Senior Contributing Editors:
Jesus Diaz
| AIM | Twitter
Mark Wilson, Reviews
| AIM | Twitter
Contributing Editors:
Matt Buchanan | AIM | Twitter
Adam Frucci | Twitter
Sean Fallon | Twitter
Jack Loftus | Twitter
John Herrman | Twitter
Dan Nosowitz
Chris Mascari
Danny Allen | Twitter
Rosa Golijan | Twitter
Chris Jacob
Unfortunately, the people who should read this article are the last ones who will. Because most of those people who don't know when to use their flash are the idiots that don't know the difference between the auto and manual settings on their cameras.
As long as there's stupid people, there will be unnecessary flash.
I'm constantly amazed by people who use their flash in sporting events. I mean really - do they think their tiny flash will add ANY light to the scene?
And then there's the people who flash through glass.
Me, I keep my camera at ISO 3200 and never touch the flash. :)
My father (who used to work for Kodak) always commented on the camera flashes we used to see on TV during major sporting events and how useless they were.
"Every time I go to a nighttime sporting event or concert, I see hundreds of starry flickers coming from the stands. When I see them, I die a little inside."
@Navin R Johnson: Oh, I just remembered, if your point and shoot has a "night shot" mode this can be useful for taking cool photos in dark clubs or say a carnival at night.
It fires the flash but also keeps the shutter open so you get a clear photo of the foreground (usually people) and tracers of any moving lights too. Cool effect.
I think it's important to note that many point-and-shoots don't have decent settings for exposure, and as such when you turn the flash off, the exposure time automatically lengthens. So, in the case of the stadium, no, your flash will not reach the players, but you will get a much crisper picture overall and the flash won't otherwise have an effect on the picture as long as there aren't any objects in the way and the stadium in lit decently. I've found myself enabling the flash just for this purpose at a baseball game before.
@bigosaballer: So true. I have a camera where I can edit some settings, but not all. The flash, flashes 3 times and blinds people (didnt know when I got the camera in St. Maarten when my old one broke). I have to use flash every time, even though I know flash should be set off. The photos look great with flash on (sometimes the flash messes it up though). But when I turn off the flash, all I get is 8 Megapixils of blur.
@tyskkvinna: I hold it steady, the camera turned out to be a not so good camera. I used it at Sea world a few weeks ago, had major lag... Missed the shots I wanted to get, but ended up with some other great shots.
I'd like to edit the section about reducing the flash's intensity. It does not, in fact, "just" turn down the brightness. By doing so, you generally also change the color temperature of the light it emits, so instead of being, say, white, it will get more yellow. That's a problem if you want to get your white balance right (though the auto mode of your camera might be good enough to compensate, I haven't had much luck even with my G9).
10/08/09
As long as there's stupid people, there will be unnecessary flash.
10/08/09
10/08/09
And then there's the people who flash through glass.
Me, I keep my camera at ISO 3200 and never touch the flash. :)
10/07/09
10/07/09
10/07/09
10/07/09
Amen. Amen.
10/07/09
10/07/09
10/07/09
Using a flash with a diffuser or even bouncing the light off a wall or ceiling makes such a huge difference in the quality of a photo.
It's a shame camera companies don't make point and shoot cameras with pivoting flashes or little diffusers.
10/07/09
It fires the flash but also keeps the shutter open so you get a clear photo of the foreground (usually people) and tracers of any moving lights too. Cool effect.
10/07/09
10/07/09
10/07/09
10/07/09
10/07/09
10/07/09
10/07/09
10/07/09
Yeah, their photos are going to suck, but it makes me feel special.
10/07/09