• Gizmodo
  • bestmodo
  • lifehacker
  • kotaku
  • Profile logout login

#nikons1000pj#gtmicrosoft

Gizmodo

Share Cancel
   
Upload an image | Add an image URL
×

logging in
  • FAQ. Include # before tag:
  • #tips,
  • #whitenoise,
  • #dealzmodo,
  • #broken,
  • etc.

New York, 8:38 AM
Fri Dec 18
69 posts in the last 24 hours

FR | IT | DE | SP | JP | AU | BR

Gizmodo Team

Tip your editors:

Editorial Director:
Brian Lam | | Twitter

Editor:
Jason Chen
| AIM | Twitter

Features Editor:
Wilson Rothman
| Twitter

Senior Contributing Editors:
Jesus Diaz
| AIM | Twitter
Mark Wilson, Reviews
| AIM | Twitter

Contributing Editors:
Matt Buchanan
| AIM | Twitter
Adam Frucci
| Twitter
Sean Fallon
| Twitter
Jack Loftus
| Twitter
John Herrman
| Twitter
Dan Nosowitz

Chris Mascari

Kat Hannaford
| Twitter
Rosa Golijan
| Twitter
Chris Jacob

Columnist:
Brendan I. Koerner

Interns:
Don Nguyen

Kyle VanHemert

Heroes and Friends

Comment Account Questions:

SUBSCRIBE TO Gizmodo RSS

New: Breaking news and daily top stories via email
9515 Subscribers
Gizmodo
  • Your version of Internet Explorer is not supported. Please upgrade to the most recent version in order to view comments.
    Dsmvwl  Admin  Promote to frontpage Approve user Ban user ×
    Image of Noobs-R-Us Noobs-R-Us
    11/11/09

    In reply to Nikon S1000pj Projector Camera Review: Screw You All, I Love This Thing
    Wow! What a low tech stove. #nikons100pj
     Reply
    Noobs-R-Us was starred Noobs-R-Us was unstarred
    Image of farcedude farcedude
    11/11/09

    In reply to Nikon S1000pj Projector Camera Review: Screw You All, I Love This Thing
    I think what I'd want instead is a separate pocket projector that I could plug an sd card into (among other inputs) and look at the pictures that way. I think this is one of those areas that two separate devices can do better than one. What I hope this does is move the technology along to where a less expensive (<$100) pocket projecter is a possibility. #nikons100pj
     Reply
    farcedude was starred farcedude was unstarred
    Image of bobdobbs bobdobbs
    10/02/09

    In reply to How You Stuff a Projector Inside of a Digital Camera
    This is great, Nikon. How about forgoing the useless gadgets and producing a P&S that isn't useless over ISO 200?
     Reply
    bobdobbs was starred bobdobbs was unstarred
    Image of Gary_7vn Gary_7vn
    10/02/09

    In reply to How You Stuff a Projector Inside of a Digital Camera
    What does "surprisingly bright" mean in lumens, or failing that, real world performance?
     Reply
    Gary_7vn was starred Gary_7vn was unstarred
    Image of Barry99705 Barry99705
    08/04/09

    In reply to In the Nikon S1000pj Future, There Is No Escape From Baby Pictures
    Beyond 2000. I miss that show.
     Reply
    Barry99705 was starred Barry99705 was unstarred
    Image of yelohbird yelohbird
    08/04/09

    In reply to In the Nikon S1000pj Future, There Is No Escape From Baby Pictures
    AMAZING!!
    The In-Camera Red-Eye Fix even fixes the girl's smile!
     Reply
    ZaxxonQ.com promoted this comment yelohbird was starred yelohbird was unstarred
    Image of ZaxxonQ.com ZaxxonQ.com
    08/05/09

    @yelohbird: ROFL! I noticed that, too! ^_^
     Reply
    ZaxxonQ.com was starred ZaxxonQ.com was unstarred
    Image of ZaxxonQ.com ZaxxonQ.com
    08/04/09

    In reply to In the Nikon S1000pj Future, There Is No Escape From Baby Pictures
    Dude was flapping that camera around, yet the picture remained stable? 0_o Subtle.
     Reply
    ZaxxonQ.com was starred ZaxxonQ.com was unstarred
    Image of kitsuneconundrum kitsuneconundrum
    08/04/09

    @ZaxxonQ.com: yeah, that was kinda obvious. No fine print on the bottom of the screen?
     Reply
    kitsuneconundrum was starred kitsuneconundrum was unstarred
    Image of AmphetamineCrown AmphetamineCrown
    08/04/09

    @ZaxxonQ.com: Same thing I noticed, right off the bat. Probably a little low price-wise for built-in steadycam... ;)
     Reply
    AmphetamineCrown was starred AmphetamineCrown was unstarred
    Image of Tito Tito
    08/04/09

    @kitsuneconundrum: The fine print was at the end of the video.
     Reply
    ZaxxonQ.com promoted this comment Tito was starred Tito was unstarred
    Image of aelver aelver
    08/04/09

    @ZaxxonQ.com: Yeah totally ... can anyone say 'simulated'. I hear another law suit coming :)
     Reply
    ZaxxonQ.com promoted this comment aelver was starred aelver was unstarred
    Image of Max Nicholson Max Nicholson
    08/04/09

    @AmphetamineCrown: I can always count on Gizmodo readers to notice the same things I see in cheesy commercials.
    _Max
     Reply
    ZaxxonQ.com promoted this comment Max Nicholson was starred Max Nicholson was unstarred
    Earlier discussions Other discussions Show all discussions Show featured discussions only Start a new discussion

Login

Enter your username and password.

Please enter a username.
Please enter your password.
logging in
Login via Facebook | Sign Up | Forgot Password?

Reset Password

Please enter your email address to have your password reset.

Please enter your email address.
Please enter a valid email address.
requesting password reset

Register

Registering will give you a user profile and the ability to add other users as friends. To become a commenter, however, you need to audition.

Want to know more? Consult the Comment FAQ and legal terms.

Please enter a username.
Please enter a password.
Please confirm your password.
Passwords are not identical.
Please enter a valid email address.
registration sent, waiting for reply

Submit Your Comment

You don't need to login to comment. Just enter your email address below.

See how your address will be displayed in the Comment FAQ.

Please enter a valid email address.
Please enter a valid email address.
logging in

Login with your Facebook or Gizmodo account.

Sign up here.



  • Archives
  • About
  • Advertising
  • Legal
  • Help
  • Report a Bug
  • FAQ
Original material is licensed under a Creative Commons License permitting non-commercial sharing with attribution.