Gizmodo 
Enter your username and password.
Tip your editors:
Editorial Director:
Brian Lam | | Twitter
Editor:
Jason Chen
| AIM | Twitter
Features Editor:
Wilson Rothman
| Twitter
Senior Contributing Editors:
Jesus Diaz
| AIM | Twitter
Mark Wilson, Reviews
| AIM | Twitter
Contributing Editors:
Matt Buchanan
| AIM | Twitter
Adam Frucci
| Twitter
Sean Fallon
| Twitter
Jack Loftus
| Twitter
John Herrman
| Twitter
Dan Nosowitz
Chris Mascari
Danny Allen
| Twitter
Rosa Golijan
| Twitter
Chris Jacob
Columnist:
Brendan I. Koerner
Interns:
Don Nguyen
Kyle VanHemert
Comment Account Questions:
Original material is licensed under a Creative Commons License permitting non-commercial sharing with attribution.
03/20/09
I'm on AT&T (with an iPhone) and looking at either the Bold or this.
03/20/09
03/20/09
"meh, what does Gizmodo know, you bunch of nerds" I just smiled and said "yup and proud of it!"
So is Giz going mainstream? Just don't go the way of Hip Hop.... once they let her out she was never the same.....
03/20/09
My endorsement consists of two premises:
1) Does it work as advertised?
2) Is it worth risking an ETF?
My iPhone was worth risking an ETF but it does not work as advertised. Which is why I've told Jobs that I won't endorse the iPhone.
My BlackBerry Curve worked as advertised but the overall plastickiness of it was not worth risking an ETF. I would not change carriers for it, so Catherine Zeta-Jones didn't have to sleep with me to keep me on T-Mo. Of course, I didn't tell her that.
To all the handset makers out there -
If both questions result in a "yes", you get my endorsement. Just imagine this copy in your next ad:
"OMG! Ponies! says this smartphone works as advertised and is worth the possibility of an onerous ETF. He also says he wants bacon. The rest of his statements are not fit for broadcast."
03/19/09
This may put Verizon over the top... and I can keep the psuedo myfavs plan with them as well.....
Choices Choices