i was just thinking how we didn't have enough mobile OSes out there! thanks so much for adding to the fold! what are there, like only 6 major ones plus a couple more minor ones out for us already?
yeah, good luck trying to break into that. the mobile space is a harder nut to crack than lance armstrong's missing testicle.
with all that being said, man, those specs look tasty. and that's where the similarity to lance armstrong's missing testicles ends. maybe.
@Jonathan Moll: From Sprint's press release: "The Palm Pre phone will be available from Sprint on June 6 for $199.99 after a $100 mail-in rebate with a new two-year service agreement on an Everything Data plan or Business Essentials with Messaging and Data plan."
So now everyone in the Palm Fiefdom not working on the Pre pretty much feels like a second class serf that can be tarred, feathered, and sued by their more regal colleagues.
Oh, nuts. The Centro was the only smartphone that ever appealed to me, and that's precisely because I liked my Visor and my Tungsten E3 so much. I was looking forward to an easy transfer of data.
Well, I'll just keep using the Tungsten and my plain vanilla Samsung phone.
I loved the Palm OS, and I had tons of apps that did virtually everything. It was a very clever, simple and powerful system. Unfortunately, PDAs lost traction with the advent of smartphones. I think it's great that Palm is moving forward with their Web OS on the Pre, and I hope it brings some healthy competition, along with Android.
Y'all continue to ignore the simple detail that before the handhelds from Palm, phones were for making phone calls. If you have a device that holds documents, contacts, calendar, and a host of other aps, and you call it a smartphone, you owe it to the Palm timeline.
@PaddyDugan: Well said. Palm defined the PDA. The applications added to cellphones were practically built on Palm DNA.
Although Apple made an early debut with the Newton, it was an total flop. Too big, not versatile enough and hardly accessible for programmers to develop applications for.
@nchatch: the whole concept for this article is weak, actually, and shows a complete lack of understanding of history and misses the opportunity for meaningful analysis.
Adrian; you forget (or maybe you're just too young to remember) that Palm practically invented the smartphone category. And that was after they defined the PDA category. From the early days of Palm OS the Treo 180, Palm (Handspring) was at the forefront of the development of the smart phone. And in those days, the smart phone pretty much meant the combination of a PDA with phone functionality, since there really wasn't mobile data to speak of. Then the Treo 600 came on the scene and it was pretty much the first smart phone blockbuster. It was the device to have at the time, and it was very good at what it did. Microsoft didn't really catch up until years later. And Blackberry? At the time Blackberry device was just starting to introduce phone features - and you couldn't even hold it up to your head and use it like a phone, you had to use a headset or it wouldn't work.
The Treo 600 was sadly Palm's pinnacle, and it was downhill for the company from there as the company went through a couple of stupid transitions and kept pumping out the same hardware, letting their new OS development languish. And while Palm was distracted other companies were eating Palm's lunch.
Yes, the Palm OS 5 ultimately doesn't stand up to today's standards, especially when it comes to multimedia and internet applications, but as we give it final rights, let's not forget what the OS has done. We shouldn't minimize its contribution to computing, especially to smart phones.
10/23/09
10/23/09
seriously bricklike
It is smaller than the iPhone. #elseintuition
10/23/09
Nothing to do with size, everything to do with being a brickish slab. #elseintuition
10/23/09
10/23/09
10/23/09
Radial interface!
Genius!
Not so sure about the whole 'holistic' thing though... #elseintuition
10/28/09
10/28/09
But that's just me...
And hey, maybe the phone has magic healing powers, too! #elseintuition
10/23/09
10/23/09
yeah, good luck trying to break into that. the mobile space is a harder nut to crack than lance armstrong's missing testicle.
with all that being said, man, those specs look tasty. and that's where the similarity to lance armstrong's missing testicles ends. maybe.
10/23/09
Also, google "neuticles". I have a feeling you will enjoy it. #elseintuition
10/23/09
05/24/09
Please update the FAQ!
05/24/09
03/28/09
Just shows you how screwey they really are.
Just hold on tight for this Pre stuff. because I'm sure this isn't the end of it.
03/28/09
02/12/09
Sorry, M130. I should never have given you away....
02/11/09
Well, I'll just keep using the Tungsten and my plain vanilla Samsung phone.
02/11/09
I've had my tome.
02/11/09
Sorry.
02/11/09
02/11/09
02/11/09
Although Apple made an early debut with the Newton, it was an total flop. Too big, not versatile enough and hardly accessible for programmers to develop applications for.
02/11/09
02/12/09
Adrian; you forget (or maybe you're just too young to remember) that Palm practically invented the smartphone category. And that was after they defined the PDA category. From the early days of Palm OS the Treo 180, Palm (Handspring) was at the forefront of the development of the smart phone. And in those days, the smart phone pretty much meant the combination of a PDA with phone functionality, since there really wasn't mobile data to speak of. Then the Treo 600 came on the scene and it was pretty much the first smart phone blockbuster. It was the device to have at the time, and it was very good at what it did. Microsoft didn't really catch up until years later. And Blackberry? At the time Blackberry device was just starting to introduce phone features - and you couldn't even hold it up to your head and use it like a phone, you had to use a headset or it wouldn't work.
The Treo 600 was sadly Palm's pinnacle, and it was downhill for the company from there as the company went through a couple of stupid transitions and kept pumping out the same hardware, letting their new OS development languish. And while Palm was distracted other companies were eating Palm's lunch.
Yes, the Palm OS 5 ultimately doesn't stand up to today's standards, especially when it comes to multimedia and internet applications, but as we give it final rights, let's not forget what the OS has done. We shouldn't minimize its contribution to computing, especially to smart phones.