If I had a Nano, this would almost be a no-brainer of a buy. I've used the external speakers on my VZW Env to play background music for work events. Little speakers like this sound good enough for settings where music isn't the primary draw, but can still be enjoyed. #ipodspeakers
Perhaps to state the obvious, but...the portable speakers are great on vacation.
Before we traveled throughout SE Asia, we bought a set of tiny portable speakers, and they were a life saver. Would have never used them at home (and haven't) but it was really nice to set them up at night on or porch and listen to music while drinking lao lao and looking out over the river.
Headphones wouldn't have worked quite the same way.
Something like this would have been even more convenient. #ipodspeakers
@92BuickLeSabre: We were right next door, disliked your taste in music and would have devoutly preferred for you wear headphones, vs. impose "your music" on us when we were trying to chill in our own quiet fashion.
No you were right on target. "Headphones wouldn't have worked quite the same way."
Thanks for ruining our evenings.
Plus you never offered to share that delicious lao-lao. Even a bong hit would have been nice. #ipodspeakers
@njdevil: You can select "Show Hidden Threads" at the bottom of the page. You can also go to the "Settings" section of your profile and set it to always show the hidden threads.
And no... I'm not the least bit hurt by your opinion of star comments... #ipodspeakers
@Software_Goddess: I set it to always show hidden threads yesterday,but I haven't noticed any changes. Still hidden
It's not that I have something against starred commenters, I just don't personally value their input any more than any other random person on the internet.
Take this article for example. The few hidden threads there are are both funnier and more informative than anything posted by you starred commenters- See comments by @whatne1wuddo and @Shawn Pero. #ipodspeakers
Then again, anyone who sees your user name would quickly realize that you are a great deceiver and false teacher, attempting to tempt and trick all of us from the beginning of recorded history. In short, you appear to be from New Jersey. #ipodspeakers
@TheLostVikings R.O.A.C.H.: At first the setting would flip back after a few hours, but now it stays on "show hidden threads", but still hides hidden threads.
Similar problem with my avatar thingy- I changed it a few weeks ago from what I now know is a pedobear to an instructables hand. When I post something, it will show the new avatar, but the next time I view the page, it shows pedobear. How do I fix that? #ipodspeakers
But what if I want to play the terminator theme while using cyborg mode on that awesome new camera? How do they expect me to do that if they cover it up with the speaker? Screw this then. #ipodspeakers
Edited by Mike Zuniga: That was Unexpected at 10/16/09 6:29 PM
Mike Zuniga: That was Unexpected was starred
Mike Zuniga: That was Unexpected was unstarred
of all the possible deviant acts, i find this to be one of, if not THE most harmless. not my cup of tea but hats off to all the upskirters out there who had a dream and went for the gold.
Infrared doesn't really work as x-ray vision anyway... it just makes some coloured fabrics look as if they were white, so if they're thin and colored, you may notice they're a bit transparent if there's no colour to them.
(There are a lot of legitimate things to shoot in IR, like money, pop, trees. Lots of things look weird or surprising!)
Not that I am for this, but why technically is it illegal? It's not like he set it up in a changing room or rest room where privacy is expected. And one gust of wind could have given many others the same view of what he was catching on his ipod. Again, not that I am for this, just wondering what law is being broken.
@mdoublej: I'd like to point out that if a person gets arrested for doing something, it's pretty logical to assume that that something is illegal in that country.
@mdoublej: It would be a class G felony in the State of Delaware (okay, it's the only state I actually know the answer in, so hey, I at least know it for one state). It's the violation of privacy statute, 11 Del. C. § 1335(a)(7), which reads:
(a) A person is guilty of violation of privacy when, except as authorized by law, the person:
(7) Secretly or surreptitiously videotapes, films, photographs or otherwise records another person under or through that person's clothing for the purpose of viewing the body of or the undergarments worn by that other person;
Punishable by up to 2 years imprisonment. So, if nothing else, don't do this in Delaware.
@Cogito Ergo Bibo: Gotcha, so it is a specific law on the books. Didn't want to end up sounding like a perv, but since I know there isn't an expectation of privacy in public, and he never touched the women, I wondered what they charged the guy with.
@mdoublej: Actually, I'm with Gene on this one. There IS a reasonable expectation of privacy for women's undies in public. We wake up in the morning, put a skirt over them and do not presume that they will be visible. Unless something entirely unexpected or intentional on someone's part occurs, undies are not visible. To presume no reasonable expectation of privacy is to presume that every woman has consented to having some perv memorialize a shot of her silky underthings capable of redistribution (or at least capable of being shown to a buddy via the phone itself and certainly capable of being viewed over and over in the privacy of said perv's own home while doing what we all know he's doing).
Can't speak for the rest of the ladies, but I never signed off on that.
I for one do not understand why someone in Japan hasn't released a laser panty, a la rich man's boat, so that it will blast any camera trying to get a peek at the kitties.
@Azst~Aznslackertype: That type of approach makes it seem like upskirting is the fault of women... I've heard the same said by very orthodox muslim men about... well, all types of clothing that isn't a full-on veil. I think it's best to say "hey, let's ban cameras before we ban types of clothing", hehe.
@OCEntertainment: Hey I have no problem with most types of garment. In the end, it makes no difference when it's unzipped/buckled/buttoned. I still stand behind my kick-perv-in-the-crotch idea. Kicking people in the crotch for doing pervy things is a wholly righteous thing to do, and their facial expressions and writhing is an added bonus.
11/03/09
11/03/09
11/03/09
11/03/09
11/03/09
10/16/09
10/16/09
Before we traveled throughout SE Asia, we bought a set of tiny portable speakers, and they were a life saver. Would have never used them at home (and haven't) but it was really nice to set them up at night on or porch and listen to music while drinking lao lao and looking out over the river.
Headphones wouldn't have worked quite the same way.
Something like this would have been even more convenient. #ipodspeakers
10/16/09
No you were right on target. "Headphones wouldn't have worked quite the same way."
Thanks for ruining our evenings.
Plus you never offered to share that delicious lao-lao. Even a bong hit would have been nice. #ipodspeakers
10/16/09
Also? Impeccable taste in music.
Plus, I totally would have shared the lao lao. #ipodspeakers
10/16/09
10/16/09
And no... I'm not the least bit hurt by your opinion of star comments... #ipodspeakers
10/16/09
It's not that I have something against starred commenters, I just don't personally value their input any more than any other random person on the internet.
Take this article for example. The few hidden threads there are are both funnier and more informative than anything posted by you starred commenters- See comments by @whatne1wuddo and @Shawn Pero. #ipodspeakers
10/16/09
Then again, anyone who sees your user name would quickly realize that you are a great deceiver and false teacher, attempting to tempt and trick all of us from the beginning of recorded history. In short, you appear to be from New Jersey. #ipodspeakers
10/17/09
10/17/09
10/17/09
Similar problem with my avatar thingy- I changed it a few weeks ago from what I now know is a pedobear to an instructables hand. When I post something, it will show the new avatar, but the next time I view the page, it shows pedobear. How do I fix that? #ipodspeakers
10/17/09
@Jrsy Devil's Bright Idea®: I know. Oh do I know. *raises eyebrow* #ipodspeakers
10/16/09
10/16/09
10/16/09
10/16/09
09/29/09
09/29/09
(There are a lot of legitimate things to shoot in IR, like money, pop, trees. Lots of things look weird or surprising!)
09/29/09
09/29/09
09/29/09
(a) A person is guilty of violation of privacy when, except as authorized by law, the person:
(7) Secretly or surreptitiously videotapes, films, photographs or otherwise records another person under or through that person's clothing for the purpose of viewing the body of or the undergarments worn by that other person;
Punishable by up to 2 years imprisonment. So, if nothing else, don't do this in Delaware.
09/29/09
09/29/09
Can't speak for the rest of the ladies, but I never signed off on that.
09/29/09
09/29/09
09/29/09
09/29/09
09/29/09
09/29/09
09/29/09
09/29/09
09/29/09
09/29/09
09/29/09
09/29/09
Girls are supposed to wear skirts, and guys are supposed to keep their perversions secret until public scandal breaks.
09/29/09
09/29/09
09/29/09
09/29/09
09/29/09
09/29/09
AHA!
Then, Pervs should be punished and forced to up-skirt video tape 24 Bag Pipers in full outfit for 24 hrs.
If the Pipes don't drive them insane, the video sure will!
09/29/09
09/29/09
09/29/09
09/29/09
09/29/09
Rest assured, though....they're probably on Jesus Diaz' hard drive by now.