Senior Contributing Editors:
Jesus Diaz
| AIM | Twitter
Mark Wilson, Reviews
| AIM | Twitter
Contributing Editors:
Matt Buchanan | AIM | Twitter
Adam Frucci | Twitter
Sean Fallon | Twitter
Jack Loftus | Twitter
John Herrman | Twitter
Dan Nosowitz
Chris Mascari
Danny Allen | Twitter
Rosa Golijan | Twitter
Chris Jacob
This guy does some simply amazing work... I've spoken with him personally and can tell you for a fact that he pours his heart into his mods. When I get the money I'm DEFINITELY going to have him do a full mod for me. www.mnpctech.com is his website - check out some of his other stuff.
@Eclyps19: I looked at some of see his other mods and they seem pretty standard. I would have to say that this featured piece is certainly his best by far. #nvidiaioncubemodcontest
This is one of those things that I'd find extremely awesome, yet would file a restraining order against, stating that it has to remain outside 100 feet from my desk. #nvidiaioncubemodcontest
@nocar: Ah so many memories with that cube. Joining people in spinning it as fast as we can, with just a twinge of morbid hope that it falls on top of someone. #nvidiaioncubemodcontest
From what I heard, Adobe's posturing is somewhat bullshit.
Apparently Adobe is holding out Flash for the iPhone in exchange to Apple agreeing not to develop more Applications that hurt Adobe's bottom line (IE more Aperture/Final Cut Pro like products)
Apple likewise is telling them to get bent.
Thus Adobe's claim that Apple is keeping them from being on the iPhone.
@Jim Topoleski: I've never believed anything you've said because it's contradicted by common sense. Why then would Adobe not tell Microsoft to stop developing Silverlight in exchange for support? Or Google to stop pushing for HTML5 video integration? You know it doesn't make sense. Moreover, there are already several good media editing alternatives. I doubt that Adobe is just worried about FC Pro.
@Nigromancer: It's about the impact of the items against their own products. Your saying Microsoft Silverlight and Adobe's laughing. HTML5 has yet to really take off and as for video editing, Avid has fallen way off the charts along with Premier. For someone that's so knowledgeable like yourself, you haven't had a single thing to contribute in your entire existence on Gizmodo. Why even bother posting if all you can do scream "sticks and stones will break my bones but words will never hurt me!?!?!?!"
@imTheKing: Furthermore, the entire point of Jim and you is contradicted by what Adobe posted on their page:
"When will Flash Player be available on the iPhone?
Adobe needs full support from Apple beyond what is available through the SDK to enable Web browsing of Flash-based content on the iPhone. While we have been working hard to make the browser plug-in available, without increased co-operation from Apple, it will not be possible. Adobe is therefore focusing our development work on the major smartphone platforms that are working with us to deliver the most innovative and complete web browsing experience. With more than 85 percent of the top 100 websites using Flash and approximately 75% of all videos on the Web using Flash, we still believe that Flash on the iPhone would greatly benefit the millions of joint Apple and Adobe customers."
Just to further emphasize to you two, it would indicate that Apple's SDK isn't open enough for Adobe to implement flash, as I referenced in my previous post.
@Nigromancer: So your reading Adobe's PR page and calling it the truth? Since when do people go onto a companies website to find out the truth about a particular subject when it comes to competition and the release of a particular framework on a product. "Apple's SDK isn't open enough" - aka the two companies are bumping heads for another reason. It has little to do with the fact that the SDK is not "open enough".
And just as a note, I've given plenty of information under the table to Mark W and others of the Giz staff.
What's really unrealistic is that you believe companies are looking to better their consumers lives. These companies are looking to make money and if you really think they give a shit about what you do / feel like / wish for, your well out of touch.
@imTheKing: "Avid has fallen way off the charts along with Premier."
I've heard the exact opposite; most people are getting pissed that Apple have seemed to stop supporting Final Cut. Avid is still the industry standard (even Pixar uses Avid), and Premier supports importing raw HD video.
@imTheKing: Relax, Nigromancer has hate for a particular number of posters here who dont share his viewpoint, or insight into the industry. He has constantly trolled my posts as of late no matter which Gawker site I post on.
Its well known there have been battles between Adobe and Apple since Final Cut Pro was released, and only continued with iPhoto, then Aperture. The fact that Nigromancer doesn't believe this viewpoint which can be verified in NUMEROUS magazine and online articles as well as inside sources is not withstanding.
I just ignore his posts. They have been mostly irrelevant., both the ones he makes attacking me and others here, as well as his own "insight".
@imTheKing: Where did I mention that companies are working to better their consumers lives? That's a blatant misreading of my post. I said it would be foolhardy for anyone to expect that a business would do something that would be to the consumers benefit rather than the business's.
@klinefelter: Although the last statistic done on Video Application marketshare was in 2007, it showed FCP at around 50%, Avid at around 20% and then Premier at an even lower rate.
As for industry standard, Avid is no longer. When it comes to editing the movies you watch in theaters, majority of them are on FCP. Apple even won awards for movies such as Curious Case of Benjamin Button and so forth. They also were the first to support RED raw cinema footage and they have been the leader in supporting upcoming video standards.
Either way, there is really little argument that FCP has taken the video market in the least, without even touching base on the audio market it's cannibalized.
@imTheKing: Moreover, it is a good criticism that you cited me taking it from the Adobe's page. That's legitimately not the best place to get it.
However, seeing as how what was discussed at the beginning of this thread was an attributable rumor, I felt it was better to go with something that at least had attribution. It can be debated the bias of the attributed source (clearly, they're biased), but at least they can be analyzed. I wouldn't trust general rumors until they can be substantiated.
@Nigromancer: You know, it's not that I disagree with your first comments about all companies having their flaws and not always having the upper hand, but being completely realistic, the consumer is almost never first. 99% of the time, the company will do what it can to make the money while crippling the consumer. That's just modern day business tactics.
@imTheKing: Thanks for retyping out that wikipedia article for me. It has 50% because it is cheap, and that poll is 2 years old.
They don't support raw R3D footage. They support R3D footage that had been transcoded to ProRes. There is a considerable waiting period between filming and editing, and does not allow color correction afterwards. Premiere allows for native R3D editing, and is still the best editing program for RED cameras.
@imTheKing: I never implied that they are first. I think it would be silly to think that they are first. I think, at this point, we can agree we're on the same page on this contention. Companies act in their own best interest. Where it intersects with consumers, both win; where it conflicts, consumers will lose. This is an area where it conflicts (from both Adobe's and, maybe, Apple's stances) so iPhone/Touch consumers are losing.
The RED ONE camera generates QuickTime reference movies that point to 4K (or 2K) full resolution REDCODE™ RAW (.R3D) files. This allows for immediate editing of camera source footage when using the latest version of Final Cut Pro.
The new version of FCP isnt called FCP anymore btw, its now called FCS, because the rolled in motion and soundtrack as part of the application now. The latest version of FCP is FCP7.
As much as I love my iPhone I am really getting tired of all the little issues like MMS, tethering, flash, etc. They're like a splinter...small but stinging and a constant irritant.
HTC, Samsung, Sony, and Motorola have proven that Android can be beautiful, now we just need a larger app store and the right hardware and I'm gone.
@Kiamat: FWIW, Android does have a pretty substantial Market. If the numbers game matters to you, they've passed the 10,000 app mark. For my own experience, I've never had a problem finding a decent app for just about everything I need. And the big sites are starting to take notice of Android. Facebook's finally got their own app. There's Pandora, last.fm and Jamendo (my personal favorite) apps. Twidroid, Phone Flicks, and Flixter...my point is there's not a shortage of apps for Android like there is with the Pre or....well, I guess the Pre would really be the only major other competitor.
Not to mention the fact that you can install third-party apps without their presence in the market. Evernote just released a beta app ([lifehacker.com]), and while it's not in the market, you can install it from the URL on their forums. So, if an app gets pulled from the market, it's still not your last chance to get it. And Market pulls are rare to begin with.
The hardware, though, I'm there with you. My G1 could use a speed boost. Maybe the Verizon Sholes/Tao/Whatever? :-)
@Kiamat: I haven't used any of those services, so I don't know, but if you want to poke around the Android market, check out [www.androlib.com] AThis site can browse all of the apps on the market, plus the comments and ratings from users. Take a look and see if you can find what you're looking for.
As for GPS, I've never really had much of a problem getting an accurate read, and it follows really well while driving. I've just recently discovered that you can get general locations from the wireless networks without using GPS (they're two separate switches and I'm not sure how I misunderstood them for so long). So it may be possible to use some location-based services without actually wasting battery power on GPS
For the storage thing, I'll admit we're kinda weak on that one. The Sholes/Tao/Whatever that's coming to Verizon will allegedly have 16GB of on-board storage with expansion via a MicroSD slot, but with that (and maybe a couple other exceptions), the storage situation tends to look kinda bleak on Android phones without a MicroSD card.
11/16/09
11/16/09
11/16/09
11/16/09
11/16/09
11/16/09
Looks like the "Alamo" cube at Astor Place in NYC: #nvidiaioncubemodcontest
11/16/09
11/16/09
Even though their aesthetics don't match mine, it looks like a stunning piece of engineering to get all that right... #nvidiaioncubemodcontest
10/16/09
10/17/09
USB 1.1 – 15 Mbps
FireWire (1394a) – 400 Mbps
USB 2.0 – 480 Mbps
FireWire 800 (1394b) – 800 Mpbs
SATA – 1.5 Gbps
SATA II – 3.0 Gbps
----------------------
Next Generation:
----------------------
USB 3.0 – 4.8 Gbps
Next-Gen FireWire – 6.4 Gbps
SATA III – 6 Gbps
Hope this helps!
dallen@gizmodo.com
10/16/09
10/17/09
10/16/09
10/16/09
10/11/09
10/11/09
10/05/09
10/05/09
Apparently Adobe is holding out Flash for the iPhone in exchange to Apple agreeing not to develop more Applications that hurt Adobe's bottom line (IE more Aperture/Final Cut Pro like products)
Apple likewise is telling them to get bent.
Thus Adobe's claim that Apple is keeping them from being on the iPhone.
10/05/09
10/05/09
10/05/09
"When will Flash Player be available on the iPhone?
Adobe needs full support from Apple beyond what is available through the SDK to enable Web browsing of Flash-based content on the iPhone. While we have been working hard to make the browser plug-in available, without increased co-operation from Apple, it will not be possible. Adobe is therefore focusing our development work on the major smartphone platforms that are working with us to deliver the most innovative and complete web browsing experience. With more than 85 percent of the top 100 websites using Flash and approximately 75% of all videos on the Web using Flash, we still believe that Flash on the iPhone would greatly benefit the millions of joint Apple and Adobe customers."
[labs.adobe.com]
Just to further emphasize to you two, it would indicate that Apple's SDK isn't open enough for Adobe to implement flash, as I referenced in my previous post.
10/05/09
And just as a note, I've given plenty of information under the table to Mark W and others of the Giz staff.
What's really unrealistic is that you believe companies are looking to better their consumers lives. These companies are looking to make money and if you really think they give a shit about what you do / feel like / wish for, your well out of touch.
10/05/09
I've heard the exact opposite; most people are getting pissed that Apple have seemed to stop supporting Final Cut. Avid is still the industry standard (even Pixar uses Avid), and Premier supports importing raw HD video.
10/05/09
10/05/09
Its well known there have been battles between Adobe and Apple since Final Cut Pro was released, and only continued with iPhoto, then Aperture. The fact that Nigromancer doesn't believe this viewpoint which can be verified in NUMEROUS magazine and online articles as well as inside sources is not withstanding.
I just ignore his posts. They have been mostly irrelevant., both the ones he makes attacking me and others here, as well as his own "insight".
10/05/09
10/05/09
As for industry standard, Avid is no longer. When it comes to editing the movies you watch in theaters, majority of them are on FCP. Apple even won awards for movies such as Curious Case of Benjamin Button and so forth. They also were the first to support RED raw cinema footage and they have been the leader in supporting upcoming video standards.
Either way, there is really little argument that FCP has taken the video market in the least, without even touching base on the audio market it's cannibalized.
10/05/09
However, seeing as how what was discussed at the beginning of this thread was an attributable rumor, I felt it was better to go with something that at least had attribution. It can be debated the bias of the attributed source (clearly, they're biased), but at least they can be analyzed. I wouldn't trust general rumors until they can be substantiated.
10/05/09
10/05/09
They don't support raw R3D footage. They support R3D footage that had been transcoded to ProRes. There is a considerable waiting period between filming and editing, and does not allow color correction afterwards. Premiere allows for native R3D editing, and is still the best editing program for RED cameras.
10/05/09
10/05/09
10/05/09
The RED ONE camera generates QuickTime reference movies that point to 4K (or 2K) full resolution REDCODE™ RAW (.R3D) files. This allows for immediate editing of camera source footage when using the latest version of Final Cut Pro.
[www.red.com]
The new version of FCP isnt called FCP anymore btw, its now called FCS, because the rolled in motion and soundtrack as part of the application now. The latest version of FCP is FCP7.
10/05/09
HTC, Samsung, Sony, and Motorola have proven that Android can be beautiful, now we just need a larger app store and the right hardware and I'm gone.
10/05/09
Not to mention the fact that you can install third-party apps without their presence in the market. Evernote just released a beta app ([lifehacker.com]), and while it's not in the market, you can install it from the URL on their forums. So, if an app gets pulled from the market, it's still not your last chance to get it. And Market pulls are rare to begin with.
The hardware, though, I'm there with you. My G1 could use a speed boost. Maybe the Verizon Sholes/Tao/Whatever? :-)
10/05/09
On the other hand, I like loading my Digital Copies on my iPhone (part of the reason I'm moving from an 8GB 3G to a 32GB 3GS).
What's the GPS situation like on Android? What about music? Do they have Slacker, Shoutcast, and Rhapsody? Those are biggies for me.
10/05/09
As for GPS, I've never really had much of a problem getting an accurate read, and it follows really well while driving. I've just recently discovered that you can get general locations from the wireless networks without using GPS (they're two separate switches and I'm not sure how I misunderstood them for so long). So it may be possible to use some location-based services without actually wasting battery power on GPS
For the storage thing, I'll admit we're kinda weak on that one. The Sholes/Tao/Whatever that's coming to Verizon will allegedly have 16GB of on-board storage with expansion via a MicroSD slot, but with that (and maybe a couple other exceptions), the storage situation tends to look kinda bleak on Android phones without a MicroSD card.
Anyways, good luck finding the phone for you!
10/05/09