Gizmodo 
Enter your username and password.
Tip your editors:
tips@gizmodo.com
Editorial Director:
Brian Lam | Email | Twitter
Editor:
Jason Chen
Email | AIM | Twitter
Features Editor:
Wilson Rothman
Email | Twitter
Senior Contributing Editors:
Jesus Diaz
Email | AIM | Twitter
Mark Wilson, Reviews
Email | AIM | Twitter
Contributing Editors:
Matt Buchanan
Email | AIM | Twitter
Adam Frucci
Email | Twitter
Sean Fallon
Email | Twitter
Jack Loftus
Email | Twitter
John Herrman
Email | Twitter
Dan Nosowitz
Email
Chris Mascari
Email
Danny Allen
Email | Twitter
Rosa Golijan
Email | Twitter
Chris Jacob
Email
Columnist:
Brendan I. Koerner
Interns:
Don Nguyen
Email
Kyle VanHemert
Email
Comment Intern:
Nick Ellenoff | Email
Comment Account Questions:
Comments@gizmodo.com
Original material is licensed under a Creative Commons License permitting non-commercial sharing with attribution.
02/24/09
In fact I JUST built twin Core i7 gaming systems this past weekend for my bro-in law and I running Windows 7 64 too!
I've always sworn by Intel CPUs and chipsets for their reliability, but my mind is blown with the Core i7.
Newegg actually GAVE AWAY AMD CPUs with our orders!
Now I have three of these "brisbane" things sitting around taking up space.
So anyway, good luck.
02/24/09
02/24/09
02/24/09
02/24/09
02/24/09
02/24/09
02/25/09
02/24/09
Do we really want AMD to go away? Not if we like decent prices and continued improvement.
If AMD dies, we lose a lot more than just an alternative.
I always try to buy and promote AMD and will do so until they get more of a footing against a huge and very, very good Intel. I have yet to be dissappointed with any AMD products in the recent past.
02/24/09
They are competitive for the moment, and the review says so, but points out that they will need to make further architectural improvements to stay competitive, as intel is already set on an easier performance growth path.
11/21/08
Processors these days are about POWER CONSUMPTION - not clock speed. Who gives 2 dicks if your processor clocks at 4 Ghz if it takes a small coal plant to run the bitch.
AMD keeps losing the performance-per-watt game with intel and it doesn't seem like its going to change any time soon - but here's hoping.. I'd love to see some genuine competition again.
11/21/08
That really depends on whether you're talking about a laptop or a desktop. If you're planning to run it on batteries, then absolutely you want to keep power consumption low, but for a desktop...not so much. Not when you're talking about people who fill their case with light systems and hook up all kinds of crazy USB devices just because they = fun.
11/21/08
So, if you happen to have a ready supply of dry ice, you can turn it up to 11.
Those of us who don't have dry ice will have to keep it to more rational speeds.
How far can we crank an Intel chip w/ a block of dry ice sitting atop the heat sinks?
I'm thinking that real world applications of the dry ice cooling system are going to be pretty limited.
11/21/08
Ever hear what it sounds like when you drop a coin on a block of dry ice? I'm not sure I'd want to have it actually sitting _on_ the heat-sink.
11/21/08
11/21/08
11/21/08
11/21/08
I'm not saying there arent users who need more power, but I can't help but feel that there is a tremendous amount of effort is being wasted on the top .5% of "power-users".
11/21/08
But right now, an older 32-bit 2GHz Core Duo is still running well for me, even with CS2 running through Rosetta emulation.
11/21/08
11/21/08