Senior Contributing Editors:
Jesus Diaz
| AIM | Twitter
Mark Wilson, Reviews
| AIM | Twitter
Contributing Editors:
Matt Buchanan | AIM | Twitter
Adam Frucci | Twitter
Sean Fallon | Twitter
Jack Loftus | Twitter
John Herrman | Twitter
Dan Nosowitz
Chris Mascari
Kat Hannaford | Twitter
Rosa Golijan | Twitter
Chris Jacob
I just spent yesterday at a symposium at the National Institutes of Health, they were honoring my boss for his work deciphering the genetic code. One of the scientists who spoke and I had the honor of meeting was Craig Venter. He was the guy who did the Human Genome Project, he was also the man who created the first fully synthetic bacterial life, and the guy who is engineering algae for Exon Mobile ($300 M Grant) to fix CO2 and turn it into biofuel using only the energy from the sun. He spoke about the possibilities for the future of synthetic microbiology, and about the ethical questions which have been asked pertaining to his work. He believes that if the progress continues at its current rate (he predicts it will speed up) we may have synthetic viruses which are engineered to augment our immune systems against diseases we fail to naturally defeat, (Rhino Virus, HIV, etc...). The difficulty of creating complex synthetic life is mind boggling but recent results which his institute have obtained (not yet published) show serious promise for the future of the tech. The moral and ethical dilemma continues but as long as society continues to make educated decisions and allow exploratory research I think the future holds great promise.
Ahhh Frankenfood. I am glad to see that the thrust of this is that Both sides for the political isle are filled with hapless techno-weenies.
As for the possibility of destroying the Earth...early on some scientists were convinced that a nuclear detonation would incinerate all the atmosphere of Earth, they detonated the devices anyway.
As for can we destroy mankind with a virus....hat just comes down to Hubris. We believe we are great and powerful, and we are taking our first steps to being so....but we are not all powerful.
We need to get over our scared kid locked in a dark closet phase with biotech. We are moving towards a better world... I want it to happen.
just wait til this tech hits the household, and droves of people download and compile organisms that will, say, secrete opiates or blow you, or both. #syntheticbiology
Well, just think of it as our modern day version of, "Burn the witch at the stake". I mean folks back then were shunned, exiled and/or executed for saying that our planet was round. For anyone to think that society as evolved, WRONG! We're still stuck back in 1492, racism included!!! #syntheticbiology
I agree with just about everything in the article except for the "who pounds the gavel" question. The article was rational until we got to that point.
Specter is correct to point out the groups silliness in attempting to ban this or that, but then it totally flies over his head that maybe the ACTUAL problem is that we permit this to be a political decision at all. THAT is irrational in my point. If party A and party B want to do business with each other and they agree to the terms, then what the hell right does some party C have to say "no you're not allowed to do that". Even going past the fact that for C to even be able to make that case he must assume to have some sort of property right over the persons A or B (since he is in fact telling them what they can and cannot do with their property, thus inferring an ownership power), what the hell makes party C so special that they should have that authority? Are they super beings who have some magical ability to say that some market exchange is "wrong"?
Perhaps the answer should be to get the government out of scientific research entirely, and instead just give back that tax money and let individuals fund what they want. then the only question to ask would be "ok, who owns this?" "they do?" "ok then, it is their decision". End of story. #syntheticbiology
@slim934: Your opinion is valid, but that doesn't actually change the fact that this is, currently, how these decisions get made. The article remains rational, though the world as it is portayed in the article may not be (at least, not to your liking). #syntheticbiology
I'm all for this type of research. Hopefully before we die they'll find out how to fix us up rather than just manipulating the genetics of future generations. I mean, why should they get all the fun? I want my super-powers dammit! #syntheticbiology
I think it should be noted that anti-vaccine people are bipartisanly crazy (see Glenn Beck and Joe Scarborough).
And while there's nothing wrong with genetically modified crops, there is a problem with Monsanto's control of the market and their anti-competitive behavior. #syntheticbiology
@DNABio: The problem is they will take a good amount of non-crazies with them. Not all Americans have access to vaccines, whether they be old or young, while most in the anti-vaccine camp are in fact middle class or better. People who can afford to be anti-vaccine can usually also afford heathcare for when they do get sick (an they will get sick). By avoiding routine vaccinations, anti-vaccine proponents take away from societies herd immunity (whereby a vaccinated person essentially stops the chain of infection by being immune and thereby protecting those un-vaccinated around them). Anti-vaccine people really are a cancer on society. #syntheticbiology
Clearly the only way to resolve the science vs. religion/conservatism argument is to create an army of cloned Jesus... Jesuses... Jesi? Finally, we will all be united by this most holy of blasphemies. #syntheticbiology
We don't watch zombie movies because they are such an accurate portrayal of a potential future, and we shouldn't treat synthetic biology like a deadly fantasy when the reality is anything but. #syntheticbiology
If you're on this site you probably agree with 95-100% of what Specter is talking about.
Why people try to hinder any kind of progress is beyond me. Instead of the old "If it ain't broke" mentality....we should always be thinking..."How can we make this better" Everything has room for improvement! #syntheticbiology
I don't think it matters if the research is could lead to the "Worst Case scenario", like Mr. Specter says, someone somewhere will be doing it so it might as well be us. #syntheticbiology
I'm sorry, but even if his points are valid and he presents a good argument, I am more afraid of that "Worst Case scenario" then cancer. Or the lack of resources.
I mean, zombies aren't that bad, but a biological disaster that wipes out the universe keeps me up at night.
@Arnold Qin: The thing you have to keep in mind is, the "worst case scenario" has the odds of a coin toss coming out heads 1000 times in a row, whereas the cancer in 50 years, well, that's more like heads 3 times in a row. So it's more about weighing likelihoods than weighing potential devastation. #syntheticbiology
@Wilson Rothman: That's exactly the point Specter is trying to make. For instance, you drive your car to and from work, or maybe you take the bus or subway, but you're willing to do it despite the risks. Thousands of people die in car wrecks every year. Hundreds of thousands more get injured each year. There are risks associated with driving your car, but the benefits outweigh the risks. People are willing to take the risk of death or injury to be able to get to and from their jobs.
Bottom line, there are risks involved with everything and more often than not, the greater the risk, the greater the reward. We should embrace those risks to be able to understand them so we can prevent them from happening. Keep your friends close, but your enemies closer... #syntheticbiology
@Arnold Qin: I wouldn't lose any sleep over the potential of a genetic mutation wiping out humanity. Hell, I work on them everyday and I'm still here. The ability to create an airborne virus with no resistance is close to impossible and is impossible based on our current knowledge. #syntheticbiology
@Wilson Rothman: I am pro-progress and pursuing literally everything. But, just to be argumentative, a thought against "progress" would be that it's a reverse Pascal's wager. Even if there is the remotest chance of wiping out the planet we shouldn't do it.
Then again, Pascal's wager never held any sway on me, so whatever. #syntheticbiology
11/13/09
[www.ted.com]
This talk was from last year but outlines that kind of work which Venter is involved in. It is relevant to this post on synthetic biology.
11/13/09
As for the possibility of destroying the Earth...early on some scientists were convinced that a nuclear detonation would incinerate all the atmosphere of Earth, they detonated the devices anyway.
As for can we destroy mankind with a virus....hat just comes down to Hubris. We believe we are great and powerful, and we are taking our first steps to being so....but we are not all powerful.
We need to get over our scared kid locked in a dark closet phase with biotech. We are moving towards a better world... I want it to happen.
11/13/09
11/13/09
11/13/09
Specter is correct to point out the groups silliness in attempting to ban this or that, but then it totally flies over his head that maybe the ACTUAL problem is that we permit this to be a political decision at all. THAT is irrational in my point. If party A and party B want to do business with each other and they agree to the terms, then what the hell right does some party C have to say "no you're not allowed to do that". Even going past the fact that for C to even be able to make that case he must assume to have some sort of property right over the persons A or B (since he is in fact telling them what they can and cannot do with their property, thus inferring an ownership power), what the hell makes party C so special that they should have that authority? Are they super beings who have some magical ability to say that some market exchange is "wrong"?
Perhaps the answer should be to get the government out of scientific research entirely, and instead just give back that tax money and let individuals fund what they want. then the only question to ask would be "ok, who owns this?" "they do?" "ok then, it is their decision". End of story. #syntheticbiology
11/13/09
11/13/09
11/13/09
11/13/09
And while there's nothing wrong with genetically modified crops, there is a problem with Monsanto's control of the market and their anti-competitive behavior. #syntheticbiology
11/13/09
11/13/09
11/13/09
11/13/09
So Daniel Clowes had it right. #syntheticbiology
11/13/09
11/13/09
Why people try to hinder any kind of progress is beyond me. Instead of the old "If it ain't broke" mentality....we should always be thinking..."How can we make this better" Everything has room for improvement! #syntheticbiology
11/13/09
Nah, I agree with you. There's always room for improvement. #syntheticbiology
11/13/09
11/13/09
11/13/09
11/13/09
I mean, zombies aren't that bad, but a biological disaster that wipes out the universe keeps me up at night.
11/13/09
11/13/09
Bottom line, there are risks involved with everything and more often than not, the greater the risk, the greater the reward. We should embrace those risks to be able to understand them so we can prevent them from happening. Keep your friends close, but your enemies closer... #syntheticbiology
11/13/09
11/13/09
11/13/09
11/13/09
Then again, Pascal's wager never held any sway on me, so whatever. #syntheticbiology