This is stupid. I take one earplug out all the time, especially at work. What, did they run out of improvements to make in sound quality and durability?
@MisterWho *Star: What I was going to say. I listen to stuff all the time at work with one earbud in - so I can hear if someone is coming! These headphones would basically break that ability.
While I find it a bit silly that you have to pull out your headphones to answer the phone, I mean, pushing a button would surely be more convenient, but otherwise the whole concept seems pretty user friendly, intuitive, and practical.
.
"World Changing" probably wouldn't be how I'd describe it though...
@TheLostVikings R.O.A.C.H.: Hmm, just re-watched the video, and if you have to use both hands to answer the phone rather than just pulling out one of the earplugs on the fly, then that is fucking horrible.
Would make it kinda hard to answer the phone while riding my bike...
@nikkitoria: Resistive touch screen uses multiple layers of thin material. As the pressure applied compresses the layers they register the central point of incresed resistance (voltage differential) and the software determines the X/Y coordinates. Pros include lower cost and generally higher durability, cons include potentially less visibility (as more light has to pass through more layers of material), and somewhat lower accuracy.
Capacitative touch screen uses a single layer of material that conducts an electrical field across the screen. They require almost no contact as they don't register to pressure, but instead react to capacitance interference from your fingertip (hence they don't work as well, or at all, with a stylus, or while wearing gloves). However, they register multitouch if the controller supports it. They permit more visible light through the surface, and have extremely accurate X/Y positioning, but are generally more expensive to manufacture and require a somewhat more advanced controller to interpret the touch data.
@the_guy_elsewise_known_as_beeb...: Right, looks like two beamed quarter notes, which, as I recall, Apple didn't invent (unless they have a patent filing somewhere that's over 250 years old).
@Jim Halpert: A grid of icons with text underneath is copying the iPhone interface? I had many phones before the iPhone was released that had similar interfaces.
Apple didn't invent the icon or the rectangular array.
@Jim Halpert: Here is a screenshot of a Nokia N95 with icons.
As you can see, quite similar, yet it predates the iPhone by over a year (which would imply it was in development more than a year before the first iPhone was ever glimpsed by a fanboy). The OS, Symbian, was around even before that.
So, you see, not everything is about Apple. Prettily arrayed icons on a black background isn't Apple's baby, much as you'd like to think so. As far as phone formfactor, well, adult human hands are all pretty much the same, so any rectangular phone made in black...
@Jim Halpert: Well then, what exactly is your point? The Samsung menu and the Nokia N95 menu are virtually identical. In fact, neither even uses the iPhone icon style, which is to say, the rounded corner "full block" glass-style icons.
I honestly think you're simply being a fanboy troll. Not only have you done nothing but whine snarkily, you've also done nothing to serve your point, as others besides myself, have pointed out. Get over your iPhone fetish, already. There is no denying that the iPhone formfactor is stylish (at least to many), but claiming that Apple originated the look of icons laid out in a grid style is ludicrous and simply entrenches the already well-established idiocy of the Apple fanboy base.
And for the record, embe dyour images with standard HTML tags, but don't close the tag with the trailing
09/22/09
09/21/09
09/21/09
09/21/09
.
"World Changing" probably wouldn't be how I'd describe it though...
09/21/09
Would make it kinda hard to answer the phone while riding my bike...
02/07/09
02/09/09
Capacitative touch screen uses a single layer of material that conducts an electrical field across the screen. They require almost no contact as they don't register to pressure, but instead react to capacitance interference from your fingertip (hence they don't work as well, or at all, with a stylus, or while wearing gloves). However, they register multitouch if the controller supports it. They permit more visible light through the surface, and have extremely accurate X/Y positioning, but are generally more expensive to manufacture and require a somewhat more advanced controller to interpret the touch data.
02/07/09
02/09/09
Next?
02/07/09
I know its the most popular phone on the market, but seriously, think for yourself for once.
02/07/09
02/07/09
Apple didn't invent the icon or the rectangular array.
02/07/09
Oh come on.
Dont even try and say that isnt the iphone interface.
02/08/09
As you can see, quite similar, yet it predates the iPhone by over a year (which would imply it was in development more than a year before the first iPhone was ever glimpsed by a fanboy). The OS, Symbian, was around even before that.
So, you see, not everything is about Apple. Prettily arrayed icons on a black background isn't Apple's baby, much as you'd like to think so. As far as phone formfactor, well, adult human hands are all pretty much the same, so any rectangular phone made in black...
02/08/09
Actually that is way diffferent than the iphone's.
Gotta pay attention to detail dude.
[IMG][i392.photobucket.com]]
02/08/09
I honestly think you're simply being a fanboy troll. Not only have you done nothing but whine snarkily, you've also done nothing to serve your point, as others besides myself, have pointed out. Get over your iPhone fetish, already. There is no denying that the iPhone formfactor is stylish (at least to many), but claiming that Apple originated the look of icons laid out in a grid style is ludicrous and simply entrenches the already well-established idiocy of the Apple fanboy base.
And for the record, embe dyour images with standard HTML tags, but don't close the tag with the trailing
02/07/09