I worked for a start up. The first few days my desk was a cardboard box flipped over on the floor and a phone. A coffee pot was the first thing I got. What good is a desk with no coffee?
@daqman: You 'ere lucky. I dreamed of 'avin me a box. I used to work fifteen odd hours a day in a back of a loo stall wit a RGB monitor and a Tandy 286 and had to use a ball mouse on my desk, but my desk was also a litter box filled with sand from the office kitty.
If it was Windows 3.11 Windows for Workgroups, I may actually consider it. . . or, if it was a PC made by Digital Equipment Co. (DEC)...well, I may take this seriously...
"Is real sale. I need money to buy new Pentium computer that will run the new Windows 95 program. Is supposed to be better than Windows 3 but I don't know. Am too used to finding things in Program Manager. The modem is real fast (by US Robotics) and is much faster than 9600 baud. Even though is 14.4, I got it to run at 28.8 with a program i downloaded.
Am willint to lower ask to $300 for if you have a Apple Mackintosh Quadra (850 preferable).
Also, I have the Netscape Communicator Gold although I just use the browser on it because it reads GIF images and JPG images."
This has to be a joke for a few reasons. The biggest one is the fact that he's talking about "K"s of RAM and a 486 DX 33Mhz would be looking at roughly 4mb. Cost of the RAM of course at the time running roughly $150/meg. Two other reasons, one, it would likely be running DOS 6.x seeing as it's running Windows 3.11 "For Workgroups" and lastly, 80mb is less than half of what most drives were at the time of the 486 DX 33 launch, WD's most popular drive at the time if I remember correctly was the 212mb.
I swear I'm not that big of a nerd.
Also, it just sounds like a joke. I think Giz just got trolled.
Actually the specs look to be pretty accurate. My first pc which I built in 1992 was a 486DX2/66Mhz and it had pretty similar specs. Of course mine cost abotu $2500 to build back then although I went with the 19" Idek iiyama monitor which added $800 to the bill
Accurate minus the points I brought up. Trust me, I'm pretty sure they didn't even make RAM chips that low for those motherboards. Windows 3.11 for Workgroups was released around DOS 6.0, 6.1 time and 80mb was definitely more of a high end 386 HD / very low end 486 DX 25Mhz HD.
There is no way in hell you had less than a meg of ram and only an 80mb HD on a 486 DX2 66.
Also, let me add that he makes no mention of a CD-Rom drive or a sound card which would've likely been something a long the lines of a Sound Blaster Card or a 2x CD-Rom. Both which are important specs for this era of computing and would've been worth mentioning.
@Jimbuck is your daddy.: We had one of those on our family computer when I was in high school. We were on the bleeding edge of home computing when we got our first Pentium Processor with a 1GB HDD.
What I always wondered is, why would you ever turn off the turbo?
@closhedbb: It's because older software would not run on these "fast" machines. You could therefore slow the computer down to make the computer backwards compatible.
06/22/09
06/22/09
06/22/09
06/22/09
+1?
06/23/09
06/22/09
06/22/09
05/15/09
Was that ad placed by John Titor?? I guess he doesn't need that IBM computer any more...
05/14/09
05/14/09
Note to self: don't spoil your own pranks.
Thanks to all who got the joke and to those genuinely wondering if it's real, ridiculous shit is not real!
05/14/09
05/14/09
"I will not try to break the internet."
"I will not try to break the internet."
"I will not try to break the internet."
"I will not try to break the internet."
"I will not try to break the internet."
"I will not try to break the internet."
"I will not try to break the internet."
"I will not try to break the internet."
"I will not try to break the internet."
"I will not try to break the internet."
"I will not try to break the internet."
And now I have detention too.
05/14/09
05/14/09
05/14/09
05/14/09
05/14/09
05/14/09
05/14/09
05/14/09
"Is real sale. I need money to buy new Pentium computer that will run the new Windows 95 program. Is supposed to be better than Windows 3 but I don't know. Am too used to finding things in Program Manager. The modem is real fast (by US Robotics) and is much faster than 9600 baud. Even though is 14.4, I got it to run at 28.8 with a program i downloaded.
Am willint to lower ask to $300 for if you have a Apple Mackintosh Quadra (850 preferable).
Also, I have the Netscape Communicator Gold although I just use the browser on it because it reads GIF images and JPG images."
05/14/09
I swear I'm not that big of a nerd.
Also, it just sounds like a joke. I think Giz just got trolled.
05/14/09
Actually the specs look to be pretty accurate. My first pc which I built in 1992 was a 486DX2/66Mhz and it had pretty similar specs. Of course mine cost abotu $2500 to build back then although I went with the 19" Idek iiyama monitor which added $800 to the bill
05/14/09
Accurate minus the points I brought up. Trust me, I'm pretty sure they didn't even make RAM chips that low for those motherboards. Windows 3.11 for Workgroups was released around DOS 6.0, 6.1 time and 80mb was definitely more of a high end 386 HD / very low end 486 DX 25Mhz HD.
There is no way in hell you had less than a meg of ram and only an 80mb HD on a 486 DX2 66.
05/14/09
Also, let me add that he makes no mention of a CD-Rom drive or a sound card which would've likely been something a long the lines of a Sound Blaster Card or a 2x CD-Rom. Both which are important specs for this era of computing and would've been worth mentioning.
05/14/09
[justinsomnia.org]
05/14/09
05/14/09
05/14/09
I picture a large red button to push.
05/14/09
What I always wondered is, why would you ever turn off the turbo?
05/14/09