<![CDATA[Gizmodo: pollution]]> http://tags.gizmodo.com/assets/base/img/thumbs140x140/gizmodo.com.png <![CDATA[Gizmodo: pollution]]> http://gizmodo.com/tag/pollution http://gizmodo.com/tag/pollution <![CDATA[Russia To Ring The Arctic With Floating Nuclear Power Stations]]> Poor Mr. Polar Bear. When he's not jumping from melting ice chunk to ice chunk trying desperately not to drown, he's avoiding the floating Russian nuclear power stations and their potential toxic waste.

You read that correctly, fellow Net denizens. Coming soon, Mr. Polar Bear and his brethren will be sharing real estate with a ring of floating, self-sustained nuclear power stations. It's all part of Russia's—and the world's—ongoing thirst for energy.

Environmentalists are understandably outraged over the impact said stations could have on an already endangered area of the globe, and if polar bears could talk, I imagine they'd be outraged too.

Said a rep from Bellona, a Scandinavian environmental watchdog group, "[The plan] is highly risky. The risk of a nuclear accident on a floating power plant is increased. The plants' potential impact on the fragile Arctic environment through emissions of radioactivity and heat remains a major concern. If there is an accident, it would be impossible to handle."

Oh, and there's this fear that Russia will simply dump the radioactive waste into the Arctic Sea anwyay, which they've done before on several occasions. To date at least 12 nuclear reactors from decommissioned Russian submarines have been dumped, along with more than 5,000 containers of solid and liquid waste.

Pretty soon the ocean will be like a 24/7 aurora borealis up there. A wonderful, cancer-causing aurora borealis. [Guardian]

]]>
http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5238124&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Robotic Carp Unleashed Into the Sea to Sniff Out Pollution]]> Those crazy looking robotic carp now have a job-a whole school of them are going to be released into the sea off northern Spain to help detect hazardous pollutants in the water.

Created by engineers at the University of Essex, they measure about 8 feet long, can swim at roughly 2.24mph and feature real fish-like undulating action. Each fish has its own navigation system, so they can swim around the port without human control. When their batteries are running low, they return to dock at the charging station.

So what's the cost for these fishy pollution sniffers? About $30,000. Yeesh. Didn't anyone tell these guys that money doesn't grow on seas? [The Register via Crunchgear]

]]>
http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5176420&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[60 Minutes Reporter Investigates China's E-Waste Pits, Gets Attacked]]> 60 Minutes correspondent Scott Pelley went to Guiyi, China to document the lives of Chinese e-waste workers there. He was able to get footage of what these pits, which process much of the toxic electronic scrap we in the West throw away, look like—despite being jumped by angry e-waste lot owners and nearly having his camera confiscated.

The Chinese who attacked them were trying to keep mum on the lucrative business of mining e-waste for valuable components, including gold. According to Jim Puckett, who works for a group working to stop the dumping of toxic materials in third world countries, “A lot of people are turning a blind eye here. And if somebody makes enough noise, they're afraid this [business] is all going to dry up.”

The workers who sift through these e-waste pits get paid about $8 a day. They use caustic chemicals and often burn plastic without any type of protection uniform. The air is full of toxins, potable water needs to be trucked in, and pregnancies in the city are six times more likely to be miscarriages. All to deal with the mess we ship over. Sometimes it's easy to forget that even though we don't see our trash anymore, it still exists. And even though America has laws against e-dumping, companies regularly flout them with little repercussion.

Pelley's investigation will be broadcast on CBS this Sunday at 7pm. [CBS News via China Digital Times]

]]>
http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5079133&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Blade Exhaust Filters: An Eco-Friendly Gadget That Actually Makes Your Car Look Cooler]]> Generally speaking, the idea of eco-friendliness doesn't conjure up images of badass looking vehicles. However, one look at these Blade exhaust filters might change all that. According to the manufacturer's lab testing, Blade can reduce vehicle air pollution up to 57 percent and CO2 emissions up to 34 percent while increasing fuel economy up to five miles per gallon. It seems a little far-fetched (and it probably is), but Blade does have support from both the California Air Resources Board and the EPA. If those claims are anywhere near true, the $200 up front cost of the system plus the $20 a year for filters should pay for itself rather quickly. [Blade via Treehugger via Wired Gadget Lab]

]]>
http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5067780&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Sony Ericsson Wins Greenest Electronics Company Award]]> Congratulations, Sony Ericsson, for winning what was ultimately a barely challenging competition to become the greenest electronics company around. Our favorite Swedish-Japanese conglomerate rose to the top of Greenpeace's Greener Electronics Guide by exceeding Energy Star requirements, making all its models PVC-free and banning the most harmful chemicals from phones launched since January 2008. Unfortunately, it was valedictorian in a class whose scores have plummeted all around.

In fact, Sony Ericsson was the only company to score more than 5 out of 10 in the Greener Electronics Guide, which judges tech giants on their recycling programs, their use of harmful chemicals and their energy waste. Microsoft and Nintendo were at the very bottom of the guide, with Microsoft's exceedingly low score on climate criteria and Nintendo's Wii being more of a resource hog than one might expect.

The Information and Communications Technology sector accounts for two percent of global greenhouse gas emissions, and e-waste becomes a bigger and bigger problem the more we ignore it. While consumers like us can do our part by only buying the gadgets we need (and the greenest ones at that), companies really need to step up and rework internal policies to stop polluting. [Greenpeace]

]]>
http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5020636&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Group Sues EPA For Not Regulating Nano-Silver Pollution]]> Those nano-silver socks you've been using to soak up the rank of your athlete's foot—not only are they leaching poisons into fish habitats every time you wash them, their effects on your own blood stream could be just as bad; but the EPA's not doing anything about it. Fed up by government inaction, a consumer safety group is now suing the EPA for failing to regulate nanomaterials.

Silver has long been known to have antimicrobial powers, and with nanotech (and better hygiene) being all the rage, companies have added nanoparticle silver to everything from children's toys to washing machines. But as elements get smaller, the way they react to their environments change—and nobody's sure that itty bitty silver pieces aren't going to kill us all.

Studies have already shown that nano-silver is screwing with fishes and destroying benign bacteria at wastewater facilities. The legal petition asks the EPA to regulate nano-silver as a pesticide, insist on product labels, and analyze the potential human health effects (especially on children) before allowing nano-silver goods to be sold.

So unless you absolutely have no other way of keeping things clean and smell-free, lay off the nano-silver for now, mmkay? [ICTA via NY Times]

]]>
http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=386952&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[China's E-Waste Problem Poisons Children, Destroys Cities]]> Since the 1980s, cities like Guiyu, China, have been taking in electronic waste from other countries for dismantlement and processing. It's great for other countries, but takes a huge toll on the people managing the effort because of the "metal extraction of circuit boards" and "open dumping of waste and ash residue into open water". It's made the well water and ground water of Guiyu undrinkable, and has to be trucked in from other villages. The lead poisoning level in children is 69%. [China-Pix via Crunchgear]

]]>
http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=376201&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Robot that Jumps Like a Flea Can Sniff out Pollution]]> Scientists at an Italian university have come up with a pollution-detecting robot that jumps around like a flea. The palm-sized device was developed with its bug-like abilities to enable it to move more quickly over the ground when searching for the source of a noxious leak.


Umberto Scarfogliero, one of the men behind the University of Lucca project, says that the team focused on fleas and frogs in particular when researching the 'bot. "Robots like these are far more efficient than larger ones in scouring vast areas of land in a shorter time," he explained. The little critters are now being equipped with sensors that will allow them to locate sources of mercury poisoning. [Axcess News]

]]>
http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=290543&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Pollution-Detecting Camera Finds Invisible Killers]]> Apparently CO2 isn't all that bad when compared to some other horrible pollutants out there, such as Sulfur Hexafluoride (SF6). A single pound of SF6 does as much damage to the environment as two tons of CO2. Yikes. Used to insulate high voltage equipment, SF6 is odorless, nontoxic, and nonflammable yet still highly damaging to ol' Mother Earth. What to do?

Why, use the new GasFindIR-LW from FLIR Systems. As exciting to environmentalists as that Kaya nipple filter was to perverts, the camera is able to see very small amounts of SF6 in the air as well as 20 other noxious gasses. Once it spots them I'm not sure what you're supposed to do about it, but I guess knowing is half the battle.

Polution Online [via The Raw Feed]

]]>
http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=251048&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Pigeon Flock to be Decked Out Like Camera-Toting Tourists]]> It's great being at the top of the food chain. That means we can use animals for our own devices. Sorry, PETA, but that's the law the jungle. And here's a great example of our cooperation with (or if you prefer, enslavement of) animals, this time with our friends the pigeons. A flock of 20 of the birds will be enlisted to fly over San Jose, California this summer, checking for pollutants such as carbon monoxide and nitrogen dioxide. Researchers will equip each pigeon with a GPS receiver and air pollution sensors. Just to be sure all this is properly documented, each member of the flock will be decked out like a tourist, with a miniature camera hanging around its neck for aerial picture taking. All the resulting data will be sent back to home base using a miniature self-contained backpack that contains all the necessary gadgetry in addition to the guts of a cellphone. Watch for the results of this unique reconnaissance mission in August, where its data will be displayed on the Web in the form of an interactive map.

Pigeons get backpacks for air pollution monitoring [Reuters]

]]>
http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=152339&view=rss&microfeed=true