so that's a probably $6000 projector including the anamophic lens. motion capture hardware probably doubles that, then software engineering which probably still leaves room for 100% margin.
not a cool as the following application of projection and motion capture but I digress.
They're going to have to do a lot more work to get the spin of the cue ball - from the speed and placement of the cue on the cue ball - to make the augmented pool actually accurate. That's the biggest part of the game.
@Lassus: The biggest parts of the game are making shots, and placing your ball so that you can make a subsequent shot and/or so your opponent can't make theirs.
Putting english on the cue ball is just one method you might (or might not) use, conditionally.
And we aren't computers... computer analysis might let that thing predict out two or three shots.
It has an advantage that even professional pool players don't have - absolutely linear, repeatable-every-time stroke consistency.
I'd put a machine with that advantage and "in development" spin angles against a trick-shot expert english-specialist anyday.
Programming you can tweak, calculations can predict... people can only practice.
@geolemon: I wasn't actually talking about the robot player, but the augmented feature for guiding the human players. (I have no doubt the computer can be programmed to replicate any amount of english. I, for one, welcome our computer overlords.)
I'm not sure how they are going to tell the human player to spin the cue to get the proper placement for the next shot. The english of the cue ball is not just one of the ways to place the cue, it's the ONLY way. A lack of spin and english is an amount of english: none. And speed, of course. The augment feature, while also boring, I don't think would end up being a help against a decent player. That was my argument. It would be a good general teaching device, I suppose.
@iwishiwasjeff: That's why it's the best. Hide in plain sight, no one suspects that. Like that Japanese Gundam, no one suspects that it's really a superweapon.
@Homerjay. Good and good for you.: If it is, no doubt it's a horrible miscast that spouts cliched one-liners as it fails to properly kill one stupid douchey little boy.
@CargoHolder_GitEmSteveDave: Also, while Star Wars is awesome, I would gladly accept and inflatable Viper, Galactica, and of course, Starbuck(2004 series Kara Thrace, not Dirk Benedict)
@CargoHolder_GitEmSteveDave: +1 (I need an alternative to + 1. Preferably something generic that I could use as a reply to basically any comment OR I could try coming up with witty replies)
09/18/09
not a cool as the following application of projection and motion capture but I digress.
09/18/09
09/18/09
09/18/09
I thought she should be nude as well.
09/18/09
09/18/09
And that music was freaking terrible.
09/18/09
Putting english on the cue ball is just one method you might (or might not) use, conditionally.
And we aren't computers... computer analysis might let that thing predict out two or three shots.
It has an advantage that even professional pool players don't have - absolutely linear, repeatable-every-time stroke consistency.
I'd put a machine with that advantage and "in development" spin angles against a trick-shot expert english-specialist anyday.
Programming you can tweak, calculations can predict... people can only practice.
09/18/09
I'm not sure how they are going to tell the human player to spin the cue to get the proper placement for the next shot. The english of the cue ball is not just one of the ways to place the cue, it's the ONLY way. A lack of spin and english is an amount of english: none. And speed, of course. The augment feature, while also boring, I don't think would end up being a help against a decent player. That was my argument. It would be a good general teaching device, I suppose.
07/23/09
07/23/09
07/23/09
07/23/09
07/23/09
@Homerjay. Good and good for you.: Or a VW?
07/23/09
07/23/09
07/23/09
07/23/09
07/23/09
07/23/09
07/23/09
06/10/09
04/02/09
04/02/09
04/02/09
"This pool can't repel urine of that magnitude!"
(That was waaay funnier in my head before I typed it, trust me please).
04/02/09
04/02/09
04/02/09
04/02/09
Scruffy seconds.
04/02/09
04/02/09