<![CDATA[Gizmodo: oops]]> http://tags.gizmodo.com/assets/base/img/thumbs140x140/gizmodo.com.png <![CDATA[Gizmodo: oops]]> http://gizmodo.com/tag/oops http://gizmodo.com/tag/oops <![CDATA[Wolfram Alpha Is Tired Of People Not Paying $50 Dollars For Their iPhone App]]> The first problem with the Wolfram Alpha iPhone app was that it cost $50. The second problem was that the site's iPhone web interface was nearly as good as the app, and it was free. Guess which issue Wolfram "fixed!"

TUAW noticed a not-so-subtle change to the Wolfram Alpha's mobile site, which now prompts stingy iPhone jerks to just download the app already. Luckily you can kill the prompt, but then you're left with an unoptimized version of the search engine, which is a chore to use on a mobile device.

So, Wolfram isn't moving as many copies of their app as they expected (Dozens! You'll see!) and it's totally within their rights to, you know, make money. But instead of taking away the free, slightly-less-capable alternative, why not just make the paid, slightly-more-capable app remotely affordable? What's the problem with that?

Oh. [TUAW]

]]>
http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5418419&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Why You Should Always Be Careful While Using a Forklift]]> In this video, a hapless Russian warehouse worker destroys about $250,000 of precious, precious vodka in about 3 seconds (he escaped unscathed). Insert Yakov Smirnoff joke here. [English Russia via The Daily What]

]]>
http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5395292&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Reports: Snow Leopard Bug Eats User Accounts Whole]]> A small but understandably very upset group of people are reporting a bug in Snow Leopard that totally wipes out account data without warning. The consensus is that it has something to do with guest accounts: the data loss seems to come directly after using one, when trying to log back into a regular account.

Documentation on the problem is still thin, and Apple hasn't issued any kind of response, but until this gets sussed out, you should probably cut back on the guest logins, lest you lose everything you've ever saved to your Mac, ever. Any new operating system has bugs, but if real—and it's starting to look that way—this one is pretty atrocious.

We'll keep an eye on this, since the more exposure it gets, the more likely people are to come forward with their own personal horror stories. Post 'em if you got 'em, in the comments. [ITWire via Neowin]

]]>
http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5379817&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Unfortunate Corporate Slogans, Nokia Edition: TAG YOUR IT!]]> No, this slogan isn't a typo, and yes, the English-speaking Nokia reps were extremely embarrassed about it. The best part? The phrase is written everywhere at this booth, from t-shirts to rebranded cans of soup. More idiom-related wackiness post-jump.

The tagline is actually advertising Nokia's "Point and Find" service, which is a sort of user- or corporate-generated phototagging system combined with a barcode tagger. Take a picture of your shoes, or a painting, or whatever, add in a link to its Wikipedia page or shopping link, and then whenever anyone snaps a photo of that item, they'll see your links. But retail companies can also tag their own products, so the system can be used for any item in their stores, and if worse comes to worst, you can always just scan a 2D barcode.

The slogan idea is kind of a ripoff of those eBay ads from three years ago that used the tagline "Find Your It." Unfortunately, whoever decided on "TAG YOUR IT" evidently did not go to elementary school in an English-speaking country.

The service itself isn't nearly as useful as, say, a barcode scanner, and relying on users to supply those links (instead of just going all augmented reality with Google or Wikipedia) is sort of cheating in my book, but the service isn't really the point here. The point is that there's a box of macaroni and cheese that says TAG YOUR IT on it. [Point and Find]

]]>
http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5376637&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Sprint Retracts $100 Palm Pre Deal After Only Six Hours]]> Here's how this went: AllThingsD found two explicit references on Sprint's website to a deal that gave new Sprint subscribers a Pre for $100. A few hours later, after an almost certainly hilarious "internal review," they canceled it. Uh, oops?

It's not especially strange for a company to renege on an unannounced offer or a minor typo, but that's not quite what this was. It was an offer couched in specific, deliberate language, and that was featured it two full, publicly-available information pages. In other words, it had been devised and considered—this wasn't a data input mistake.

That said, the fact that it only applied to new subscribers would've caused a PR problem for Sprint, who would be effectively penalizing their most loyal (read: preexisting) customers with the offer. And the two conflicting listed end dates did seem to indicate that maybe it wasn't fully baked. Since the deal was listed on their website, Sprint says they'll honor the service rebate to anyone who signed up for a contract in the last few hours, but after that, it's closed. But hey, at least they're thinking about $100 Pres, right? Right?

Sorry Sprint, I've got nothin' for you. [AllThingsD]

]]>
http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5354969&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Uh Oh: iPhone OS 3.0 Doesn't Fully Delete Your Emails (UPDATED)]]> The iPhone is no stranger to gaping security flaws, but this one's a doozy: You know how when you delete emails, you expect them to be, well, deleted? On iPhone 3.0, that's just not how things work. This is bad.

You can watch the whole insincere deletion process play out above, but here's a handy guide so you can follow along at home. Turn off your device radio and Wi-Fi connection for maximum OH GOD:

1.) Find a message with a memorable subject line, and delete it.
2.) Go to your trash, and remove the message from there.
3.) Check whatever IMAP folders may be listed on your device—this works with POP too—and make sure your message is really not
there.
4.) Flick over to the main Spotlight search screen, and search for the subject line on that message that shouldn't exist
5.) Be shocked and confused when you find that not only can you see the subject line in a simple search—you can still view the entire message. Your email-based illicit affairs are ruined.

I've tested this, and it works. I even restarted my iPod for good measure, and the message was still in the index, and still accessible by search, despite not appearing anywhere in the main Mail interface. As far as I can tell, there is no way to completely delete emails from iPhone OS 3.0, which isn't just strange, it's a disastrous security flaw.

Still, a few things don't really add up here. The video submitter says he can find emails from months ago, but surely this would result in creeping storage consumption, and has to stop sometime. I mean, doesn't it? And even if these messages are just hiding out in some secret folder or something, and can be deleted by some obscure method, this isn't how a mail client should behave, at all.

Try this yourselves and see if you can find any clues as to what's going on here: I'm as alarmed as I am stumped.

UPDATE: An internal tipster has provided us with proof that Apple is fully aware of this issue and will probably be including a fix in iPhone OS 3.1. Additionally, there are a number of ways to delete the messages from the index—for some, waiting works; for me, even restarting didn't—but the fact remains that deleted emails are left, for some time, fully accessible.

Richard from 148Apps has this workaround, which seems to work fine:

From my messing around with email, the message actually disappears after viewing it a few times. At first I thought the email disappeared after deleting it a few times but I simply viewed the messages about 3 or 4 times and it disappeared.


UPDATE 2
: Also, current 3.1 betas don't seem to suffer from this bug, so yeah, a fix is essentially imminent. [CultOfMac]

]]>
http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5339305&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[World's Fastest Car Wash Has Certain Disadvantages]]> I feel like there's an adage in here somewhere. How about this: If you have to say "oh, but it's just water!" before doing something, then you probably have no business doing it.

On a related note, it's exciting to find out there's another company besides Komatsu that makes trucks this big. Hey, Liebherr, do you have review units?

UPDATE: More on the excavator.—Thanks, GitEmSteveDave!

[Break]

]]>
http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5330533&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Pittsburgh Skyscraper's Famous Morse Code Signal Actually Spells "Pitetsbkrrh"]]> Pittsburgh, PA's 33-story Grant Building famously spells out the name of the city in Morse Code so brightly it can be seen for over 100 miles. Except it doesn't actually spell Pittsburgh, but "Pitetsbkrrh." Eep.

A former HAM radio enthusiast and Pittsburgh local, Tom Stapleton, decoded the message and posted the gaffe on YouTube, and it clearly shows the tower's misspelling. He said he noticed the problem when he casually looked up and saw the signal broadcasting the letter K, which he remembered well as it's the first letter of his sister's name. Too bad "Pittsburgh" doesn't contain the letter K. Representatives of the tower's owners could not say how long the tower had been advertising Pitetsbkrrh. [Pittsburgh Post-Gazette]

]]>
http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5314829&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Are You This Douchebag?]]> Suburbanites need not venture further, since your torpid bodies have grown into your automobiles. City dwellers, this is how you probably look to everyone else, stumbling around with your iPhone.

What's the most embarrassing thing you've done while walking and Twittering about how that stupid barista yelled at you for using your phone at the counter and the coffee isn't really even that great anyway and crapnuggets I ran past the 140 character limit but I need to change the song since I've already heard Kings of Leon today goddammit stupid shuffle? [WGN via Consumerist]

]]>
http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5256735&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[I Dropped My Stupid iPhone and Broke the Stupid Screen]]> Is there a worse moment than when your phone slips as you pull it from your pocket, sending it tumbling towards the sidewalk? Maybe the one when you pick it up and it's fucking broken.

Yeah I broke my screen. It's taken some spills before, but this time it landed right on the corner and got a nasty case of shattered glass on the front. There were a lot of tiny shards that I had to brush off, but it still works. I got a screen cover for it, and it's ugly as sin.

But hey, it's still workable, and with a new model almost definitely coming out on or around July 10th, I'm not about to go buy a new phone right now. So it looks like I'm stuck with this one for about two and a half months. Things could be worse, I guess.

How many of you are dealing with busted-ass phones because of your lack of coordination?

]]>
http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5219765&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[AT&T Says Horrible Terms of Service Update Was All a Big Mistake]]> Millions of voices suddenly cried out in terror, and AT&T swiftly backtracked on the draconian updates to their terms of the service that effectively ban Skype, Sling and other goodness: It's all a big mistake!

The language added on March 30 to AT&T's wireless data service Terms and Conditions was done in error. It was brought to our attention and we have since removed it. We apologize for any inconvenience this may have caused.

Raise your hand if this BS smells like roses to you.

]]>
http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5197758&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[The One Place You Definitely Don't Want To See a Windows Error Message]]> On the control screen of the nuclear power plant in the port of Bushehr, Iran. [UPI]

]]>
http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5171829&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[First Kindle 2 Destroyed, Showing Extended Warranty May Be Worth It]]> One area where dead trees will always beat out eBook readers is chuckability—apparently, the shiny new Kindle 2 doesn't take kindly to being launched into hardwood. Somewhere, Jon Stewart is chuckling.

Rob Bushway had only just taken his Kindle 2 out of the box when he dropped it about three feet onto a solid hardwood floor. The result, as you can see, is a persistent blotch in the upper-right-hand side of the screen. In the spirit of eBook/e-ink evangelism, I feel like we should call this an eStain, or an eFold, but it does pretty much ruin the brand-new device. Luckily for Rob, Amazon Amazon's partner, Service Net Solutions, has (rather tellingly) included provisions for one accidentally destroyed unit in each extended warranty, so he should have a free replacement unit by the end of the week.

Generally speaking, extended warranties are a terrible value. But consider just how easy it looks like it might be to damage this slim new Kindle, $70 to protect $360 doesn't seem like a terrible deal. [Slashgear]

]]>
http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5159989&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Watching the Chicago Bears While Waiting for Your Cruise: That'll Be $28,067 Please]]> Wayne Burdick just wanted to watch the Chicago Bears game. Using the Slingbox he had set up, he slid in his AT&T wireless card. Two and half hours and $28,000 later, the Bears won.

Burdick was just waiting for his cruise ship to arrive, when he decided to watch the game via his Slingbox (which streams television though an internet signal). Having an unlimited data plan, he thought everything would be peachy-keen. Unfortunately, he connected to the ship's network and, as a result, ran up international roaming charges.

When Burdick complained about the charges despite never leaving the country, AT&T offered to initially reduce the bill down to $6,000. Eventually, through some media attention, the bill was reduced to $220 in charges. Oh yeah—the score was 27-23. [Chicago Sun-Times via The Register]

]]>
http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5159858&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Prank of the Year: Comcast Tucson Airs Graphic Porn During Super Bowl (NSFW)]]> Tucson, Arizona was probably not the best place to watch the game last night. Partly because of the disappointing result, but mostly because of the huge, flapping penis.

With under three minutes left and just after Larry Fitzgerald's heroic comeback(ish) touchdown for the Cardinals, the video feed abruptly switched to a scene from stablemate channel Club Jenna, treating viewers to the sight of seemingly omnipresent porn guy Evan Stone swinging his junk around like a maniac. This interlude lasted about 30 seconds.

Comcast told the Arizona Daily Star that engineers have been "working throughout the night" to figure out what happened, but haven't yet come up with an explanation. It could have been a simple case of human error, but given just how wrong it all went, I'd put my money on a disgruntled outgoing employee. Video of the event below, obviously NSFW. [AZStar, image from Getty. —Thanks, Jason and Nic!]

Video courtesy of ComcastSuperBowlPorn.com. WARNING: THIS IS ACTUAL PORN, WITH WIENER

]]>
http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5144199&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Glitch Drops Google Stock Price $200 in Four Minutes, Wiping Out $62 Billion]]> At probably like the worst time ever for your stock to plummet harder than a meteor on a collision course with Bruce Willis, a glitch knocked $200 off of Google's stock price—that's half—in the span of four minutes as the markets were closing today. $62 billion. Erased. In four minutes. The glitch has been fixed, bringing it back to the correct price of $407, but some trades actually did go through at the bargain basement price. While they'll be repealed, it shows you that it's so crazy out there even computers are going nuts right now. [TechCrunch]

]]>
http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5057151&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Bloomberg News Accidentally Publishes Draft of Steve Jobs's Obituary]]> Note to Bloomberg News employees: when you're in the system updating your draft of Steve Jobs's obituary, do NOT press publish. That, though, is exactly what happened late last night, as sleuthed by our buddies over at Gawker. Now, pre-writing obits for prominent figures such as the Steve, in good health and in bad, is totally S.O.P. in the media—so this should not be viewed as yet another non-statement on Jobs's personal health. But unfortunately, we're all going to die (but not all of us will come back more powerful than you can possibly imagine), so reading this and imagining a world without Steve is more an entertaining mind fuck than anything else. And that's just for us—imagine what it must be like to read your own obituary. Read on for an excerpt, with more over at Gawker.

I imagine they're ducking eye-laser beams over in the Bloomberg newsroom, being volleyed all the way from Cupertino. More at: [Gawker]

]]>
http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5042929&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Question of the Day: What's Your Most Expensive, Dumbest Gadget Oops?]]> To many of us, our gadgets are like our babies: we bring them everywhere, they're expensive, and we would go to great lengths to protect them. But just like babies, sometimes gadgets get dropped. The results are often tragic, and the guilt crippling. Maybe you haven't drenched your new $1600 keyboard in coffee, but have you accidentally plunked your BlackBerry in a urinal? Put your iPod through the wash? Has your adorable puppy destroyed your new laptop in a territorial gesture? What's your worst, your most embarrassing, your most expensive or just your most ridiculous "oh, shit" gadget moment?

]]>
http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5032270&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Amazon Knows Something About My Wife That I Sure Don't]]> My wife—who has never browsed for power tools in her life—was greeted with this page on Amazon this morning. So does a store know my wife's hobbies and interests better than I do? Meh, wouldn't be the first time. Won't be the last.

]]>
http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5020725&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[We Can't Wait for the New iPhone G3]]> "It's even faster than the old iPhone G3."

Found on Time. Think you can do better? You probably can. Hit the comments and give it your best shot. [Time via BGR]

]]>
http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5018644&view=rss&microfeed=true