Senior Contributing Editors:
Jesus Diaz
| AIM | Twitter
Mark Wilson, Reviews
| AIM | Twitter
Contributing Editors:
Matt Buchanan | AIM | Twitter
Adam Frucci | Twitter
Sean Fallon | Twitter
Jack Loftus | Twitter
John Herrman | Twitter
Dan Nosowitz
Chris Mascari
Danny Allen | Twitter
Rosa Golijan | Twitter
Chris Jacob
It's too bad... I spent the last two years dreaming up excuses to get one. I think my favorite excuse was using it as a wireless touchscreen controller along with a minicube computer running a DAW and software synths for a USB keyboard. Perhaps the execution would have been as impractical as the concept was cool, but if I have to spend more than $200 to find out then the idea isn't that cool anyway.
"Mostly though I’m just sad. I never envisioned the CrunchPad as a huge business. I just wanted a tablet computer that I could use to consume the Internet while sitting on a couch."
I hate to say it but that was a fundamental flaw in TechCrunches thinking. It is and will be a Huge Business, Apple and others are chomping at the bit to get a device like this into the market, whoever does this first (and well) will reap big $$$.
And this is why is sounds like TechCrunch fell prey to predatory investors. Those bastards have no soul when it comes to ideas, it all about profit.
It sounds like TechCrunch could have used a good Patent Attorney along time ago.
@Bertone77: I suspect that is Arrington's way of casting himself in a more sympathetic light, rather than an admission that he didn't protect himself legally. He says in the article that they own the IP jointly and that he fully intends to sue the pants off of everyone shortly.
Wow. That's a very interesting twist. I have no idea whether I should believe Arrington's explanation - I don't have any personal reason to distrust him, but I generally don't believe just one source, especially when that source tries to present a hero-vs-villain story (and the source is the hero). That said, it's sad that the CrunchPad is dead. I was looking forward to it. I guess I'll have to take a closer look at the Archos devices, or one of the thousand other devices coming out running Android or whatever.
12/04/09
12/04/09
12/04/09
11/30/09
/laporte
What a bummer though, really.
11/30/09
11/30/09
They would have had a great niche product here. Now, they're just going to have a ton of legal headaches.
11/30/09
11/30/09
I hate to say it but that was a fundamental flaw in TechCrunches thinking. It is and will be a Huge Business, Apple and others are chomping at the bit to get a device like this into the market, whoever does this first (and well) will reap big $$$.
And this is why is sounds like TechCrunch fell prey to predatory investors. Those bastards have no soul when it comes to ideas, it all about profit.
It sounds like TechCrunch could have used a good Patent Attorney along time ago.
/sadface
11/30/09
11/30/09
11/30/09
11/30/09
OK...unless it is really cool and cost $100. Then all principles are put on hold for the want of cool tech gear.
Christ, we interns are so easily corrupted.
11/30/09
07/15/09
07/15/09
07/15/09
* shifts tongue to other side of cheek *
07/15/09
07/15/09
07/15/09
07/04/09
07/04/09