<![CDATA[Gizmodo: nytimes]]> http://tags.gizmodo.com/assets/base/img/thumbs140x140/gizmodo.com.png <![CDATA[Gizmodo: nytimes]]> http://gizmodo.com/tag/nytimes http://gizmodo.com/tag/nytimes <![CDATA[Nick Bilton the Lead Blogger at NYT Bits]]> My good friend Nick Bilton is going to the NYTimes Bits blog as their lead writer. Nick was Design Integration Editor in the NYT newsroom and a UI specialist in their R&D labs for quite awhile before that, but took a break to work on his book, I Live in the Future: & Here's How It Works. [Nick Bilton]

]]>
http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5401598&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[How Superman Might Read the NY Times]]> The Infractor is probably the least efficient manner in which you could read the morning paper, but it involves Fortress of Solitude-esque prisms and interactive rays of light. Quite simply, the paper has never looked better. Video demo:

Running on what looks to be a Microsoft Surface the Reactable, Infractor is a piece of software that represents all of the NYTimes as a streaming beam of light, with individual stories floating through the stream like fireflies. Placing an interactive prism on the table splits this beam, allowing you to assign filters like "Obama" to make the stream more relevant. (A jog wheel, placed next to the prism, can alter the prism's specific sensitivity.)

Eventually, you'll tailor the beam to only hold topics you're interested in. Well, that, or you'll remember why the printing press doesn't use prisms to convey information. [Infractor via notcot]

]]>
http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5397841&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[On That NYTimes Editor's Mention of the Apple Tablet]]> A lot of people are writing up this video of the NYTimes Editor "leaking" the Apple Tablet (see 8:20 in the video) in this supposedly off record talk. But this isn't proof of anything.

It could easily just be that Bill Keller reads rumors, too. But what if that was a whoopsie letting loose a secret that Bill knows with first hand knowledge? So what? We already know it's coming, having talked to people who have seen and heard things first hand. And we do know the NYTimes is involved with the project. So that's just more of what we already know, but in a way that's not really more proof.

Silly. [gawker]

]]>
http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5390120&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Hey New York Times! Fix Your Stupid iPhone App]]> If you'll allow me, I'd like to unleash a small personal diatribe. I promise it'll be brief. But I've been suffering through the buggy pile of crap that is the New York Times iPhone app for long enough.

Seriously, how hard can it be to make this app work? It's so ridiculously simple. It needs to download and organize text and some small photos. That's it. No video, no animations, nothing that reacts to you shaking or tilting the phone. It's clearly very doable on the iPhone, yet it freezes up and crashes almost every single time I use it.

I'll be scrolling down an article and all of the sudden the phone stops responding to either the touchscreen or the buttons. After a minute or two of tapping and hitting the home button and the sleep button with no response, the screen will turn off, the app having shut down. When I turn the app back on, I need to then find the article I was reading again.

In effect, it pushes me to just surf over to NYTimes.com in Safari, as that never crashes and, once I pull up an article, is just as easy to read. But finding articles is much nicer on the app, as it's designed for the iPhone rather than a computer.

And this version is a fix to a previous version that would hang forever when updating, making the app even less usable. And while I appreciate the fact that it updates without locking up, being able to read the articles without locking up would be a great next step.

And the fact is, this has the potential to be one of the best apps out there. Apple showed it off on stage! And since the New York Times is the biggest newspaper out there, this should be a flagship news app. If it worked properly it would certainly be the app I used the most.

I know you guys have bigger things to worry about, like not going out of business due to the impending death of the newspaper industry, but seriously, put a programmer on this for a day. That's all it will take, because in case you didn't notice, this is an insanely simple program, and it shouldn't take much to get it working right. It's been long enough.

]]>
http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5081985&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[HTC's Magic Labs]]> The NYTimes's profile on HTC's billionaire founder and Chairwoman Cher Wang reveals some interesting facts about the company. The most fun being HTC's R&D think tank is called Magic Labs, where engineers have titles like Mechanical Wizard and Chief Innovation Wizard. They've also got a writer and jeweler among their 50 lucky staff, but probably no barbarians or clerics. The labs churn about 1000 ideas before they come up with a handful that make it to production, one of which was the UI in the HTC TouchFlo. With Android just about here, here's hoping they do more than just wrap pretty around WM.

—Cher Wang is a former Oakland, CA, resident and UC Berkeley Alum. She started as a music major and finished in economics.
—HTC made 1 out of every 6 phones sold in the US this year, most of them branded by other companies
—Two years ago, they started branding their devices.
—Cher got the idea for HTC when working at computer part maker FIC. As she hauled parts she hoped to sell, she wondered what it would be like when computers were not as heavy.

[NYTimes]

]]>
http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5053464&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[NY Times Profiles Power Saw Drag Racing; Look Out, Baseball!]]> Today, the New York Times took a close look at the fast-paced world of power tool drag racing. The inherent fun of placing lightly modified power tools on the ground and watching them tear off down the street was not lost on them, apparently. Will attention from such a big publication make power tool drag racing a more mainstream sport? One can only hope. The Times even links to all sorts of how-to's from sites like Instructables and Make. Get on board now, before ESPN ruins it! [NY Times]

]]>
http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5034250&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Predictable Yet Still Entertaining: John Dvorak Calls Out NYT and WSJ for Shilling Apple]]> Yes he does. Every Apple launch, at least one tech journalist goes meta and calls out other journalists for being Apple shills. Meanwhile, PC Mag gives the iPhone a 4/5 rating with Editor's Choice, John likes Macs, and there's an icon on his column for "More iPhone coverage". Oh people, don't you know he's just getting you riled up to get attention and links?...I guess that worked. Man, the guy is a genius. [PC Mag]

]]>
http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5026888&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[NY Times Reader for Mac Beta: Free for Now]]> Not so hot on the heels of its Microsoft-built Windows-based counterpart, the Times Reader beta has been made available for all members of NYTimes.com. Although a Silverlight install is required, it's relatively painless and a small price to pay for Reader's efficient news presentation and old-timey typefaces. There are no subscription fees for now, but Mac users can expect to join the $14.95-a-month party when the software goes final. [NY Times via TUAW]

]]>
http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=392879&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[NYTimes: Pogue's Livescribe Pulse Smartpen Video]]> David Pogue has a quick video review of Livescribe's Pulse Smartpen that does a very good job of illustrating the concept. Worth watching on top of our own review. [Pogue's Livescribe Pulse Smartpen Video review]

]]>
http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=389331&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Stephen Chao — who was fired from...]]>

Stephen Chao — who was fired from a top position at the News Corporation after, in separate incidents, hiring a male stripper to disrobe at a company meeting and nearly drowning Rupert Murdoch’s dog at a party — plans to announce on Wednesday the formation of a Web video company that he hopes to build into an educational alternative to YouTube. [www.nytimes.com]

]]>
http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5002702&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[NYTimes: CES Sucks]]> The NYTimes has a piece on CES suggesting that the high signal to noise ratio is making it increasingly difficult for companies to leave their mark here and launch a successful product. Yes. Yes, I agree. Please, bring back the summer CES session, and split this beast in half. I think companies understand this. So many bigger brands are starting to hold their own spring line shows, like Sony does, to stand in a more focused spotlight. [NYT]

]]>
http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=341469&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Pogue Reviews the OLPC]]>
David Pogue is right about the OLPC in his NYTimes column this week. For those of you who haven't kept up with the changes in the One Laptop Per Child he sums it up nicely, demoing all the engineering miracles in the machine, addressing the low minded complaints of "snarky bloggers" (Where?!), going on to explain why it's an interesting and important thing for the developing world. The video does a great job, so I'll recommend you watch the video above. It definitely convinced me: Even more so than water or malaria shots or food, kids in third world countries need this PC. (David, I'm kidding. Nice column this week.) [NYTimes]

]]>
http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=307829&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Why Does Japan Get All The Super-Fast Fiber Optic Love?]]> The New York Times just took a peek into the world of Japanese fiber optic broadband, which we all know is much faster and cheaper than ours. While we here in the States might view the Japanese broadband market as some utopia where entire HD movies can be downloaded in seconds, it's not quite that simple.

It seems that NTT, the biggest fiber provider in Japan, has a lot of the same issues Verizon does here: they need to get permission from landlords to hook buildings up with fiber, and once they do they still need to convince people to sign up for it. And after all the big apartment and condo buildings are hooked up, they're stuck doing individual houses.

Overall, setting up a fiber optic network is a very expensive prospect with no real guarantees to making all that money back. Without a lot of current applications that utilize such crazy speeds, there just isn't a big enough demand to justify the expense. So why does Japan throw caution to the wind and spend all sorts of cash to set up this speedy network even though it might not be the most fiscally responsible thing to do in the world?

Well, one of the big reasons is that the Japanese government provides tax incentives for companies to do so, while our government has done basically nothing to encourage a nationwide fiber network. Despite the fact that setting up a completely new wired infrastructure is an incredibly expensive undertaking (just ask Verizon), companies in America are supposed to do it all themselves and make it profitable, something that might not make sense with this situation.

Matteo Bortesi, a technology consultant at Accenture in Tokyo, said that "the Japanese think long-term. If they think they will benefit in 100 years, they will invest for their grandkids. There's a bit of national pride we don't see in the West." I'm pretty sure there's more to it than just national pride and wanting to be first, but there's certainly something to be said for setting up a network now that we'll need in a few years. Chances are, eventually we'll have a nice, fast, cheap, nationwide fiber network that will allow us to download porn faster than we could ever have imagined before, but at the rate we're going, it's going to be a while. [New York Times]

]]>
http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=307203&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Two NYTimes reporters are relentlessly covering...]]> Two NYTimes reporters are relentlessly covering the iPhone Bricking episode. Saul Hansell interviews Palm and confirms that AT&T isn't worried about Treos bringing down the network, and Katie tells the tale of her daughter's iPhone bricking that had nothing to do with an unlock. I wonder what David Pogue and Walt Mossberg have to say about this issue?

]]>
http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=306374&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[I was interviewed by Katie Hafner of the...]]> I was interviewed by Katie Hafner of the NYTimes for a piece, Altered iPhones Freeze Up. The NYTimes gets how important this is to us. [NYTimes]

]]>
http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=305154&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[David Pogue reviews macro software that'll...]]> David Pogue reviews macro software that'll speed up your computer usage; he ends up with a list of 5 for the Mac and PC you might find useful. [NYT]

]]>
http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=292937&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[iPhone Applecare $80$69 For an Extra Year, Says Pogue [UPDATED: Confirmed]]]> [UPDATED: Confirmed at $69.] Applecare is supposed to be available for the iPhone this month, and the price may be $80. Joel Johnson, walker-of-Gizmodo-halls-of-lore, noticed this statement in Pogue's Missing Manual PDF, on page 277: "The iPhone comes with a one-year warranty. If you buy an Applecare contract ($80) you're covered for a second year. If, during the coverage period, anything goes wrong that's not your fault, Apple will fix it for free." Apple neither confirms or denies this price, but The NYTimes tech columnist is pretty damn good as far as sources go. [UPDATE: Nope, this wasn't a final copy of the book, so it will have to be corrected at $69.][iPhone Missing Manual via JJ's Dethroner]

]]>
http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=280368&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Nobody Picks on Pogue But Me]]> OMG, the internet is beating up Pogue for his iPhone video. We like picking on the guy, even when we're praising the authoritative, yet mainstream-accessible NYTimes gadget columnist. (See our photoshop contest entitled "Make David Pogue Cool".) And we've had our share of blog fights with the guy. But when I see the Huff Po, Valleywag, and others take shots at him without understanding how annoying it was for a gadget journalist to actually have to make a fair verdict of the iPhone amidst the buzz and anti-buzz, well, it doesn't seem right. I mean, just because you hate your job doesn't mean the rest of us have to. It's a phone, relax, people.

Maybe I'm just taking it personally, because it was a damn good idea. Oh, right, the iPhone music video was an idea we came up with together. I totally goaded him into it by telling him that its the thing that would set his work apart from Mossberg and the rest of the mainstream journalists. He was a former Broadway arranger, you know. There's no reason why he shouldn't flaunt that. If I could do every review on Gizmodo in musical form I would.

What is he supposed to do, hate it just because everyone is sick of hearing how awesome it is? Even the iPhone's hardest critics have to admit its amazing in some ways. (Have you seen our review?) Pogue just feels its worth crowing over, literally. His video still covers the flaws. He's just having a good time. It's gadgets. It's a phone. Relax Pogue critics. There's no nefarious plot to sell more books. There's just a guy who likes gadgets and did a music video about it.

]]>
http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=280078&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[The Making of David Pogue's iPhone music...]]> The Making of David Pogue's iPhone music video, with Gizmodo shoutout. [NYTimes]

]]>
http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=278001&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Pogue's iPhone Video Review]]>
This is why we love Pogue. He reviews it, goes meta, and gives Mossberg a poke. And btw, he hates AT&T's EDGE network. [NYT]

]]>
http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=272554&view=rss&microfeed=true