Either this, or a good netbook with VLC installed. I realize that these are two completely different products, but a netbook is small enough, and capable enough, to do what this does and be a little more flexible in the codec department.
Do you suppose that the giant "SD I USB" header might be a sign that the device is really designed for geeks? And if the geeks here are scratching our heads on whether we would ever buy such a thing, what does that say about the possible sales numbers? Still, it is black and it is pretty - so there will be a couple of people that will surely buy it.
Have you ever tried to watch a movie on your ipod? Its extremely small and if the movie is wide screen (like everything is now) it makes it even smaller. And yes, I am talking about the ipod classic. I haven't seen videos on the touch yet. But even still....a 9" screen is a lot better to watch things on then a 3" screen
@Framewerk: Videos on the touch is very nice. The display is not very large, but it's big enough to hold just within arm's length and view comfortably. I used to watch videos a lot on the iPod video, but after using the touch, I can't go back. Of course, if I have an outlet, the Macbook beats all :)
This is a nifty device though. iLuv actually makes some pretty good equipment for iPods.
"(All of the MPEG codecs we talk about, btw, will have an associated layer, since the video section is only part of the full standard, which includes audio and other stuff. MPEG-1 Layer 3, you probably know, is MP3.) "
You've got the wrong terminology there buddy. Part 2 of the MPEG-1 specification is indeed for video and part 3 is for audio, but part 3 and layer 3 are not the same. The MPEG-1 Part 3 audio specification includes three layers of audio formats, layers 1, 2 and 3 â each one building upon the other. Thus, layer 3 includes all the elements of layers 1 and 2 plus some new stuff. This is actually a bit inefficient because of the layering, but it was ultimately decided to implement the specification in this manner to allow for the greatest compatibility. The OGG audio codec is actually very similar to MP3, just without the layer 1 and 2 compatibility â hence it is marginally better than MP3.
All the Blu-ray AVC, VC-1, and MPEG-2 codecs are wrapped inside MPEG-2 transport stream containers (.m2ts). The HDDVD VC-1 and AVC codes were wrapped inside .EVO containers.
Can we please stop using the mkv container? It's the most resource hungry format I've ever encountered. Thus, it ends up taking ~100min to convert an hour of HD video to play on the Apple TV. And Boxes can't even handle mkv files.
@teexcue: MKV has nothing to do with your encoding/transcoding times. It's just a wrapper, or container. What governs your computational time is what's inside that wrapper. Admittedly, most MKV files on the web contain heavily compressed H264 video streams, which are very resource-intensive. But, that's not MKV's fault. If the MKV file were to contain an equivalently long and resolutioned MPEG-2 stream, it would be much faster to convert.
02/26/09
02/26/09
02/26/09
02/26/09
02/26/09
02/26/09
02/26/09
Have you ever tried to watch a movie on your ipod? Its extremely small and if the movie is wide screen (like everything is now) it makes it even smaller. And yes, I am talking about the ipod classic. I haven't seen videos on the touch yet. But even still....a 9" screen is a lot better to watch things on then a 3" screen
02/26/09
This is a nifty device though. iLuv actually makes some pretty good equipment for iPods.
02/26/09
That is just a crime against naming things!
11/20/08
You've got the wrong terminology there buddy. Part 2 of the MPEG-1 specification is indeed for video and part 3 is for audio, but part 3 and layer 3 are not the same. The MPEG-1 Part 3 audio specification includes three layers of audio formats, layers 1, 2 and 3 â each one building upon the other. Thus, layer 3 includes all the elements of layers 1 and 2 plus some new stuff. This is actually a bit inefficient because of the layering, but it was ultimately decided to implement the specification in this manner to allow for the greatest compatibility. The OGG audio codec is actually very similar to MP3, just without the layer 1 and 2 compatibility â hence it is marginally better than MP3.
11/20/08
11/20/08
11/20/08
11/20/08
11/20/08
11/20/08
Pretty Cool
Poetically Curvacious
Perfectly Capable
Perversely Corrupt
Pleasant Company
I could go on but I'm sure you've heard, or read enough already.... ;)
11/20/08
11/20/08
11/20/08
11/20/08
11/20/08
11/20/08
MKV has nothing to do with your encoding/transcoding times. It's just a wrapper, or container. What governs your computational time is what's inside that wrapper. Admittedly, most MKV files on the web contain heavily compressed H264 video streams, which are very resource-intensive. But, that's not MKV's fault. If the MKV file were to contain an equivalently long and resolutioned MPEG-2 stream, it would be much faster to convert.
11/20/08
11/20/08
11/20/08
11/20/08
Also, they are usually at a better quality than those shabby .avi's (of course, all my .mkv's usually say 720p so that's probably why xD)
Oh, also. VLC laughs at those codecs! In a smug, french way. No-ho-ho-ho!
11/20/08