a) it is magenta
2) I never trust any device that relies on a service for which there is no charge. That just seems destined to become useless (or substantially less useful) when this company goes out of business.
So this is basically a NAS with no native storage and a free web service to access your files? Sounds pretty good although it isn't very aesthetically pleasing especially if you were to have four external USB drives hooked up to it.
So... How is this better than buying a WiFi router that has a USB port for sharing a drive? You can buy a DLINK DIR-628 for about $69... and it does more.
What I meant to say was that this amuses me; right after the conficker scare, there is this device that "lets you put any hard drive on the internet easily". Yes, let's do exactly that, because I'm sure this thing is securamundo.
(I do realize that it proooobably doesn't run Windows, and hence isn't susceptible to conficker. But my security point remains).
Also, is it a power brick in of itself, or does it just play one on TV?
"The only downside is that you better hope Pogoplug remains in business, or your $100 file-sharing gadget just turned into a $100 projectile."
And that's the reason I would never buy it. Anything that relies on service to operate, but is not billed as a service is doomed to failure. That's true no matter what company is behind it, but it's doubly true for startups.
There are other USB NASs out there from Linksys, Addonics and others that don't rely on a service to continue operation. They might not have iPhone integration or some of the other features, but knowing that they'll continue to operate for more than a year makes that sacrifice worth it.
@weatherman: Everything fails on a long enough time line. I could give you examples of service-based products that have yet to fail, but you have the internet, too.
@Brett Benedict: sure, things break, but I'm sure you're smart enough to tell that there's a difference between things breaking or becoming obsolete and things actually being rendered completely useless because the manufacturer decided to pull support or went under.
11/20/09
a) it is magenta
2) I never trust any device that relies on a service for which there is no charge. That just seems destined to become useless (or substantially less useful) when this company goes out of business.
11/20/09
11/20/09
#tips
11/20/09
11/20/09
Rosa go to sleep.
11/20/09
11/20/09
11/20/09
11/20/09
11/20/09
11/20/09
11/20/09
Someone correct me if I somehow missed others, please.
04/06/09
04/06/09
04/06/09
04/06/09
04/06/09
(She is annoying though).
04/06/09
04/06/09
04/06/09
Ehh.
What I meant to say was that this amuses me; right after the conficker scare, there is this device that "lets you put any hard drive on the internet easily". Yes, let's do exactly that, because I'm sure this thing is securamundo.
(I do realize that it proooobably doesn't run Windows, and hence isn't susceptible to conficker. But my security point remains).
Also, is it a power brick in of itself, or does it just play one on TV?
04/06/09
04/06/09
04/06/09
And that's the reason I would never buy it. Anything that relies on service to operate, but is not billed as a service is doomed to failure. That's true no matter what company is behind it, but it's doubly true for startups.
There are other USB NASs out there from Linksys, Addonics and others that don't rely on a service to continue operation. They might not have iPhone integration or some of the other features, but knowing that they'll continue to operate for more than a year makes that sacrifice worth it.
04/06/09
04/06/09
04/06/09
04/06/09
04/06/09
/sarcasm
04/06/09
I wonder what part will step on what company's toes to have it pulled from the market or gimped to a shadow of it's former self?