Enter your username and password.
-
posts about #palmbeware more →
Apple's Bloodiest Patent and Copyright Clashes
| posts about #palmbeware more → |
Apple's Bloodiest Patent and Copyright Clashes |
01/29/09
01/29/09
01/29/09
*tee hee hee*
01/29/09
01/29/09
Apple didn't have to change the iPod software one bit, and lost absolutely no competitive advantage. Total win for Apple.
01/29/09
01/29/09
01/29/09
01/29/09
01/29/09
they use different technology to detect the fingers on the screen, and only one of them is a phone
01/29/09
01/29/09
Apple, Inc.'s defense was that it wasn't producing music. It asserted this defense at the same time that Apple, Inc. was selling iTunes Exclusives and iTunes Sessions recordings - recordings made exclusively for iTunes.
Of course, Sir Paul did manage to smack down Heather Mills in his divorce with her. That's gotta count for something.
01/29/09
01/29/09
A stitch in time saves nine.
01/29/09
[topics.law.cornell.edu]
"Under current law, works are covered whether or not a copyright notice is attached and whether or not the work is registered."
01/29/09
01/29/09
In that type of situation you would probably walk away with your stick still in hand.
01/29/09
01/29/09
01/29/09
01/29/09
01/29/09
01/29/09
I'm all for companies protecting their IP, but sometimes it seems as though it would do a great deal of ill for the industry if certain things were hoarded away. Besides, multitouch itself is not an Apple invention. I hope other businesses get to use and exploit this feature, because handsets are coming in with fewer and fewer buttons, so really do need the more elaborate virtual controls. /fin
01/29/09
01/29/09
01/29/09
01/29/09
So they were fighting over this for 14 years? Wow.