<![CDATA[Gizmodo: missiles]]> http://tags.gizmodo.com/assets/base/img/thumbs140x140/gizmodo.com.png <![CDATA[Gizmodo: missiles]]> http://gizmodo.com/tag/missiles http://gizmodo.com/tag/missiles <![CDATA[US Military Wants Armed Spy Bots in Intercontinental Ballistic Missiles]]> The problem: The US Army—purveyors of all things camouflage green— thinks that spy planes are too slow to recognize remote battlegrounds. The solution: Intercontinental Ballistic Missiles loaded with weaponized spy bots. The side-effect: World War III.

See, the US Army is right. ICBMs are the fastest way to deploy ISR-Intelligence, Surveillance and Reconnaissance-spy bots. They only take minutes to launch and reach a target anywhere in the world. Loading them with spy bots will provide with access to real-time data about any conflict area, in virtually no time:

ISR platforms delivered from missiles can potentially provide battlefield information that is only seconds old when transmitted from long ranges. This information is particularly valuable since it is so current. It provides the potential for striking a very mobile enemy before he has time to alter his position.

But then, ICBMs usually carry a much dangerous load: Nuclear warheads. You can be sure that the the Russians—or the Chinese or the North Koreans—won't be happy about detecting an ICBM launch off Alaska. That's exactly the reason why other similar efforts pioneered by Darpa were scrapped. The US Army boffins, however, say they have a plan to avoid the confusion: Use a different kind of ICBM.

How different that missile could be? A ballistic missile is a ballistic missile. They follow a trajectory across oceans and continents to open and drop whatever load they have, being that nukes, spy bots, or cotton candy. Then, the Army also says that they want the spy bots to be fully armed, just in case they want to strike seconds after they find the enemy.

See, that still doesn't sound like a good idea to me. Like the old Russian proverb says: "If it walks like a duck, quacks like a duck, looks like a duck, it's a nuclear missile." [Wired]

]]>
http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5406974&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Iran Tests Long Distance Missile Capable of Reaching Europe]]> You know it's going to be one of those Mondays when Iranian nutters claim that they successfully tested the Shahab-3—their first multi-stage missile, capable of reaching Europe. Even worse: The multi-stage opens the door for Inter-Continental Ballistic Missiles.

At least, that's what the theory is. Iran says that the missile can reach 2000km, which is enough to hit Israel, NATO-member Turkey, India, China, and some parts of Greece and the former Yugoslavia. According to Western military experts, however, the Shahab-3's range may be only 1300km. The same experts also say that there may be a 2500km range version, which could easily reach many countries in Europe.

The worrying part about all this is that the Iranians have now a working, solid-state, multi-stage missile. This means that even longer-range variants of the Shahab-3 are only a matter of time. Eventually, it will become a full Inter-Continental Ballistic Missiles capable of hitting anywhere in the world. [BBC News]

]]>
http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5369287&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[What Is This?]]> Is this a huge version of Darth Vader's lightsaber, as someone said in the comments? It actually does look like one.

Looking at the scale—compared to the tiny humans on the ground—and the strange external machinery attached to it, I thought this was part of some kind of huge experimental rocket. I was wrong, but kind of close.

It's the second interceptor silo for the Ground-based Midcourse Defense system. It's being installed now by Boeing and the U.S. Missile Defense Agency at the Vandenberg Air Force Base, in Santa Barbara County, California. You know, the missile defense system that is not going to save us from any nuclear mayhem, but maybe from some retards launching the occasional warhead. [Boeing]

]]>
http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5348927&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Just Where Can North Korea's Missiles Hit?]]> This Guardian report says that North Korea would hit the United States with a "fire shower" of nukes if we attack first. But how far can NK deliver the 5-7 nukes that they're currently suspected of having?

According to Wikipedia, it depends. If they're using the short to medium range missiles, it's probably going to be the Musudan, which has an operational range of 2500-4000 kilometers. The darker red circle shows the maximum range of this. Nowhere close to US territories, but China, Russia and Japan should probably keep an eye open.

However, if they're going to use their Taepodong-2 long range three-stage missiles, there's a MAXIMUM possibility of 10,000 kilometers (the larger circle). However, a more likely scenario is somewhere around 4500 kilometers, which still isn't quite far enough to hit Alaska or Hawaii.

In the case that somehow it can reach the maximum 10,000 kilometers, it's still not quite there to the west coast of the US, so I can take my diapers off and stop worrying. [Guardian]

Update: Ah crap. There's a reason why I don't do this for a living. The Earth is round. Here's a better map. We're all screwed. Thanks commenters. Forget everything I wrote.

The image associated with this post is best viewed using a browser.

]]>
http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5302604&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Pentagon's New "Suburb Warrior" UAVs Promise to Try to Kill Slightly Fewer Civilians]]> The image associated with this post is best viewed using a browser.The Pentagon's current crop of unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) are insanely powerful—the "Hellfire" is so named for a reason—but also fairly imprecise, often killing innocent, nearby civilians. The DoD's new UAVs hope to cut down on such casualties.

In a recent briefing, the Department of Defense laid out its new plans: Smaller and far more precise UAVs with badass names like "Suburb Warrior" and "Sniper" that will hunt in groups, rather than just blowing suspected hideouts to pieces with Hellfire missiles. The Suburb Warrior, for example, is designed to fire volleys of mini-missiles in tight formation, which makes a nice change from previous missiles that often demolished entire city blocks.

Unfortunately, these new UAVs should see production in about five years, by which time who knows what kind of battles we'll need to fight—or who'll be leading the Pentagon. But it's a step in the right direction, that's for sure. [Esquire]

]]>
http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5296179&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[North Korea Intercontinental Ballistic Missile Fails Miserably]]> According to the US Northern Command, the infamous North Korean launch of an Intercontinental Ballistic Missile—which went over Japan terrifying Brian Ashcraft—has been a complete failure, with its payload falling into the Pacific Ocean:

NORAD and USNORTHCOM monitor North Korean launch

April 05, 2009

PETERSON AIR FORCE BASE, Colo. - North American Aerospace Defense Command and U.S. Northern Command officials acknowledged today that North Korea launched a Taepo Dong 2 missile at 10:30 p.m. EDT Saturday which passed over the Sea of Japan/East Sea and the nation of Japan.

Stage one of the missile fell into the Sea of Japan/East Sea. The remaining stages along with the payload itself landed in the Pacific Ocean.

No object entered orbit and no debris fell on Japan.

NORAD and USNORTHCOM assessed the space launch vehicle as not a threat to North America or Hawaii and took no action in response to this launch.

This is all of the information that will be provided by NORAD and USNORTHCOM pertaining to the launch.

Apparently, their rocket technology is not really there yet, and the second stage never separated or ignited, according to Defense Tech's analysis. And that's yet another pathetic failure by the North Korean clowns, boys and girls. Maybe Kim Yong-il and the rest of his gang should develop pork buns for their starving population, rather ICBMs. [Northern Command via Defense Tech]

]]>
http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5199611&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Bollywood Missiles Ad Destroys My Ears, Eyes, Faith in Humanity]]> For some reason, Israeli missile maker Rafael thought that a Bollywood dance number will help missiles sales to India. I don't know if I should laugh hysterically or cry. I will do both.

According to the video description, "the Israeli arms firm Rafael displayed this Bollywood dance number-based marketing video at the recently held Aero India 2009 in Bangalore." Our friends at Flight Global say that the Israeli company thought it was a good way to "build familiarity between India and Israel and Rafael."

They can do whatever they want to sell their weapons to any morons who want to buy them, but please SOMEONE GET THAT MUSIC OFF MY HEAD NOW! [Flight Global]

]]>
http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5169452&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[New Boomerang Missile Can Destroy Enemy Fighters Behind Combat Jets]]> Score another one for Australians after inventing the didgeridoo and koala teddies: Their Air Force just got the first missile that can kill enemy fighters behind their F/A-18s, converting the hunter into (dead) prey.

Imagine this: You are Chinese MiG pilot chasing a Royal Australian Air Force F/A-18 fighter jet. All of the sudden, you see the flash of a fired missile under its wing, which leaves you scratching your head. After all, you are the one chasing the guy ahead and he doesn't have anything in front. So for a brief moment you wonder until you see the missile turning around towards you, which is probably the last thing you are going to see in your life, seconds before getting engulfed in flames. Good bye, sucker.

That's exactly what the Australians did the other day for the first time ever, without grilling a Chinese pilot: One of their new ASRAAM (Advanced Short-Range Air-to-Air Missile) was fired at a target behind the wing-line of one of their F/A-18 Hornets. The chasing plane was located at more than three miles behind the Hornet, resulting in a direct kill.

What does this mean? Basically, that you don't need to be Maverick to survive up there as long as you have a full load of these missiles. According to the company, the new ASRAAMs give full-around protection. But then again, all these fighters are going to be irrelevant soon. [Defense Tech]

]]>
http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5167748&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[23 Cold War-Era Playground Rockets]]> During the height of the cold war in the early 80's you could find me on the playground of my elementary school, climbing on a rocketship similar to the 23 captured by photographer Lauren Orchowski.

These images were taken at various locations across the United States over a three year period—and I suppose they make a statement about our mentality during that time. Although, cold war or not—playing on rocketship monkey bars is always awesome. Hit the artist's website for the full gallery. [Lauren Orchowski via Boing Boing Gadgets]

]]>
http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5167533&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Iran Puts Its First Satellite Into Orbit]]> On the 30th anniversary of Iran's Islamic Revolution, Mahmoud and friends have put their first functional satellite into orbit, carried there from a domestically-made Safir 2 rocket.


AP brings us Iran's state television footage:

Named Omid, or hope, the satellite weighs around 60 pounds and is primarily a "data-processing satellite" according to IRNA, the state news agency. Last summer, Iran said they successfully put a dummy satellite in space, but this appears to be the first time a working piece of hardware was put into orbit.

As we all know, space programs aren't all for planting flags in far-off rocks in the name of fellowship, exploration and the triumph of the human spirit—they're primarily for figuring out how to toss warheads at your far-flung enemies around the world. The differences between a rocket and an intercontinental ballistic missile are very few, and that's clearly one of the many messages Iran is hoping to send home with this launch.

The NYTimes is quoting David Washington, a proliferation expert at the Institute for Science and International Security, who says the Safir 2 rockets do not pose a serious threat:

“It’s not a very capable missile. The payload and diameter aren’t that great,” he said. “It doesn’t say much, if anything, about their ability to deliver a nuclear weapon. But part of the concern here is that Iran is continuing its steady drip-drip-drip toward a nuclear weapons capability.”

White house spokesman Robert Gibbs said the US will use "all elements of our national power" to deal with any potential threat posed by these new developments. [NYTimes, Breitbart]

]]>
http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5145798&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Boeing Airborne Laser Weapon Fires for the First Time]]> Boeing and the US Air Force keep advancing in their airborne high-energy laser weapon, the modified 747-400F that is designed to shoot down missiles as they fly to their targets. Last week they fired the entire laser system for the first time ever at the Edwards Air Force Base in California.

While the laser has been tested before, this was the first time they actually operated the whole thing as if they were shooting down a real target. This test fired the laser from the back-mounted generator thought the beam control system, exiting the aircraft through the nose-mounted turret and hitting a simulated ballistic missile target.

The next test—to be executed next year—will be firing and shooting down a real airborne ballistic missile.

Boeing Airborne Laser Team Fires High-Energy Laser Through Beam Control System

EDWARDS AIR FORCE BASE, Calif., Dec. 01, 2008 — The Boeing Company [NYSE: BA], industry teammates and the U.S. Missile Defense Agency last week fired a high-energy laser through the Airborne Laser's (ABL) beam control/fire control system, completing the first ground test of the entire weapon system integrated aboard the aircraft.

During the test at Edwards Air Force Base, the laser beam traveled through the beam control/fire control system before exiting the aircraft through the nose-mounted turret. The beam control/fire control system steered and focused the beam onto a simulated ballistic-missile target.

"This test is significant because it demonstrated that the Airborne Laser missile defense program has successfully integrated the entire weapon system aboard the ABL aircraft," said Scott Fancher, vice president and general manager of Boeing Missile Defense Systems. "With the achievement of the first firing of the laser aboard the aircraft in September, the team has now completed the two major milestones it hoped to accomplish in 2008, keeping ABL on track to conduct the missile shootdown demonstration planned for next year."

Michael Rinn, Boeing vice president and ABL program director, said the next step for the program is a series of longer-duration laser firings through the beam control/fire control system.

"Once we complete those tests, we will begin demonstrating the entire weapon system in flight," Rinn said. "The team is meeting its commitment to deliver this transformational directed-energy weapon system in the near term."

The program has logged many accomplishments over the past several years. In 2005, the high-energy laser demonstrated lethal levels of duration and power in the System Integration Laboratory at Edwards. In 2007, ABL completed numerous flight tests that demonstrated its ability to track an airborne target, measure and compensate for atmospheric conditions, and deliver a surrogate high-energy laser's simulated lethal beam on the target. In September 2008, the team achieved "first light" by firing the high-energy laser into a calorimeter aboard the aircraft.

Boeing is the prime contractor for ABL, which will provide speed-of-light capability to destroy all classes of ballistic missiles in their boost phase of flight.

The ABL aircraft is a modified Boeing 747-400F whose back half holds the high-energy laser, designed and built by Northrop Grumman. The front section of the aircraft contains the beam control/fire control system, developed by Lockheed Martin, and the battle management system, provided by Boeing.

]]>
http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5100377&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[France Gets New Intercontinental Ballistic Missile, World Exclaims "Merde!"]]> What you see here is the new M51 nuclear ballistic missile literally getting out of the swimming pool. For some reason, the French military—like everyone else, really—thinks that it is a good idea to spend five billion dollars developing new and more effective methods to destroy the planet as the world itself keeps going to hell on its own. Because what humanity needs right now is a Mer-Sol-Balistique-Stratégique missile, oh le missile, loaded with six independently targetable TN 75 thermonuclear warheads with "penetration aids" (yes, they are French. Pervs).

The three-stage solid propellant engine of the M51 is derived from the Ariane 5 rocket, weights 57 tons and has a range of 4,970 miles, guided by inertial and star position systems. It would be delivered in 2010 to their Triomphant class submarines and, hopefully, they will get rusty in there. Or maybe not.

]]>
http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5097546&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[BALLS 17 Experimental Rocket Competition, In Photographs]]> "BALLS 17 is a venue for projects that should NOT be flown publicly due to safety and legal restrictions. This may include, but is not limited to, LARGE rockets, complex staging or clustering, metal rockets, self designed and/or fabricated rocket motors and new technologies being developed or proven."

That's the disclaimer on the BALLS Experimental Rocket Launch website. Their 17th annual meeting just concluded in Nevada's Black Rock Desert where at least one rocket cracked 70,000 feet. Many others had successful flights. And some just blew up. Photography by Erik Charlton. See more of his fantastic shots from the event here. [via MAKE]

]]>
http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5059436&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Iran Hopes to Send a Man to Space Within 10 Years]]> After a test satellite launch (Iran: success! USA: failure!) this past weekend carried out with one of their many, many missiles, Iran is rolling with the momentum and announcing plans to put a man in space within 10 years. While the feasibility of such a plan remains up in the air, it of course isn't the first time such an audacious goal has been set.

At this point it's little more than wishful saber rattling, of course, but if there's one way to prove your mettle as a nation, it's to blast something big into space. But it would take a fool to think that space program could somehow help develop long-range ICBM systems, I mean, come on guys. Our space race with the Soviets was totally about the science. Right? [Reuters, Image: Giz's Iran Photoshop Contest Winner]

]]>
http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5039894&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Iran State Media Used Photoshop to Make Missile Tests Look More Impressive]]> Gizmodo readers aren't the only people who love digitally altering photos using Photoshop — so does Iranian state media! You may have seen the above photo yesterday, which features four scary missiles being fired off as a test/example of the size of Iran's dick. Guess what? One of those missiles is a fake. Here's what the original photo looks like:

Nice work with the Photoshopping, Iran. You guys should enter one of our contests sometime. [NY Times]

]]>
http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5023775&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Video Shows Iran Will Destroy Infidels Two Hours Late]]> Hey Mr. Pentagon Guys, John Mayer here. Remember those plans to invade Iran because of their missiles and weapons of mass destruction and the long fugly beards and a musical taste that doesn't include me? Yeah? Well, just take your time. Watch the video. All will be clearer afterwards. Thanks yous, John.

]]>
http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5020550&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Inside Video of Operation "Blow Up a Satellite": Heart Pounding Action...With Missiles!]]> Remember how the Navy fired a missile at that spy satellite a few months ago and made it go boom in one shot? Not surprisingly, they were quite proud of their accomplishment—which is why they have compiled footage of their exploits in a series of tense behind-the-scenes moments. The video after the break even shows the missile leaving the ship on its way to a victorious rendezvous with the pesky satellite. It is a definite must-see for any fan of explosions and the work that goes into making those explosions happen.


[Wired]

]]>
http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=392554&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[The Military's Satellite-Exploding Fireworks Show is Imminent, Expensive]]> Remember how I told you that the Pentagon had plans to blow up an errant spy satellite with a missile? Well, it's happening, and it might just be happening tonight if the weather clears up. Blowin' stuff up, hot diggity damn! The downside? This operation in glorified fireworks is gonna cost taxpayers somewhere in the neighborhood of $50 million. That makes it less fun sounding, doesn't it?

Yes, with each missile costing around $10 million and two or three shots possibly necessary, this isn't a cheap process. So why is the Pentagon dropping this much money on something that, in all likelihood, would mostly burn up on reentry and land in the middle of the ocean?

Well, for one, this thing has 1,000 pounds of Hydrazine rocket fuel on board, which isn't anything you'd want landing in your front yard. According to the EPA, "exposure to high levels of hydrazine may [induce] irritation of the eyes, nose, and throat, dizziness, headache, nausea, pulmonary edema, seizures, and coma in humans." Hilariously enough, Hydrazine is also found in second-hand cigarette smoke, just not quite as much as would explode in your face if you were in the wrong place at the wrong time when this satellite fell.

But wouldn't all that rocket fuel burn up on reentry? You'd think it'd be the first to go, right? I mean, I'm certainly no rocket scientist, but that makes sense to me. So what other reasons could there be for spending so much coin on this operation?

Well, this is actually a pretty sweet opportunity for the military to test out its sea-based strategic missile defense system. Popular Science does a great job breaking down exactly what this test is going to entail. So essentially, this whole thing is either a way to save our environment from 1,000 pounds of toxic rocket fuel or an excuse to test out the militaries blowing-stuff-up program.

In any case, there will be explosions, and we will find video of said explosions right when it happens. Our priorities are straight. Stay tuned.

]]>
http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=358787&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[SkyGuard Annihilates Incoming Missiles with Giant Laser]]> It sounds like something straight out of a video game, but the U.S. Dept of Homeland Security is considering using Northrop Grumman's SkyGuard to take out incoming rockets before they reach their intended targets. Each SkyGuard costs $150 million to make and is armed with an infrared camera that scans the sky looking for suspicious objects. When something is spotted, its onboard computer checks to see what it is and if it's a rocket/missile, it'll shoot out a laser beam and zap it before it hits land. I can see the military using this on runways to ensure planes land and take off safely, but I don't know if I'd necessarily trust the computer to always be right. Check out the video after the jump.


Missile-Proofing Runways [via PopSci]

]]>
http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=220530&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Striker II: USB Laser Guided Missile Launcher]]> We've preached the merits of USB missile launchers before, which is why this new product is such important news. The $50 Striker II is the "next generation" USB missile launcher, featuring a class 3 "laser guidance system" for better aiming.

You control the launcher through fully mod-ready PC software. But why no Mac support? We're not all pacifist, granola-eating, black mock turtle-wearing hippies. Oh wait.
Thanks GP!

Product Page [ninjagizmos]

]]>
http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=217162&view=rss&microfeed=true