<![CDATA[Gizmodo: nuclear power]]> http://tags.gizmodo.com/assets/base/img/thumbs140x140/gizmodo.com.png <![CDATA[Gizmodo: nuclear power]]> http://gizmodo.com/tag/nuclearpower http://gizmodo.com/tag/nuclearpower <![CDATA[1979: The Year We Wussed Out on Nuclear Power]]> The China Syndrome was a movie about how dangerous nuclear power plants are that, fortunately for the producers, came out 12 days before the Three Mile Island disaster. You can thank it for why we're still reliant on coal power.

The name of the movie refers to a downright-preposterous idea that if a nuclear power plant in America melted down, it would melt through the entire Earth and pop out in China. Yeah, that's about how smart the science in this movie is.

The timing of the movie coming out tying in with Three Mile Island may have been lucky for the producers, who suddenly had a huge blockbuster hit on their hands, but it was less lucky for boosters of safe nuclear energy. Since that meltdown, the production of nuclear power plants has gone down significantly despite the fact that there were no deaths or even recorded cases of cancer caused by Three Mile Island—the amount of radiation that the people near the plant were exposed to is said to be similar to that of getting an X-ray.

Instead, we had a movie that hysterically made up fake info about the danger of nuclear power and the evil intentions of those behind power plants that turned a relatively minor accident into a huge outcry against nuclear power. And now here we are 30 years later, still skittish about what is probably the safest and most eco-friendly source of power we've got. Thanks for nothing, Jack Lemmon! [Chart via Wikipedia]

Gizmodo '79 is a week-long celebration of gadgets and geekdom 30 years ago, as the analog age gave way to the digital, and most of our favorite toys were just being born.

]]>
http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5316455&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Backyard Nuclear Reactors Now In Production, Cost $25 Million Each]]> I have to admit, I'm finally starting to believe that Hyperion Power's plans to install nuclear reactors in the backyards of America's neighborhoods is actually going to happen. In fact, after learning that they have already begun construction on the first 4,000 units I have no doubt that they will make their 2013 deadline as well. If you were wondering how much these "affordable" reactors would cost, Hyperion has put a $25 million price tag on each unit—which breaks down to about $2500 per household on a 10,000 home grid and it can run for five years without maintenance.

That's actually pretty cheap when you consider how much most households spend on electricity in a single year. In fact, Hyperion's reactors can reliably power up to 20,000 homes each—reducing the price of energy to about 10 cents per watt. Again, the idea has a lot of upside, but let's not forget that they still have not developed a way to eliminate the waste it will generate (even a softball-sized amount over 5 years will add up), and burying a radioactive device in our backyards may be a hard-sell for some communities. [Hyperion via Money via DVICE]

]]>
http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5083522&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Backyard Nuclear Reactor Should Be Ready to Ship by 2013]]> Hyperion Power's plans to develop and sell portable nuclear reactors first came to light last year—but most people probably brushed off the idea as some sort of fantasy. Whether that is true or not, Hyperion seems to be committed to the project. A recent interview with Hyperion CEO John Deal revealed that they have every intention of shipping their first product in June of 2013.

He also revealed a few interesting tidbits about their system including the following quote about the possibility of turning their fuel into a bomb:

Our fuel is very unique. It's uranium hydride. UH3 is the chemical formula. Low-enriched, about 10 percent [uranium isotope]-235, the rest is U-238. By comparison, bomb-grade fuel is about 98 percent enriched.

On the problem of nuclear waste:

The waste that comes out of our reactor after powering 20,000 homes for 8-10 years is about the size of a football. Using coal and gas over the same time frame, the waste stream for just you, after factoring in CO2 emissions, would overflow Mile High Stadium in Denver. So our waste stream is very concentrated, and yes, we have to do something with it, but there are known ways of dealing with it. For security reasons, we're not disclosing what will happen to it, but it's not going to just sit in some bucket somewhere. Recycling was "baked in" to our reactor design from the beginning.

I can't say that any of this chatter has done much to overcome my skepticism, but word is that he actually found a buyer for that first backyard system scheduled for 2013. So we will have to wait and see if this will be the next big thing in power production. [Hyperion Power and Techrockies via Treehugger]

]]>
http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5054950&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Toshiba: F*** the Format War, We're Going Nuclear (No, Really)]]> Who needs to wage a costly format war when you could build nuclear power plants? That's Toshiba's thinking exactly. They just launched a brand new company, Toshiba America Nuclear Energy Corp., which will "enhance" its nuclear power business in the US. Um...what? [Yahoo!/Reuters]

]]>
http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=364573&view=rss&microfeed=true