert it, how would you know unless you played a sound to detect the impedance.
Maybe there's a different embodiment that detects skin resistance. Actually, if I were doing it, I'd use the elasto-resistive properties that many foams have, whether earbuds or the "spongy" foam rubber used in some over-the-ear models. You could easily detect when the foam was compressed by a change in resistance. You could then impress a DC offset on the AC audio signal and detect it with a comparator.
09/16/09
09/16/09
Will it change my life the way that my iPhone did?
09/16/09
Plugging earphones in turns the player on if it's off and pulling them out causes the Zune to pause the music so you don't miss anything.
Welcome to 2-3 years ago Sony.
09/16/09