They will never learn, or at least it seems they never will. If someone was going to pay for the movie, then they will. MPAA doesn't loose money for every movie downloaded, mainly if people couldn't download it they would go on without out. Same thinking the RIAA has for saying ever downloaded song is a lost sale. Taking cell phones isn't helping anything but pissing off the people who actually went to see the movie.
Remember wolverine that was leaked and how MPAA was claiming it cost them millions? Well they shut the heck up when the movie did really well.
Almost everyone I speak with supports artists, movies, programmers who they use and appreciate, and buy the album when it comes out, even if they downloaded it for free.
They actually did have a DRM system for screeners that was very tight-- you had a special DVD player, and the disc that you got would only work in that player.
The problem is that the people getting the screeners didn't want to be limited to just the one player-- they wanted to be able to watch it on a laptop, or at their ski lodge, etc.
In other words, they had the same problem that all us normal folks have with DRM-- they didn't want to be told how they had to watch the movie.
They also have the ability to watermark individual DVDs, and the watermarks are supposed to survive any encoding that you throw at them, but I can only think of one case where they actually busted someone for piracy using the watermarks.
All digitally projected movies carry similar invisible watermarks, but that just tells you where and when it was stolen. If it was a casual cammer, that won't help you nail them. You can bet that if an employee is regularly camming at their theater, they're going to know not to cam the digital presentations.
@pagan_god: Many torrenters will blur the water marks. I've also HEARD(not seen, as that would be illegal ;D ) about videos that will cut out the watermarked areas of the film, so you will get scene jumps.
This is why it pisses me off so much that Canada has recently been getting seriously bad press over piracy when its the movie studios themselves that are leaking them unintentionally. Then pay off OUR politicians to pass laws to try and make stricter antipiracy laws here.
Ask anyone who actually visits sites like TPB etc who download movies, most of the movies are either Screeners (aka, leaked internally) or filmed in a russian theatre (with russian subtitles).
Another thing, alot of cammed recordings are not done by random joe public. They are usually done by someone working for a theatre. You can tell this is true when the audio is great and dosnt match the video, its when they plug in the input into the theatres speaker system or get the audio after filming.
@Scazza: The good audio is usually pulled from Drive In's. Since the sound is piped into the cars, they just record it that way. You will notice there may be many different versions of the same film b/c people will mix different audio sources with the same video and re-encode it for the best quality they can.
I hate to say it but FiOS hasn't done me wrong yet. They let me upload 4 images every two minutes ::comma:: 24/7 ::comma:: and also host the main JerseyCam site.
@QuadNipple_GitEmSteveDave: I'm jealous. I still can't get FiOS in my area, and Verizon has no way of giving a time frame. Also, their website now can't even find my address. Maybe they are planning on bulldozing my house to make room for FiOS equipment?
@No,Comma_GitEmSteveDave: Too bad they have been handing over customer information to the DMCA, RIAA, and Feds under the table w/o a warrant for ages.
The days are gone of Comcast fighting back for its customers I guess. Don't any of you remember the 90's and early 2000 with them fighting the DMCA, RIAA, and the Feds tooth and nail over customer information? Seriously, they were all about protecting their customers and now after 5 years of people dragging their name in the dirt, abusing their connections, and hating them simply because they are Comcast it has come to this?
It's absolutely pathetic and it's only going to get worse. As Comcast implements stuff like this the others will follow because they will not be able to compete with the new price points. If the illegal stuff all goes away it will more than likely reduce their usage by 30% and if they cut their prices by even ½ that?
I think in a few years we will all be wishing that ISPs were still just shaping torrents… This is just the beginning.
Oh and for the record, I've been with Comcast since their cable internet pilot over 10 years ago. I have yet to have a problem that I didn't create.
@No,Comma_GitEmSteveDave: No, they were and are cooperating with the RIAA, DMCA, and the Feds even when they don't have to.
The story is about Comcast yanking your connection for illegal activity so I took your comment to mean that Verizon doesn't participate in that kind of action. If that wasn't your point, then I apologize for the massive OT response ;)
@UnderLoK: Oh, ok. Cuz if they wanted to peek into my house, all any of those agencies has to do is fire up JerseyCam, which is the site all of my inhouse cams are featured on.
@Jon B.: I don't know so I'm forced to use html code. It's a pain in the butt but it works. I tried reporting it to the bug site but that site is down as well.
@Hello Mister Walrus: Please everyone know commas are a bag of hurt Gizmodo is on the cutting edge with new "Invisible commas" their like commas but only special people see them.
@Jon B.: Haven't you heard? The commas are on strike today. They are tired of being taken for granted and being generally regarded as inferior to the period.
@Jrsy Devil's Advocate: They should be worried. Remember when the octothorpes went on strike and Reagan fired them all? And I still get chills when I think about the great tittle revolt.
07/15/09
Just wanna be clear here.
Piracy is bad, but if the rules are always the same about phones at screenings then I don't see the issue here.
Why would you have a phone at a theater anyway?
I don't bring inappropriate items to events that discourage them, nor should others.
It seems like the issues are being mixed here.
07/15/09
Remember wolverine that was leaked and how MPAA was claiming it cost them millions? Well they shut the heck up when the movie did really well.
Almost everyone I speak with supports artists, movies, programmers who they use and appreciate, and buy the album when it comes out, even if they downloaded it for free.
Try not pissing off your customers.
07/15/09
The problem is that the people getting the screeners didn't want to be limited to just the one player-- they wanted to be able to watch it on a laptop, or at their ski lodge, etc.
In other words, they had the same problem that all us normal folks have with DRM-- they didn't want to be told how they had to watch the movie.
They also have the ability to watermark individual DVDs, and the watermarks are supposed to survive any encoding that you throw at them, but I can only think of one case where they actually busted someone for piracy using the watermarks.
All digitally projected movies carry similar invisible watermarks, but that just tells you where and when it was stolen. If it was a casual cammer, that won't help you nail them. You can bet that if an employee is regularly camming at their theater, they're going to know not to cam the digital presentations.
07/15/09
07/15/09
07/14/09
07/15/09
07/15/09
07/15/09
07/14/09
Ask anyone who actually visits sites like TPB etc who download movies, most of the movies are either Screeners (aka, leaked internally) or filmed in a russian theatre (with russian subtitles).
Another thing, alot of cammed recordings are not done by random joe public. They are usually done by someone working for a theatre. You can tell this is true when the audio is great and dosnt match the video, its when they plug in the input into the theatres speaker system or get the audio after filming.
07/15/09
07/14/09
07/14/09
07/15/09
07/14/09
01/28/09
01/28/09
01/28/09
01/28/09
...Meanwhile back on topic..
I pay for all my software and media files so I'm not fussed at all.
01/28/09
Which state is that?
The state of siege!
01/28/09
01/28/09
01/28/09
01/28/09
The days are gone of Comcast fighting back for its customers I guess. Don't any of you remember the 90's and early 2000 with them fighting the DMCA, RIAA, and the Feds tooth and nail over customer information? Seriously, they were all about protecting their customers and now after 5 years of people dragging their name in the dirt, abusing their connections, and hating them simply because they are Comcast it has come to this?
It's absolutely pathetic and it's only going to get worse. As Comcast implements stuff like this the others will follow because they will not be able to compete with the new price points. If the illegal stuff all goes away it will more than likely reduce their usage by 30% and if they cut their prices by even ½ that?
I think in a few years we will all be wishing that ISPs were still just shaping torrents… This is just the beginning.
Oh and for the record, I've been with Comcast since their cable internet pilot over 10 years ago. I have yet to have a problem that I didn't create.
01/28/09
01/29/09
The story is about Comcast yanking your connection for illegal activity so I took your comment to mean that Verizon doesn't participate in that kind of action. If that wasn't your point, then I apologize for the massive OT response ;)
01/29/09
01/28/09
01/28/09
01/28/09
01/28/09
But why aren't the commas working?
01/28/09
01/28/09
01/28/09
01/28/09
01/28/09
You can see the commas.... right?
01/28/09
01/28/09
01/28/09
01/28/09
AAAAGH! There is supposed to be a comma after "...for my name" to set it off as a clause. DAMN YOU GIZMODO AND YOUR DECOMMAFIER! DAMN YOU TO HELL!
01/28/09
Brenda?
01/28/09
01/28/09
They're taking a vacation from punctuation..
01/28/09
01/28/09
01/28/09
Yeah?