@Bandit: That response was also tongue-in-cheek. But so tongue in cheek that it BLEW YOUR MIND. You just can't see it now because your MIND IS SO BLOWN.
I was sort of hoping they'd go back to Kenny the Weather Kia, where he proceeds to peck the eyes out of his handler in some comedic fashion. I guess that's what I get for hoping for too much.
There's a key piece of information missing, how long have they been in place? Anyone can say there hasn't been a single accident since they are in place if it's only been a day.
The billboard may be terrifying but Paparuka District Council claims that since they went up over Easter - traditionally the worst time for fatalities because of the holiday rush and first heavy rains after summer - nobody has died.
I now believe the writers of this site are spoilt fucks.
Where you cunts make your money at so 3 grand isnt much I don't know, since you're blogging in your underpants instead of getting a real job. Probably mooching off your parents.
@Indigen: Yeah, try canning some of that vitriol, you malcontent. $3,000+ for an engagement ring is common, and while I could find lots of rings at half or less than that price, there's a great deal that cost more than twice than the price in the article. I guess you don't know much at all about the jewelry market, or else you wouldn't be so eager to spout off this nonsense in this comment.
$3,000 for a one-time/rare occasion is not that much at all if you have the income. If you make as much as the guy in the article, losing out on $3,000 would suck, but it wouldn't make him pinch pennies the next time he went to the grocery store either.
Thanks for posting that video Jesus; I don't know how I hadn't seen that one, but it's definitely one of their better songs.
I hope this little contest gets this guy some attention and he finds his next true love. And I hope, for the sake of the contest winner, that he hasn't hidden it up a sheep's bum just out of spite.
Most jewelry stores will take back rings in cases like this. Cash it in and have a good vacation, meet a new girl and dont buy the ring until you are pretty sure she will say yes.
@Curves: if you read the article, it says that he bought the ring overseas and therefore couldn't return it, and apparently he's so wealthy that he didn't need to sell it either. Who can fault him - he's just having a little fun with a bad situation, and if it makes him feel better that's worth $3000, right?
@weatherman: Call center jobs don't exactly make you a zillionaire... well, outside of Zaire and its many royal exiles wishing to give you many monies in exchange for use of your piddly checking account. Perhaps he's independently wealthy, or perhaps he thinks this would be a better investment of the $3,268.00.
Personally, I'd sell the damn thing and spend the proceeds on a wild night of hookers and blow.
@aec007: Congrats to you and Mrs 007, she is a lucky woman. I agree about the paper clip, you can have more emotional investment in that paperclip than all the diamonds in Africa.
While they are not as good as the paper clip, diamonds are still pretty nice. We ladies love shiny objects; they temporarily blind us with sparkle, so you guys have a chance to sneak up on us when we are distracted. I am pretty sure thats how its been done since the first caveman distracted the first cavewoman with a pretty rock, so he could drag her back to his cave by her hair, and DeBeers was formed.
@Sticks Calhoun: its not much considering you should budget 3 months gross salary for an engagement ring. $1090 a month is a tough situation to get married in.
@Sticks Calhoun: It's not considered that much because there's a plethora of engagement rings that weigh in at or above the $10k mark. I knew this girl who was getting engaged, and she wasn't satisfied with her ring, which was over $15k. At that moment, I was soured completely to the entire concept, though I'd like to think that I wouldn't even consider the thought of wedding someone so damn superficial.
@kurupt: Why "should" one budget that much? Who is setting these rules up? Is it the consortium who controls the majority of the world's diamond market? The ones who only release diamonds in low volume so as to not water down their own market? Who can't incorporate in the USA because we view them (friggin' rightfully, IMO) as a monopoly and wont' let them?
I think that it is...
Here's what you "should" do (at least according to me-please note that I am not a consortium trying to control the world's market of anything...barring, of course, magnetite, but that's for the death ray and not strictly for capitalist gain)-
You "should" find someone who's going to be happy with what you want to give her...and if that absolutely must be a ring, then you "should" find a ring that you're comfortable giving her-there are no standards to be met other than the ones you set-don't worry about making the diamond growers of the world happy, worry about your future wife (or husband, whichever, but I think that the rings are a little different).
@Jason: I think you mean they're not rare. Like d★nger the pirate said, they still have value, it's just based on a few people controlling the supply. You could also say "hundred dollar bills are not valuable" because really, it's just paper, but we all know that's not true.
@Jason: You want rare? I was watching a show on meteorite hunters last night, and a jewel made from a crystal in a metorite is worth something like 10,000 a carat.
@CaptMonkey: Diamonds are only valuable once. Then after you've been suckered into buying them, you have a bunch of shiny rocks that you could, in theory, pawn for a tenth of their retail price.
Diamonds have value because De Beers has tricked us into believing they have value. The 1947 marketing blitz, "A Diamond is Forever", is designed to keep us sheep from flooding the market with millions of secondhand diamonds, propping up their inflated markups.
07/06/09
If y͟ou͠ ̷d̡o̧n'͜t̵ dr̡i͜n͘k ͢- ͘h̀e͞y,́ ̡whàt's͢ ͟wi͟th t̵ha҉t bi͠ll̵bo̕a҉r͞d? ̨*̀ÇR̶ASH*
HE COMES
07/06/09
07/06/09
07/06/09
07/06/09
07/06/09
07/06/09
07/06/09
07/06/09
07/06/09
07/06/09
07/06/09
07/06/09
07/06/09
06/04/09
Where you cunts make your money at so 3 grand isnt much I don't know, since you're blogging in your underpants instead of getting a real job. Probably mooching off your parents.
06/04/09
$3,000 for a one-time/rare occasion is not that much at all if you have the income. If you make as much as the guy in the article, losing out on $3,000 would suck, but it wouldn't make him pinch pennies the next time he went to the grocery store either.
In short: grow up.
06/04/09
(thanks Lindsay!)
06/04/09
Thanks for posting that video Jesus; I don't know how I hadn't seen that one, but it's definitely one of their better songs.
I hope this little contest gets this guy some attention and he finds his next true love. And I hope, for the sake of the contest winner, that he hasn't hidden it up a sheep's bum just out of spite.
06/04/09
06/04/09
06/04/09
Personally, I'd sell the damn thing and spend the proceeds on a wild night of hookers and blow.
My wife would absolutely appreciate that.
06/04/09
06/04/09
My 1/2 still wears her 10 Diamond wedding ring. They total a whopping 1/10 of a carat.
We go on 20 next week.....
:)
I should get her a magnifying glass....
06/04/09
While they are not as good as the paper clip, diamonds are still pretty nice. We ladies love shiny objects; they temporarily blind us with sparkle, so you guys have a chance to sneak up on us when we are distracted. I am pretty sure thats how its been done since the first caveman distracted the first cavewoman with a pretty rock, so he could drag her back to his cave by her hair, and DeBeers was formed.
06/04/09
"shiny objects; they temporarily blind us with sparkle..."
Hummmmm.... sound like Apple to me!
In the mean time... :
+ Watch video
:)
06/04/09
06/04/09
Jeebus. Not much? I think that's more than enough.
06/04/09
06/04/09
06/04/09
I think that it is...
Here's what you "should" do (at least according to me-please note that I am not a consortium trying to control the world's market of anything...barring, of course, magnetite, but that's for the death ray and not strictly for capitalist gain)-
You "should" find someone who's going to be happy with what you want to give her...and if that absolutely must be a ring, then you "should" find a ring that you're comfortable giving her-there are no standards to be met other than the ones you set-don't worry about making the diamond growers of the world happy, worry about your future wife (or husband, whichever, but I think that the rings are a little different).
06/04/09
06/04/09
06/04/09
06/04/09
06/04/09
Diamonds have value because De Beers has tricked us into believing they have value. The 1947 marketing blitz, "A Diamond is Forever", is designed to keep us sheep from flooding the market with millions of secondhand diamonds, propping up their inflated markups.
06/04/09
05/23/09
05/23/09
05/23/09
05/23/09
...one hour at a time.