<![CDATA[Gizmodo: phenom]]> http://cache.gawker.com/assets/base/img/thumbs140x140/gizmodo.com.png <![CDATA[Gizmodo: phenom]]> http://gizmodo.com/tag/phenom http://gizmodo.com/tag/phenom <![CDATA[ AMD's Phenom X4 9950 Processor has Green 9350e, 9150e Siblings ]]> Technically, the trio of new processors from AMD are pretty much the same: they have the same core, and similar feature sets. But while the 9950 Black Edition is a 140W, 2.6GHz overclockable monster (the most power-hungry Phenom AMD has made) the 9350 (2GHz) and 9150 (1.8GHz) are selectively binned and draw just 65W TDP. This makes them the most "power friendly" quadcore processors there are. The 9950 will cost $235 and at HotHardware.com they think it compares with Intel's Core 2 Quad Q6600. While the 9350 and 9150 will cost $195 and $175 respectively, meaning that "eco-friendliness" won't save you many dollars in the chip price, but will cost you a chunk of clock speed. [HotHardware and UberGizmo]

]]>
Tue, 01 Jul 2008 05:47:00 EDT Kit Eaton http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5020983&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ AMD X3 Tri-Core Processor Reviewed (Verdict: Get a Quad-Core Chip) ]]> x3.jpgMaximum PC has reviewed AMD's tri-core 2.4GHz Phenom X3 8750 CPU. It performs like you'd expect—in between quad and dual cores. Fine, but it's $195. You can pick up AMD's top quad core, the X4 9850 for only $235, or Intel's Q6600 (which mercilessly beat down the X4 9850 in benchmarks) for $224 now, or hell, $200 in a few weeks. So just get a quad core. Maximum PC also hints that a Core 2 Duo might keep pace with the tri-cores, but they're keeping that under wraps for now, bastards. [Maximum PC]

]]>
Wed, 23 Apr 2008 00:31:00 EDT matt buchanan http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=382941&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ AMD Phenom X3 Triple Core Processors Are Crippled Quad Cores in Disguise ]]> x3.jpgPart of AMD's multi-core Phenom blast today is the Phenom X3 8000, "the world's only triple-core x86 processor," which we heard about a few months ago. They're supposed to bargain chips for budget consumers, but they're a nicer bargain for AMD, actually, since it lets them dump bug-plagued quad-core Phenomsby disabling a core. But if performance is your top concern, you might want to steer clear of the whole Phenom batch anyway. We're still waiting for AMD's 45nm chippies, personally. [Hard OCP, Anandtech]

]]>
Thu, 27 Mar 2008 21:30:48 EDT matt buchanan http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=373185&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ AMD Quad-Core Phenom X4 9850 Reviewed (Verdict: Owned by Intel Quad Cores) ]]> amd_logo_purdy.jpgThe Phenom X4 9850 is at the top of AMD's latest heap of quad-core Phenoms. It's free of the performance-sapping bug that plagued the first batch of Phenoms, and AMD hopes it'll claw back some ground from Intel. Maximum PC stacked it up against two quad-cores from Intel—the mid-rangeish Penryn Core 2 Quad Q9300, as well as an older Core 2 Q6600. Ouchies for AMD, the Intel pair blew past it.

The Penryn-based Q9300 "owned the night," with the Q6600 trailing, and Phenom in back of both. It wasn't "so far behind as to be dead in the water" but "it doesn't quite go head-to-head with the Penryn lite." (They call the Q9300 Penryn-lite because it has half the cache of the higher-end Penryn quad-cores.)

The 9850 X4 is the fastest AM2 chip around, however, so if you're sticking with that board "it's a pretty good upgrade." The bigger problem is that AMD still has nothing to touch Intel's top quad cores, and won't for months, at least. [Maximum PC]

]]>
Thu, 27 Mar 2008 00:57:39 EDT matt buchanan http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=372738&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ AMD Tri-Core Phenom Chips Coming to Dell Computers ]]> Amid rumors of Dell dropping AMD processors, TG Daily has discovered Dell actually plans to release a new line of Optiplex PCs with AMD Tri-Core Phenom processors. They also report Dell plans to feature AMD chips in future consumer products later this year. [TG Daily]

]]>
Sat, 16 Feb 2008 20:30:05 EST Adrian Covert http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=357360&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Intel Delays 45nm Quad-Core CPUs to Give AMD a Breather ]]> Rather than continue hammering on AMD while they're down, Intel is apparently taking AMD's troubles as a little break of their own, delaying the launch of three 45nm quad-core Core 2 processors (Yorkfields) until Feb. or March, depending on AMD's release schedule for its upcoming tri-core and Phenom processors. This kind of reminds us of when Toyota wanted to raise its own prices to help out GM and Ford, which makes us sad. We prefer the far bloodier and more competitive processor wars of a couple years ago. [Digitimes via Inquirer]

]]>
Wed, 19 Dec 2007 16:45:35 EST matt buchanan http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=335899&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ ATI Has Triplets Thanks to AMD's New 55nm Processors ]]> ATI%20R680%20GI.jpgAMD has just announced they shall be releasing three new graphics processors. ATI's R680 is the new model grabbing all the attention, thanks to its dual 55nm processor core. AMD were clear in stating the 55nm processors have identical specifications to those used in an earlier model, but the older RV670 GPU contained only one 55nm Phenom processor. The R680 will bring twice the fun with its dual core goodness and CrossFireX support.

AMD are also set to revise two existing models, the RV610 and RV630, which will both be treated to new 55nm processors, but shall remain otherwise identical. We know that Phenom cores have had a tough time courting favor with the experts, and though the new AMD triplet seem great on paper, we'll reserve judgment till they are unwrapped and put to the test. The products will all hit next month. Happy New Year, gamers. [Daily Tech]


]]>
Fri, 14 Dec 2007 05:50:00 EST Haroon Malik http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=333903&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Although we said AMD would make the Q4 2007 ... ]]> Although we said AMD would make the Q4 2007 ship dates of Phenom chips, the '07 shipments are not going to be "substantial," says AMD's honcho. Better luck in 2008! [Reg Hardware]

]]>
Mon, 23 Jul 2007 08:40:19 EDT Wilson Rothman http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=281220&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ AMD Quad Core Phenom Gaming System in the Flesh (and Blood) ]]> We just got the chance to play around with AMD's newest quad core system, the Phenom RD790 and a pair of ATI HD2900XT graphics processors. There's a whole lot of cooling going on, thanks to John Woo's new game Stranglehold. AMD is still mum on pricing and final specs, though they did reaffirm their desire to ship this sucker in "early Q4" of this year, so like October? The system managed the Havoc physics engine with ease, jumping into sepia-toned "tequila" time and into a zoom mode that gave a bullet's eye view of the action. Lack of specs notwithstanding, the experience was mesmerizing, right up to the point where one of the bad guys in the game took a bullet in the nuts, and I actually felt his pain. Wanna see?

nutshot_1.jpg
nutshot_2.jpg
nutshot_3.jpg

]]>
Thu, 19 Jul 2007 14:00:00 EDT Wilson Rothman http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=280245&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ AMD Rolls Out Phenom X2 and Phenom X4 Processors, FASN8 Platform ]]> amd_logo_purdy.jpgNow it's official, AMD has bumped its Athlon processors off the high horse and replaced them with Phenom X2 (dual core) and Phenom X4 (quad core) processors, and the company says these new chips will be part of its enthusiast platform it calls FASN8. The company's saying that when you lash these chips together with its DirectX 10 ATI Radion HD 2000 series graphics cards shipped today, you'll get, well, some serious graphics performance. We'll believe it when we see it, but the ability to have two of these quad-core processors on one motherboard will surely make for some serious eight-way action.

AMD added lots of bluster along with the announcement, too:

With this announcement, AMD also unleashes some world-class marketing guff, calling these Phenom X4 chips the first "true quad core" processors, accusing "other products" of "packaging two dual core chips to form their quad core processors." Accusations such as this volley directed at Intel signal a hot chip war on the way.

It's going to take a lot for AMD to catch up to Intel, though, but the enhanced performance per watt of these chips, along with their Dual Socket Direct Connect architecture, 128-bit FPUs and shared L3 cache might just put a bit of heat on Intel for a while. We can't wait to see the benchmarks on these chips, because until we see the performance numbers, this just sounds like a lot of mumbo-jumbo.

Press Release [AMD]

]]>
Mon, 14 May 2007 09:32:29 EDT Charlie White http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=260149&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ AMD's Quad-core CPUs Leaked? ]]> athlon64x2.jpg AMD has been pretty quiet, but that doesn't mean they haven't been thinking of ways to put an end to Intel's desktop dominance. Details have been leaked on the company's first four-core CPU, dubbed the Phenom X4.

The CPU will come in at speeds ranging from 2.2GHz to 2.6GHz, with HyperTransport speeds of 3.2GHz and 3.6GHz. For power users, AMD has the Phenom FX chips, which you'll be able to pair in twos for 8-core performance. The high-end FX and X4 chips are expected to ship this summer followed by mid-level X4s later in the year. Hopefully this marks the start of the Intel versus AMD war again.

Final AMD "Stars" Models Unveiled [DailyTech via Electronista]

]]>
Mon, 07 May 2007 12:15:00 EDT Louis Ramirez http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=258226&view=rss&microfeed=true