This looks really cool, but my issue is that it only applies to a very niche market - netbooking.
See, I do a lot of heavy statistical programing - Stata, for example. First of all, a Chrome OS would unlikely support a RAM-hog such as Stata. However, if it did, I wouldn't be too comfortable doing all my work on a cloud, especially when I'm working with very sensitive data sets. Nor am I too happy about simply keeping the data on an SD card or flash drive, where it could more easily fall out and be lost.
Unless I never want to do anything other than blogging, email, youtube, and LOLcats, I don't think Chrome OS makes a whole lot of sense for the entire market. As Walt Mosspuppet said: "Saying nobody needs more than webapps is like saying nobody needs a fridge because we can all drive down to TGI-goddamn-Friday's for chicken wings."
@themightyspitz: They said during the liveblog that it was to be a "companion computer". So you wouldn't have only ChromeOS, you'd have 2 computers (or dual boot?), but you might use Chrome 99% of the time, depending on your needs. Since it's lightweight, and what most people do happens on the internet, it does make sense.
The whole OS is built around several things I'm just not comfortable with yet. Cloud storage, web applications, and if it's using data for everything-won't that chew up bandwidth like the dickens?
@otko: On the bandwidth issue...maybe, then again maybe not. Currently topping the lists of web apps that eat up bandwidth are notably not GoogleDocs, not Calendar applicatons, not Chess. You'd certainly be using up more bandwidth than loading up the app on your local computer, however that amount may be negligible compared to the overwhelming tide of video data that ISPs already have to contend with.
Think of it this way: does having millions of Gmail and Facebook users eat up tons of bandwidth? Perhaps. Do we have more than enough bandwidth to cover it? In most areas, probably.
This could save the desktop market...if you could have a laptop that synchs to the cloud and have the desktop synch also...man the possibilities are endless.
@Nathan Obbards: Same here, any product that could end up in the same data-loss brickitude as the Sidekick (as slim as those chances may be) is definately not on my shopping list.
@Skunky: That's every product currently made. If you're using your laptop with any other OS, the harddrive could fail, making the exact same thing happen(but with a much greater chance of actually happening)
@MarcusMaximus: I'd say the likelihood of having network problems is far higher than your hard drive or other crucial component suddenly dropping dead. Even with a robust router and high speed internet, I often see some big glitches because of Optimum Online doing service on the lines, or having service interruptions.
@Kaiser-Machead: Agreed, if possible, I'll be compiling this and installing it tonight, though the mention of custom firmware makes me a bit iffy on whether that's possible. I'm not sure what the implication is supposed to be there but it sounds like it can only run on specific chrome os machines.
@Skunky: +5Up to that! (although I think the lesson has been learned on that one, there's still the possibility for a mass data outage, which would affect people who need their computers for work. And, *gasp* how can I watch Hulu in that situation?)
@MarcusMaximus: I'm curious as to whether or not this can be achieved in a VM. If so that'd be awesome since I have both Parallels and VMware Fusion to play with.
UPDATE: well according to the liveblog, I'd have to buy a Chrome OS machine...whatever the heck that is.
This better make said device significantly cheaper.
@MarcusMaximus: You are certainly correct, but at the same time, _I'M_ the one in control over how bad the dataloss will be. I should backup important (or nostalgic) data on other HDD's and/or optical media. But with the Sidekicks there was no "local backup" option for ones own personal data and so when the whole thing went kerblooie, all users were totally screwed.
The cloud thing isn't a bad idea, i'm not saying that, but I don't think it's the best solution for non-business users.
Now if it gets a WoW port, that might be different, but now I'm just being silly.
Wait, why not format the windows partition as FAT32? I'd like to drag & drop files from my mac side to my PC side – NTFS doesn't allow that, right? #bootcamp
@Nick Sweet: You can if you want, but you'd be limited to a 32GB capacity partition. NTFS allows you to split the hard drive directly in half if you actually plan to do quite a bit with Windows. #bootcamp
For an alternate, VirtualBox has had guest additions for Windows 7 for a while now. I have been running the RC for a while with no issues, about to make a build for the full release.
@jerNELS: Exactly, not to mention that if you do any stuff with Adobe's Creative suite, the Windows versions are drastically superior in their 64-bit Windows releases. Considering how much I have to do that, it's good to have an option to switch to. #bootcamp
Or just wait a month or two. I just read that Apple is planning on releasing a Boot Camp update before the end of the year. [support.apple.com]#bootcamp
@mullingitover: Speed, fit, and finish... Plus Adobe can finally put all that Cocoa code to use they wrote years ago.
@Dillinger23: You see that crap about how long the cycle is to take advantage of GPGPU? :( That better just be a load of crap, I'm sick of my GPU being only good for crunching WU's ;)
11/19/09
See, I do a lot of heavy statistical programing - Stata, for example. First of all, a Chrome OS would unlikely support a RAM-hog such as Stata. However, if it did, I wouldn't be too comfortable doing all my work on a cloud, especially when I'm working with very sensitive data sets. Nor am I too happy about simply keeping the data on an SD card or flash drive, where it could more easily fall out and be lost.
Unless I never want to do anything other than blogging, email, youtube, and LOLcats, I don't think Chrome OS makes a whole lot of sense for the entire market. As Walt Mosspuppet said: "Saying nobody needs more than webapps is like saying nobody needs a fridge because we can all drive down to TGI-goddamn-Friday's for chicken wings."
11/19/09
11/19/09
11/19/09
11/19/09
Think of it this way: does having millions of Gmail and Facebook users eat up tons of bandwidth? Perhaps. Do we have more than enough bandwidth to cover it? In most areas, probably.
11/19/09
11/19/09
11/19/09
''In Chrome OS, every application is a web application.''
''ALL data in Chrome OS is in the cloud.''
My biggest fear has been confirmed. No Chrome OS for me.
11/19/09
yeah i mean, cloud computing kinda means that your OS is just a glorified web browser.
no chrome for me either.
11/19/09
11/19/09
11/19/09
11/19/09
11/19/09
11/19/09
In any case, I'm going to have to give this a whirl to see how it functions.
11/19/09
Or really, having it all sitting somewhere in Google's massive memory vaults.
I don't know which is scarier.
11/19/09
11/19/09
11/19/09
UPDATE: well according to the liveblog, I'd have to buy a Chrome OS machine...whatever the heck that is.
This better make said device significantly cheaper.
11/19/09
The cloud thing isn't a bad idea, i'm not saying that, but I don't think it's the best solution for non-business users.
Now if it gets a WoW port, that might be different, but now I'm just being silly.
10/22/09
10/22/09
10/22/09
10/22/09
thanks folk #bootcamp
10/22/09
10/22/09
10/22/09
10/22/09
10/22/09
10/22/09
Semper Fi. #bootcamp
10/22/09
10/22/09
10/22/09
(I know Snow Leopard boasted "upgrade only" but it was actually the full OS, and I want to know if this is the same case)
Anyone know for sure? Thanks! #bootcamp
10/22/09
10/22/09
08/20/09
08/20/09
Actually, since it's an Apple rumor, I'll take it with a salt lick. Still waiting on that Yellow Submarine iPod, people...
08/20/09
08/20/09
08/20/09
@Dillinger23: You see that crap about how long the cycle is to take advantage of GPGPU? :( That better just be a load of crap, I'm sick of my GPU being only good for crunching WU's ;)