Gizmodo 
Enter your username and password.
Tip your editors:
Editorial Director:
Brian Lam | | Twitter
Editor:
Jason Chen
| AIM | Twitter
Features Editor:
Wilson Rothman
| Twitter
Senior Contributing Editors:
Jesus Diaz
| AIM | Twitter
Mark Wilson, Reviews
| AIM | Twitter
Contributing Editors:
Matt Buchanan
| AIM | Twitter
Adam Frucci
| Twitter
Sean Fallon
| Twitter
Jack Loftus
| Twitter
John Herrman
| Twitter
Dan Nosowitz
Chris Mascari
Kat Hannaford
| Twitter
Rosa Golijan
| Twitter
Chris Jacob
Columnist:
Brendan I. Koerner
Interns:
Don Nguyen
Kyle VanHemert
Comment Account Questions:
Original material is licensed under a Creative Commons License permitting non-commercial sharing with attribution.
03/10/09
03/10/09
and 640k ought to be enough memory for anyone, too. :)
03/10/09
Obviously if there is some new radical change in how we view photos that could change, but for the way things are now he's right.
03/10/09
I apologize for offending you, manager of Olympus Imaging's SLR planning department.
03/10/09
03/10/09
I agree. I'm not a photographer, but I like to get creative once in a while. I've been rocking a Sony DSC-P150 7MP point-n-shoot for I don't know how many years now. For my purposes it captures great detail, and even though I can't save raw, every JPG that comes off it is still around 3MB, so my few photos take up considerable space.
I can understand pro photographers using 20MP and higher cameras as I've seen them do, but as an average consumer, I'd probably only go above 7MP if my camera broke and I found a newer higher-res one for a decent price.
03/10/09
...though I would love to have things like built-in HDR, extreme low-light shooting, or shutter speeds that don't require me to hold my camera still like a sniper to prevent blur.