@Woz: Granted that I did not attend one of the demo's, and that my statement's are subjective; I stand by them.
I have seen several movies in 3D in recent months. In all cases I found it distracting and gimmicky. The only reason I saw them, was my inattention at the box office, and I didn't realize they were 3D.
I recently took a survey about a movie I very much want to see, in which one question was "Does knowing that this movie will be released in 3D make you want to:
A)Absolutely see it
B)Maybe see it
3)Don't care / doesn't affect decision
4)Maybe not to see it
5)Definitely not see it.
My answer was emphatically #5. I definitely do not want to see that movie, or any other, in 3D.
@Geisrud: The technology is considerbly better in what Panasonic is doing which would make it much improved over what your currently seeing in theaters. It was no contest, granted it was a controlled environment with source material designed specifically for the demo.
@Geisrud: I like the new 3D technology. It is a huge step from the red/blue technology and I agree that it is at times distracting from the story, but I see it as a step toward perfecting the art. I look forward to a more realistic form of 3D that makes you feel as a part of the story and not just a spectator. What fun games will be when 3D is perfected!
@SEDAGIVE?!: For cable TV outside the U.S--sport was the driver, so it could be the same here. To that end, the NBA has done tets...and Sky in the UK is looking at 3D football and Olympics broadcasts. That *could* be what gets it past the line.
@TVGenius: My though exactly!!!. First thing I though was you NEVER put on of these on the side, they are not engineered to handle 120+ Lbs on the plastic side of it. The Frikking base is at the BASE.... So I though maybe it's OK and the box does not say... NOPE. Sure enough the arrow is on the upper left of the box.
I bet when they stack them, they lay them flat to save space. (another NO-NO).
@aec007: Yeah, laying 'em flat is probably the worst of the ways to lay 'em, especially when shipping. Vibration and bumps will cause the glass to bow.
Probably not too bad on the side; sure it's 120+ lbs., but the plastic is nicely ensconced in foam, so the lbs./in.^2 won't be too bad. Shipping them that way probably gets bad though.
..and how did you not get one of those into the back of a taxi? The hand truck is right there. They're making it so easy that it's practically not stealing!
Nice try but no... Pioneer smoked anything and everything for color quality and black levels ohhh and speed. (Every Plasma is 480HZ) Plus none of that weird movie speed up and lag that 120Hz sets give out. Pioneer was the best and even now that they are out of the game they are still the best.
@MacMasterShane: I don't actually own a Samsung TV. I'm still in Sony land. But Sony seems so 20th century, and Samsung seems so New Millenium, so whenever I get my druthers to upgrade, I'd probably consider SS over S.
@ScottRose: You've got me there, and that is why I couldn't find the super wide LCD's in LG's booth. However we all know it's still a dick swinging contest for the manufacturers. I have a small vintage camera museum in a little hutch at home. Does that count?
I don't own a museum or a lobby or a control room, but I do supply to those that do. I attended for them.
@cheff: It's cool, I'm just making trouble for trouble's sake.
Totally a dick swinging contest.. But in this economy, they probably have better places to spend money than on the ol' shvantz. (Not that I agree with that).
Shouldn't the 2001 Space Odyssey music be playing as that sucker swoops on in. It is a work of art. Until the next better work of art shows up next week, that is.
09/28/09
I sincerely hope this craze goes away soon.
09/28/09
09/28/09
I have seen several movies in 3D in recent months. In all cases I found it distracting and gimmicky. The only reason I saw them, was my inattention at the box office, and I didn't realize they were 3D.
I recently took a survey about a movie I very much want to see, in which one question was "Does knowing that this movie will be released in 3D make you want to:
A)Absolutely see it
B)Maybe see it
3)Don't care / doesn't affect decision
4)Maybe not to see it
5)Definitely not see it.
My answer was emphatically #5. I definitely do not want to see that movie, or any other, in 3D.
09/28/09
09/28/09
09/28/09
(Excluding the inevitable holographic imaging)
09/28/09
09/28/09
04/07/09
04/07/09
First thing I though was you NEVER put on of these on the side, they are not engineered to handle 120+ Lbs on the plastic side of it. The Frikking base is at the BASE....
So I though maybe it's OK and the box does not say...
NOPE. Sure enough the arrow is on the upper left of the box.
I bet when they stack them, they lay them flat to save space. (another NO-NO).
Idiots, just plain idiots....
04/07/09
Probably not too bad on the side; sure it's 120+ lbs., but the plastic is nicely ensconced in foam, so the lbs./in.^2 won't be too bad. Shipping them that way probably gets bad though.
04/07/09
04/07/09
04/07/09
02/20/09
02/20/09
I loved mine when it worked, and despise it now.
02/20/09
01/12/09
Also, that whole field of view thing. Unless my couch moves 50 feet away from my TV: DO NOT WANT.
01/12/09
01/13/09
01/13/09
Unless you, err, own a Museum, cheff. Do you? Do you own a museum?
01/13/09
I don't own a museum or a lobby or a control room, but I do supply to those that do. I attended for them.
01/13/09
Totally a dick swinging contest.. But in this economy, they probably have better places to spend money than on the ol' shvantz. (Not that I agree with that).
01/12/09
01/12/09
01/07/09
01/07/09
01/07/09
12/05/08
12/05/08
12/05/08
"if you want to spend about $1,200 buck on a 426" LCD, you know that the Samsung LN46A550 is a safe bet."
12/05/08