At the University of New Hampshire, we make a good amount of our power from methane taken from the trash dump, and doo-doo. It's not an uncommon thing.
@Con Seannery '09: Illegal in 1 Giz: It is public transportation, so they will just raise all of our taxes to cover the cost. It is in Norway, so citizens will likely be paying 110% of their salary in taxes.
@Justin Culmo: Methane is far more dangerous for trapping energy than CO2, however CO2 is far more prevalent in the atmosphere since nearly everything we do creates it. Still, if we are all going to be taking dumps anyway, we might as well use that energy for a good purpose.
On a slightly unrelated note, why is it that we call it "take a dump"? Is it because we are taking the "dump" out of our body, or is there more to this phrase that I do not understand?
@Monty: Fortunately, global warming is not man-made and we are simply in an 800 year warming cycle. This has happened before, we know it as fact, this same thing happened in the early 1200s. This is just the first time we've had modern science, and, more importantly, modern enviromentalists to go along with it.
@ɟɹnsǝɥʇɥdɹnɯ: First, you should get a star next to your name for mentioning our supreme leader, Beavis. A second start should be added for the impressive upside-down name. We are not worthy.
I hate to bite on such a tangent, but I must. It is certainly true that our planet goes through warming and cooling cycles which we never truly exit from, so your comment has truthiness to it. However, scientists can (and have) shown the likely cause for cooling and warming in each of those periods. It is not just a natural part of life on Earth - there are real reasons why these things happen.
That that in mind, what is the reason for the current warming trend? That is where things get tricky for folks that believe humans are not responsible since you have to then find the source. Fortunately, we have thousands of scientists that study exactly that, and they all publish reports on the subject. Here is one from 2007:
If we believe the thousands of scientists behind the report and the evidence they site is not a giant conspiracy theory, climate change appears to be happening and humans, according to them, are likely the leading contributor, and the evidence gets stronger for it as more studies are published. (There are newer studies, which I can give you links to if you want to read them.) For that reason, I tend to discredit anything published before 2006 as out of date, scientifically speaking. I also tend to discredit anything published by a single person since there are plenty of scientists that can band together if evidence presents a different opinion.
So, with that in mind, I would love to see your scientific evidence of what is actually causing climate change.
@Monty: Thanks for the kind words! If you could go ahead and forward those to the Giz Overlords in outline form with proper documentation in reference to getting a star, yeah, that would be greeeaaat.... I'm going to need you to go ahead and come in on Sunday too...
@Con Seannery '09: Illegal in 1 Giz: Omg... Enough with the anti-facebooker comments dude. You're not going to get rid of Facebookers on Gizmodo, got it?
While I do support an audition process for Facebookers, I don't support this guy's constant hatred towards every Facebooker on the site.
PS: Thanks Jesus Diaz for keeping the site clean. I, along with all my other friends and family who go to Gizmodo and Lifehacker daily admit the main reason we're dedicated fans of Giz is because of the lack of YouTube-ish comments.
@SJRNWT: Did I say anywhere in the past week or so that I wanted them all removed? Did I say anywhere in the past week or so that I wanted an outright ban on them? Fuck, son. Do your homework before you go and call people out.
@SJRNWT: Con's changed his Anti opinion. He's said he will settle for auditions. We all know they are here to stay, and I think most of the "Anti-Facebook" crowd have switched as well to a "auditioned" stance.
@Con Seannery '09: Illegal in 1 Giz: I think it's not so much your comments, as the little anti-FB symbol in your avatar. That's probably where he sees your sentiments stemming from even if you have been nice to the FBer's in the last week...
hehe must say they love the number 80. Last year they introduced 80 bio-ethanol busses. Hope there won't be any smelly side-effects since I live in a street where many of these busses will drive across..
I've always felt that city buses smelled like ass as they breezed on by... (As opposed to stale urine when you're on them...)This now makes so much more sense.
04/17/09
04/17/09
04/17/09
04/17/09
04/17/09
04/17/09
When a project is this brown, does it still count as green?
04/17/09
04/17/09
04/17/09
04/17/09
04/17/09
On a slightly unrelated note, why is it that we call it "take a dump"? Is it because we are taking the "dump" out of our body, or is there more to this phrase that I do not understand?
04/17/09
04/17/09
04/17/09
04/17/09
04/17/09
I hate to bite on such a tangent, but I must. It is certainly true that our planet goes through warming and cooling cycles which we never truly exit from, so your comment has truthiness to it. However, scientists can (and have) shown the likely cause for cooling and warming in each of those periods. It is not just a natural part of life on Earth - there are real reasons why these things happen.
That that in mind, what is the reason for the current warming trend? That is where things get tricky for folks that believe humans are not responsible since you have to then find the source. Fortunately, we have thousands of scientists that study exactly that, and they all publish reports on the subject. Here is one from 2007:
[www.ipcc.ch]
If we believe the thousands of scientists behind the report and the evidence they site is not a giant conspiracy theory, climate change appears to be happening and humans, according to them, are likely the leading contributor, and the evidence gets stronger for it as more studies are published. (There are newer studies, which I can give you links to if you want to read them.) For that reason, I tend to discredit anything published before 2006 as out of date, scientifically speaking. I also tend to discredit anything published by a single person since there are plenty of scientists that can band together if evidence presents a different opinion.
So, with that in mind, I would love to see your scientific evidence of what is actually causing climate change.
Thank you.
04/17/09
04/17/09
04/17/09
04/17/09
04/17/09
Rider: I ain't payin sh##.
04/17/09
04/17/09
04/17/09
04/17/09
04/17/09
04/17/09
04/17/09
04/17/09
04/17/09
While I do support an audition process for Facebookers, I don't support this guy's constant hatred towards every Facebooker on the site.
PS: Thanks Jesus Diaz for keeping the site clean. I, along with all my other friends and family who go to Gizmodo and Lifehacker daily admit the main reason we're dedicated fans of Giz is because of the lack of YouTube-ish comments.
04/17/09
04/17/09
04/17/09
04/17/09
04/17/09
04/17/09
04/17/09
04/17/09
02/05/09
02/05/09
02/05/09
02/05/09
02/05/09
02/05/09
02/05/09
02/05/09
02/05/09
02/05/09
02/05/09
02/05/09
02/05/09