<![CDATA[Gizmodo: OS X Leopard]]> http://cache.gawker.com/assets/base/img/thumbs140x140/gizmodo.com.png <![CDATA[Gizmodo: OS X Leopard]]> http://gizmodo.com/tag/os x leopard http://gizmodo.com/tag/os x leopard <![CDATA[ Windows on Mac Benchmarked: Boot Camp vs. Parallels vs. Fusion ]]> The three methods for running Windows on a Mac (Boot Camp, Parallels and Fusion) have been around for a while, but Mactech's numbers seem to be the first we've seen on how the three stack up on Leopard. The results weren't that surprising.

Boot Camp won out for overall speed, where Parallels won for virtualization (running Windows at the same time as Macs) performance. VMWare Fusion, on the other hand, "wins" by keeping your OS X and Window environments separate, which isn't really a feature but more of a lack of a feature—Parallels does a much better and faster job cross-integrating applications and documents. But if you're into keeping up the wall between the two operating systems, there's an option for you. [MacTech]

]]>
Fri, 21 Dec 2007 14:36:34 EST Jason Chen http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=336878&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Leopard 10.5.1 Update Coming, Here's The List of Fixes ]]> It looks like the 10.5.1 update has just hit, bringing with it fixes to Airport, Disk Utility, iCal, Mail, Printing, Security, Finder, and Time Machine. The big fixes that we can see are the finder network data loss problem that was reported last week, re-wording the firewall to reflect what it really does, fixing a read-only network share issue, and improving Back to My Mac functionality. Big list of changes after the jump.

AirPort

* Allows password-protected accounts on AirPort Disks to show up on in the Finder's Shared Sidebar.
* Resolves an issue with saved passwords for wireless networks.

Back to My Mac

* Improves the reliability of Back to My Mac-enabled Macs appearing in the Finder's Shared Sidebar.
* Improves compatibility with D-Link NAT gateways.

Disk utilities

* Restores the functionality of the progress bar during permission repairs in Disk Utility.
* Addresses an issue that could produce an alert when creating disk images using Disk Utility or Terminal.
* Improves disk partitioning when multiple RAID sets are created on the same disk.

iCal

* iCal alarms are now more reliably delivered via email.
* Resolves an issue when inviting attendees via a CalDAV account.

Mail

* Improves stability when resizing columns in the message viewer or switching between Stationery templates in email messages.
* Addresses an issue in which attachments enclosed inside an HTML link may not be clickable in email messages.
* Fixes an issue with email accounts added using the "Simple Setup" feature in which messages cannot be sent due to an SMTP connection failure.
* Improves Smart Mailboxes compatibility with .Mac Sync, and addresses an issue with To Do's disappearing when using Smart Mailboxes.
* Resolves an issue with syncing Mail accounts with .Mac in which multiple On My Mac folders appear in the Mailbox pane.

Networking

* Addresses an issue in which Microsoft Windows shared folders may be read-only when connected via SMB.

Printing

* Resolves an issue in which user-selected values on Paper Feed PDE are reset to default while saving a custom preset.

Security, Firewall

* Addresses a code signing issue; third-party applications can now run when included in the Application Firewall or when whitelisted in Parental Controls.
* In Security preferences' Firewall tab, the "Block All" option is now called "Allow Only essential services"
* Includes recent Apple security updates.

System and Finder

* Addresses a potential data loss issue when moving files across partitions in the Finder.
* Resolves an issue with login after turning off FileVault for a specific user account.
* Improves compatibility with Adobe Flash-based uploaders used by .Mac Web Gallery and certain other websites and applications.
* Resolves a potential text drawing issue with certain Adobe Flash-based websites and applications.

Time Machine

* Addresses formatting issues with certain drives used with Time Machine (specifically, single-partition MBR drives greater than 512 GB in size as well as NTFS drives of any size and partition scheme).
* Resolves an issue in which files restored in Time Machine may be restored to the backup hierarchy rather than the folders to which they belong.

]]>
Thu, 15 Nov 2007 14:01:34 EST Jason Chen http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=323268&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Time Machine Flux Capacitor Patch Lets You Back Up to Any Drive in Leopard ]]> flux.jpgApple's limitation on what kind of drives (directly attached drives) can be used as a Leopard Time Machine backup disk can be overcome with a small command line utility.

All it does is make Leopard show unsupported drives as a supported drive for Time Machine, but Apple most likely removed support for these drives for reasons such as data loss or data corruption, so be careful if you're going to try this. Just head on over to 9to5Mac and download their aptly named Flux Capacitor automator script and you'll be on your way to network backups in no time. Or, you can just wait for Apple's official release that's sure to come soon. [9to5Mac via MacRumors]

]]>
Thu, 08 Nov 2007 17:25:00 EST Jason Chen http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=320664&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Two Possible Mac Data Loss Issues Still Unadressed by Apple ]]> leopardbsodicon2.jpgAlthough no official word has been released by Apple, there appears to be two serious data loss issues that could affect MacBook owners and users of Mac OS X Leopard. According to blogger Tom Karpik, Leopard's Finder has a bug in its directory-moving code that can result in massive data loss when transferring large files—regardless of the type of destination drive. Apparently, this flaw has been around since the days of Mac OS X 10.3 Panther, so it could represent an ongoing problem that Apple has failed to address.

The other issue involves a flaw in certain 2.5-inch Segate SATA drives with a firmware version 7.01. As mentioned last week on Giz, the flaw causes read/write heads to fail and scratch up the drive. Again, these issues are not official, but you may want to take steps to back up your data just to be on the safe side. [TomKarpik via AppleInsider]

]]>
Tue, 06 Nov 2007 17:20:29 EST Sean Fallon http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=319645&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Micro Center Gives $40 Rebate on Leopard OS X ]]> LeopardOSX40.jpgIf you are yet to take the plunge to Leopard OS X, perhaps Micro Center's excellent $40 rebate on all Leopard OS X purchases shall convince you?

That's right, until 11/11 all qualifying purchasers will be able to claim a $40 mail-in rebate, the application form is available for download on Micro Center's website. Hit the link to save yourself some bills on your next big cat. [Micro Center via Zats Not Funny]

]]>
Sun, 04 Nov 2007 12:30:00 EST Haroon Malik http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=318651&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Apple Hasn't Given Up on Time Machine AirPort Disk Support ]]> If you kept up with our Mac OSX Leopard Liveblog, you might have heard that Apple pulled wireless Time Machine back-ups with AirPort disks at the last minute. If you were irritated by this development, good news may be on the horizon. According to an Appleinsider source, Apple is classifying the AirPort disk issue as a known issue. So if the rumors are true, engineers are looking into it and an upcoming maintenance update resolving the problem may be well on its way. [Appleinsider]

]]>
Wed, 31 Oct 2007 18:20:50 EDT Sean Fallon http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=317487&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Surprise, Leopard's Got Security Flaws ]]> leopardbsodicon.jpgWe've already covered a couple of Leopard's uh-ohs and their fixes, but researchers have kicked up the dirt to reveal a few security-related flaws. First, according to Jürgen Schmidt, editor in chief at Heise Security, if you enable Leopard's firewall (it's disabled by default) and set it to "block all incoming connections," some internal system services are still allowed access from the internet, making it a mite porous. And according to Thomas Ptacek from Matasano Security, two of its security features—sandboxing and library randomization—are half-baked in execution.

The problem with its implementation of sandboxing—where an app is placed in a "sandbox" so it can't get rough with the rest of the OS if it's hacked—is that a lot of the most commonly hacked apps like the browser, mail client and IM app aren't run in a sandbox. To top it off, the sandbox walls aren't as thorough as they should be, mostly applying to network access. Library randomization has similar problems—it wasn't implemented everywhere it should have been, like the Dynamic Link Library, according to Ptacek.

Of course, someone has to actually exploit the flaws—incompletions more so than outright screw-ups—to cause damage, but Apple should probably patch them up with some haste, particularly the leaky firewall issue. [Cnet, Mac World]

]]>
Wed, 31 Oct 2007 02:15:20 EDT Matt Buchanan http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=317076&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Fry's has $10 off Leopard today for anybody ... ]]> Fry's has $10 off Leopard today for anybody who's not keen on getting their $10 from Amazon. Pick it up at 6PM and you get to bypass the lines at Apple stores. [Fry's]

]]>
Fri, 26 Oct 2007 19:37:59 EDT Jason Chen http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=315798&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ OS X Leopard Video Walk-through ]]> Apple's just posted an OS X Leopard walk-through video that's in the same vein as those iPhone and iPod Touch walk-through videos you've seen before. A guy narrates and describes new features while he shows them to you on the monitor—except in this case, he's less robotic (iPhone guy) or goofy (iPod touch guy). In fact, we think we've seen him before. Does he work in the SF Apple store? [Apple]

]]>
Fri, 19 Oct 2007 12:52:04 EDT Jason Chen http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=312936&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ There's no gold master of OS X Leopard yet, ... ]]> There's no gold master of OS X Leopard yet, but Apple sources does say there's an internal GM release candidate, which means the final should be done very soon. Looks like an October ship date is still on. [MacRumors]

]]>
Fri, 12 Oct 2007 14:59:33 EDT Jason Chen http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=310359&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Speculation Smashed: No ZFS in Leopard ]]> There was a reason ZFS wasn't named-checked as one of Leopard's 10 (not so) new features at WWDC 07—despite declarations by Sun's CEO, Jonathan Schwartz, yesterday Apple denied ZFS's presence in Leopard. Put another way by Brian Croll, senior director of product marketing for OS X: "ZFS is not happening." Ouch.

But if you read into it and consider InfoWeek's note, "upon further questioning, Croll would only confirm that Apple had never said ZFS would be a part of Leopard," in conjunction with the fact that it was Sun's CEO making the slip, not some random peon, it seems fairly likely that something Sunny was cooking in the Apple kitchen. It's not like they're down and out in any case—Apple's probably already kicking around stuff for 10.6

Apple Says No Sun File System For Leopard [InformationWeek]

[Updated]

"ZFS is not the default file system for Leopard. We are exploring it as a file system option for high-end storage systems with really large storage. As a result, we have included ZFS — a read-only copy of ZFS — in Leopard."
]]>
Tue, 12 Jun 2007 14:15:08 EDT Matt Buchanan http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=268131&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Windows Vista vs. Mac OS X Leopard: Upgrade Hell or One-Stop Shopping ]]> Here's a fine piece of propaganda from the fanboys at MacHouse. Ha ha. But they fail to mention that first of all, Leopard isn't available yet, and second, Apple will charge you for each point upgrade of OS X, and you only have to buy Windows once every five years.

Windows Vista and Mac OS X Leopard Upgrade Charts [Mac House, via CrunchGear]

]]>
Fri, 02 Feb 2007 14:55:00 EST Charlie White http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=233540&view=rss&microfeed=true