I'm sure LIFE would like you to believe that these pics are exclusive to them, but it's just not so. NASA's images are free for everyone (your tax dollars at work).
Head for the enthusiast-run link site www.apolloarchive.com. Click 'Apollo Image Gallery'.
For new, huge hi-res scans from the original 2 inch negatives (!), click
'Full Hasselblad Magazines '.
To get the image from this post, click Apollo 17: 134/B (Color) EVA-1 & 3. Scroll down.
This shot is AS17-134-20453. Click the image number for a preview. Push the 'Hires' button and it's yours. See you in a few hours, pictures at this detail level are addicting. :-)
@Coolmodo: Unfortunately I believe the only way to do that is to purchase them from the link on the source page. I'm sure you can find some really high res shots if you just type in lunar rover on google images or something though.
Coolmodo promoted this comment
Edited by PurpleMonkeyDishwasher: at 11/02/09 12:31 PM
PurpleMonkeyDishwasher: was starred
PurpleMonkeyDishwasher: was unstarred
@Coolmodo: I would just use google images and set it to find 'larger than 50MP' even when searching for the image 'clowns' you get a great space pic. #space
@Coolmodo: any flight pictures (like the astronaut on the rover) are not LIFE pictures but are NASA shots and are thus in the public domain. Go to NASA.gov and search their extensive image archives. For a lot of the really good ones you can get print resolutions, much less wallpaper level images. #space
@Coolmodo: We taxpayers own all of these images, we already paid billions for them. You can download most if not all of them for free in very hi-res from the NASA website.
There he goes again. Jesus selling out to the man/Big NASA and perpetuating the myth. Everyone knows the moon does not exist! [www.revisionism.nl]#space
@GitEmSteveDave_SavingsTime: lol I've always wondered what the ocean would do without the moon... would there be waves? would we all drown? very puzzling... #space
@opanitch: Waves are caused by the wind, tides are caused by the moon (and partly by the sun). Ignoring all the other things that would go wrong if we didn't have a moon, there just wouldn't be any tides and water levels would just remain at the middle point between high and low tides.
Curves promoted this comment
Edited by PurpleMonkeyDishwasher: at 11/02/09 12:37 PM
PurpleMonkeyDishwasher: was starred
PurpleMonkeyDishwasher: was unstarred
The rovers have performed magnificently. Imagine what an updated version could accomplish if it was controlled directly from a long-term base on the planet. #mars
@CoHPhasor: Oh, man, did you ever get that right! I bet you could graph disasters versus percentage of farmed-out fabrication and get a very pretty line. #mars
"we must remind ourselves these rovers were built for 90-day missions. Spirit is currently going on five years, nine months. "
maybe that means Mars is not quite as inhospitable as we thought. Maybe, just maybe, we should be a little more optimistic with regard to our ability to survive. #mars
You know, when I'm old and feeble, I will probably take a day trip from the senior center to see these bad boys at the Smithsonian. Because I hope they get picked up and brought back home. They deserve a return trip. #mars
At this point, who cares? Mission accomplished. We flew robots to mars, had all of them land and function correctly, and had them function of years when they were supposed to only last for 90 days. And to add to it all NASA was one of the few federal agencies that got its budget severely slashed during the last president's term.
Its really a shame that the common tax payer won't give a shit until China, Japan, or India, Russia or the EU try to do something cool. Watch when Japan gets that space based solar power system into orbit. Suddenly we'll be neck deep in space race syndrome. #mars
@ddhboy: It is unfortunate that the common tax payer doesn't give two shits unless a NASA mission involves explosions (not counting the big continuous one at the beginning of each one) or human landings... #mars
11/06/09
11/05/09
11/04/09
11/02/09
[www.apolloarchive.com] #space
11/02/09
Head for the enthusiast-run link site www.apolloarchive.com. Click 'Apollo Image Gallery'.
For new, huge hi-res scans from the original 2 inch negatives (!), click
'Full Hasselblad Magazines '.
To get the image from this post, click Apollo 17: 134/B (Color) EVA-1 & 3. Scroll down.
This shot is AS17-134-20453. Click the image number for a preview. Push the 'Hires' button and it's yours. See you in a few hours, pictures at this detail level are addicting. :-)
11/02/09
11/02/09
11/02/09
11/02/09
11/02/09
11/02/09
[www.nasa.gov] #space
11/02/09
Click "Full Hasselblad Magazines" if you want the really good shots. #space
11/03/09
11/02/09
11/02/09
11/02/09
11/02/09
EDIT: Also came across this [curious.astro.cornell.edu]
11/02/09
11/02/09
11/02/09
[www.rainydaymagazine.com]
11/01/09
11/01/09
11/01/09
The Rovers are proof positive that NASA should keep their tech builds in-house! #mars
11/01/09
11/01/09
11/01/09
maybe that means Mars is not quite as inhospitable as we thought. Maybe, just maybe, we should be a little more optimistic with regard to our ability to survive. #mars
11/01/09
Flash memory is not a magnetic storage medium and thus magnets do nothing to the contents stored in it.
A martian with a EMI gun on the other hand... #mars
11/02/09
11/01/09
11/01/09
Its really a shame that the common tax payer won't give a shit until China, Japan, or India, Russia or the EU try to do something cool. Watch when Japan gets that space based solar power system into orbit. Suddenly we'll be neck deep in space race syndrome. #mars
11/01/09