Gizmodo 
Enter your username and password.
Tip your editors:
tips@gizmodo.com
Editorial Director:
Brian Lam | Email | Twitter
Editor:
Jason Chen
Email | AIM | Twitter
Features Editor:
Wilson Rothman
Email | Twitter
Senior Contributing Editor:
Jesus Diaz
Email | AIM | Twitter
Mark Wilson, Reviews
Email | AIM | Twitter
Contributing Editors:
Matt Buchanan
Email | AIM | Twitter
Adam Frucci
Email | Twitter
Sean Fallon
Email | Twitter
Jack Loftus
Email | Twitter
John Herrman
Email | Twitter
Dan Nosowitz
Email
Chris Mascari
Email
Danny Allen
Email | Twitter
Columnist:
Brendan I. Koerner
Interns:
Don Nguyen
Email
Chris Jacob
Email
Comment Intern:
Nick Ellenoff | Email
Comment Account Questions:
Comments@gizmodo.com
Original material is licensed under a Creative Commons License permitting non-commercial sharing with attribution.
11/02/09
11/02/09
11/02/09
The watercooling isn't anything special and you can get a similar corsair watercooling system for less than $70. #maingear
11/02/09
Times are a' changin' indeed. #maingear
11/02/09
11/02/09
If i wanted a pre-built a desktop I'd buy a mac. #maingear
11/02/09
11/02/09
This is the modern-day equivalent of going to your parents and asking for a pony and getting a rocking horse. They'll jokingly consider it until they see how much it really costs and after picking their jaws up off the floor go get a PC-in-a-box from best buy.
Impressive? Yes. Cost effective? Not so much. #maingear
05/11/09
My MacBook Pro always get hot, I nearly can cook eggs and sausage on it.
05/11/09
05/11/09
05/11/09
05/11/09
04/27/09
04/27/09
04/27/09
Rating HW from 1-10 and having the game list the requisite rating is not very "future-compatible". For instance, when released, the Geforce 9800 GTX would have been a 9, but now it would probably rank a 7.
04/27/09
04/27/09
Obviously, the game developers win with hardware spec-standardization. Furthermore, there is a point at which technical specifications will not improve games by that much. However, have we reached that point yet? If not, would this movement eventually result in customizable PCs being replaced with more versatile versions of video game consoles?
I'm still pondering, hence the rambling.
04/27/09
Can it play Doom? It might be a toaster.
Can it play Crysis? You could use it as a toaster when gaming.
Although, after reading the Kotaku article, wouldn't a little disclosure on the Futuremark scores required of a game, and the scores of various hardware configurations be sufficient?
On second though, this is far less complicated than it appears.
04/27/09
the composite benchmarks, like futuremark, don't really reflect a good measure of how a computer will run any game in question.
This is something that sites like Anandtech and THG and others have been fighting for a LONG time. . . if there were such a thing, their jobs would become MUCH easier.
do a search at either site for developing benchmarks and you'll get a great discussion about how complex it really is to come up with something that a: works, b: works across multiple GPUs and CPUs, etc. and c: works consistently across multiple games, drivers, etc.
04/27/09
Unlike the console world, which targets an exact hardware specification, the PC gaming community does not. Sounds to me like that situation is as easy to fix as developing for a predetermined system.
I don't feel sorry for game developers, who through their willingness to create utterly wanktastic visuals, render(pun intended) their games unplayable by vast portions of their target market. But, then again, I'm an Ubuntu user not a gamer.
It's really not that hard to predict gaming performance from those benchmarks. All that's needed is a common frame of reference(a baseline system), and some understanding of the points at which said game is GPU or CPU dependent. It's all about setting targets, and hitting them.
04/27/09
04/27/09
market's been on an upswing since january.
04/27/09
Next year's economy growth is expected to be 0%. So, if by upswing you mean we won't contract any further, you'd be correct.
04/27/09
04/27/09
The "Market" as a generic term is typically used in reference to the DOW Jones Industrial Average, which has been on a general up-swing since January.
The DOW Jones does not specifically take into account the overall expansion or contraction of the GDP, nor does it take into account month to month joblessness numbers. The DOW Jones is none-the-less considered to be the key indicator, and it's general trend over time will typically forecast the trends subsequently observed in other indicators.
In closing I would just like to mention that I know full well that I am being a pedantic jackass, I just wanted to make sure that you knew you were too. ;)
04/27/09
"will it blend?"
errr. I mean:
"will it play crysis."
seems worth while, but i didn't know there was a big issue with folks buying games and not reading the system requirements that are printed on the box. seems pretty standard to know if something will or not blend.
04/27/09
So a simple game will require a machine that can run 0.5 Cryses.
But a very complex, graphics intensive game would require a machine that can run 2.75 Cryses.
04/27/09
04/27/09
Not to mention the quality of the graphics that the PC is capable of producing, at higher resolution, than the console?
No thanks.
04/27/09
03/24/09
Now they want to take the rendering and move it from the client to the server. Okay, that's not a bad idea, it allows for very thin clients. This is the general premise behind web-based applications such as Salesforce.com etc. However, there are two problems that need to be addressed for this to work.
1. Rendering: Currently if 20 people are playing a game that means there are 20 videos being rendered. In order for this to work a "server cloud" would have to have the power of 20 high end video cards along with the CPU and RAM to manage all the variables. Now multiply that by the number of people playing at any one time. Now clean the brain matter off your screen from your head exploding.
2. Bandwidth: Now you are not only sending a data stream back and forth, but fully rendered HD video. The amount of bandwidth used for one 20 player game that lasts 30 minutes would be tremendous on both the server and client side. And with several major ISPs (Time Warner anyone) setting bandwidth caps you could blow through that in one game.
This is an interesting idea and will make an excellent proof-of-concept, but I simply can't imagine it is ready for prime time or will be anytime soon. Not only do I think the tech is not there, but only people who buy more than say a dozen games a year will be willing to pay for it. I only play 3-4 games a year, so it would have to be less than $10/month for me to even consider it. Oh, and they would have to carry the games I want to play.
03/24/09
The one problem they will have the hardest time is latency over internet. I don't think they'll ever get that same buttery-smooth movement you get playing locally on your PC.
Of course, they can always solve that problem with auto-targeting. :)