Come now, no one rounds to 3! It's always either 3.14 or 3.141592.
I've NEVER heard if anyone rounding to anything other than those two "versions" of pi, personally. Obviously for scientific purposes, you might want more digits. But dear god, 2.5 trillion "sig figs"? That's ridiculous. I can't imagine anything needing to be precise to 2.5 trillion digits...
@TuxBobble: it's a question of scale. Most people choose not to attempt to comprehend what massively complex mathematical equations may benefit from such information.
on the other hand, the mere thought that pi's decimal may repeat somewhere... in the seemingly infinite chaos of random numerals would be, to a mathematician and scientist, akin to irrefutably proving the existence of God.
@bucklefilledbird: "Some say the world will end in fire;
Some say in ice.
From what I've tasted of desire
I hold with those who favor fire.
But if it had to perish twice,
I think I know enough of hate
To know that for destruction ice
Is also great
And would suffice." -Robert Frost
"If the Universe was, indeed, created by an intelligent being, then it is the fever-dream of a statistician." -Me.
Was the old record still from Distributed.net? I don't see it in the wiki history, but I remember back in the day they ran a side project for it and a guy in Plymouth MI hit it. It was around 98 maybe?
someone explain to me without being a douche, why the hell they cant just keep projecting the equation forever and forever... is it possible to figure out some code that keeps going with the string of numbers? making anything like this kinda blaze? if it is a infinite string of numbers, how come we cant just have it constantly evolving and never ending?
@AstroWolf: because, those numbers take up space, and as it stands they take up a whopping 25 terabytes. They could have easily kept going and going and going but it really wouldnt ahve been worth it in terms of system resource use. I would imagine they would use something much more speedy than a harddrive because of I/O needs which would have cost mucho $$$$
I mean sure we could do it, but im sure this computer is going on to do much more important things where such precision in pi isnt needed.
@AstroWolf: I would say, that as computers get faster and faster, it actually becomes more cost effective to start over with a new supercomputer than to keep it going on an old system. Imagine if we were still using punch-cards to calculate pi. Now imagine how much faster an x86 processor can do it.
Then imagine several x86's linked together.
Then several multi-core processors.
Then a supercomputer with hundreds of cores
then thousands
then tens of thousands.
It's like the pink dragon. You keep chasing it. But you never CATCH the dragon!
@Curves: Did you know there's a person in China (Chao Lu) who was able to recite Pi up to 67,890 positions? For a non repeating never ending number, that's pretty impressive.
Heliophage promoted this comment
Edited by OldSchoolGadgetLover at 08/18/09 10:42 AM
OldSchoolGadgetLover was starred
OldSchoolGadgetLover was unstarred
@MacBandit: I totaly admit to copping out and asking an engineer when I need to know that sort of thing (which I rarely need to know). I have a designated "go to" math guy for anything that doesnt have a $ in front of it. I can do ANYTHING with a $ on it. I suitably reward my math (and hardware) guys with brownies or some such treat.
@Curves: wow, i can't think of a time when the answer to a crossword puzzle clue was only 2 letters long. always thought that was kind of a no-no when it came to crosswords.
@stre: This was on a "newsletter" written by an accident prone receptionist from my doctors office. She always had some theme to the puzzles and that one was about pie.
@Purple Monkey Dishwasher: And wiki says that you only need 39 places for a circle the size of the observable universe to the precision of a hydrogen atom
@RJackson: The number itself has no practical use. They just wanted to see how many decimal places they could get with their computer within that time span.
08/18/09
08/18/09
08/18/09
08/18/09
08/18/09
08/18/09
I've NEVER heard if anyone rounding to anything other than those two "versions" of pi, personally. Obviously for scientific purposes, you might want more digits. But dear god, 2.5 trillion "sig figs"? That's ridiculous. I can't imagine anything needing to be precise to 2.5 trillion digits...
08/18/09
on the other hand, the mere thought that pi's decimal may repeat somewhere... in the seemingly infinite chaos of random numerals would be, to a mathematician and scientist, akin to irrefutably proving the existence of God.
08/18/09
Some say in ice.
From what I've tasted of desire
I hold with those who favor fire.
But if it had to perish twice,
I think I know enough of hate
To know that for destruction ice
Is also great
And would suffice." -Robert Frost
"If the Universe was, indeed, created by an intelligent being, then it is the fever-dream of a statistician." -Me.
08/18/09
Hell getting old, my brain is overflowing :(
08/18/09
08/18/09
is this naive of me to ask?
08/18/09
I mean sure we could do it, but im sure this computer is going on to do much more important things where such precision in pi isnt needed.
08/18/09
Then imagine several x86's linked together.
Then several multi-core processors.
Then a supercomputer with hundreds of cores
then thousands
then tens of thousands.
It's like the pink dragon. You keep chasing it. But you never CATCH the dragon!
08/18/09
@DeusExMach believes you have his stapler:
08/18/09
Exactly what I was thinking. Now they need Rehab Hero!
08/18/09
08/18/09
08/18/09
@FriarNurgle: NERDS!
08/18/09
08/18/09
08/18/09
What's sad is that if I were even trying to make up a 67,890 digit long sequence of numbers, I would probably start repeating a pattern. :/
08/18/09
I use it fairly frequently. For some reason I'm always needing to know the diameter or in the opposite situation the circumference of something.
08/18/09
08/18/09
08/18/09
(pumpkins the best)
08/18/09
Yeah you only need to know a couple decimal places for most calculations.
08/18/09
08/18/09
08/18/09
08/18/09
08/18/09
08/18/09
08/18/09
08/18/09
Then they know their algorithm was wrong, and they wasted all that time and money. Which would be hilarious.
08/18/09
It's infinite and non-repeating.
08/18/09
How do you know? Are you a god?
08/18/09
08/18/09
Oh, and by the way the answer is always. Yes, yes I am a god. ;-)
08/18/09
*hey, i can have a world record with a 1 in 10 chance of being correct.*
08/18/09
08/18/09
@met2art: Showing work is overrated.
08/15/09
Any mathematical model for a zombie outbreak in Cannada needs to take into account the role played by sasquatch.
08/15/09
Now, the wendigo... THERE'S a possible counterattack. Unless they're infectable - in which case - game over man.. game over.
08/14/09