Gizmodo 
Enter your username and password.
Tip your editors:
tips@gizmodo.com
Editorial Director:
Brian Lam | Email | Twitter
Editor:
Jason Chen
Email | AIM | Twitter
Features Editor:
Wilson Rothman
Email | Twitter
Senior Contributing Editors:
Jesus Diaz
Email | AIM | Twitter
Mark Wilson, Reviews
Email | AIM | Twitter
Contributing Editors:
Matt Buchanan
Email | AIM | Twitter
Adam Frucci
Email | Twitter
Sean Fallon
Email | Twitter
Jack Loftus
Email | Twitter
John Herrman
Email | Twitter
Dan Nosowitz
Email
Chris Mascari
Email
Danny Allen
Email | Twitter
Rosa Golijan
Email | Twitter
Chris Jacob
Email
Columnist:
Brendan I. Koerner
Interns:
Don Nguyen
Email
Kyle VanHemert
Email
Comment Intern:
Nick Ellenoff | Email
Comment Account Questions:
Comments@gizmodo.com
Original material is licensed under a Creative Commons License permitting non-commercial sharing with attribution.
11/20/09
11/21/09
I've always felt that was pretty weak tea.
If some nation engaged in rampant mandatory pedophilia, a company that decided it had to engage in pedophilia there to go along and get along wouldn't do that because it's a retarded analogy.
On the other hand, an information provider that relies on the fact that its home nation does not censor decides that to make more money by heading into a new market, it has to go along to get along by censoring the very info they're supposed to be providing cause by golly that's just how it's done there.
Not even to mention the whole respectability and authority of the names MS and Google. Wanna blow your nose or make a copy? Use a Kleenex or Xerox because those'll get'r'done. Wanna do a search of the information that is reliably presented to you because the provider is the world leader in search? Use Google, or Bing if MS managed to convince you to roll that way. Except if you actually want real unvarnished info on Tienanmen in Chinese that is.
11/21/09
I'm sure that'll do awesome for America's trade deficit.
06/30/09
For $200.
Crapgadget.
06/30/09
06/30/09
07/01/09
I run a small office and am in need of something like this, so I think that come September, I will start a serious evaluation to see which better suits my needs.
06/12/09
My older 15" MBP has two big issues with headphones that drive me nuts:
- With headphones, like with most cheap laptops, I can hear R2D2-like tones in the background when the computer is actively doing something. I hate this, it's so cheap. 10 years ago I had a $20 sound card that was better than this.
- Every time I plug in my headphones, MacOS assumes I want the master volume at 50% - which means if I don't hold shift and turn down the volume, it will blow my eardrums with the next thing it plays. (If I just turn down the volume without shift, I'm treated to very loud "POP POP POP POP POP" as it steps down volume levels.)
- It's less important, but still very annoying that when powering on, even with headphones plugged in, it will play the startup chime through the speakers. I know from the glowing Apple logo that Apple likes to go "HEY EVERYONE! I'M USING A MAC!!!" but it's seriously inconvenient and obnoxious needing to mute the system before shutting it down in case I want to start it in a quiet environment with other people around.
...so does anyone know if any of this has been resolved yet?
06/11/09
06/11/09
06/11/09
06/11/09
06/11/09
06/11/09
Too bad that douche Chris Hardwick took what you said about AT&T and just said it himself that punk. You need to borrow Jesus' iron bar.
06/11/09
06/11/09
06/11/09
06/11/09
06/11/09
06/11/09
06/09/09
Apple isn't keeping their pros in mind anymore. and it kind of sucks.
06/09/09
06/09/09
06/09/09
Right now there are 5 separate models of the Macbook Pro, but only ONE Macbook - the white one.
That seems very very odd to me. Very unbalanced.
Maybe they are making a netbook-type thing to appeal to the downmarket in a recession, and they plan on smacking this with a Macbook labal.
This is probably them just setting themselves up for future product releases. Remember that 10 in tablet rumor?
06/09/09
When the economy was going gangbusters, having products that showcased who was "da boss" made business sense, as we lived in a time where people had cash to burn and could not only afford to buy products that screamed out "elite" but wanted those products and were willing to pay through the nose for them. Now that the world is full of poors (TM Gawker), it makes sense to showcase your products as being something that has elite-level capabilities but is affordable to the proletariat. Look, now any schmo can afford an iPhone that looks just like the fancy ones Wall Street suits have (or had before their companies went under)! Hey, now I can have the same kind of MacBook the professionals use!
06/09/09
06/09/09
And beyond that, nobody thinks anyone is cool because of the laptop they use, period.
06/09/09
06/09/09
06/09/09
i in fact haven't, and i take that your mentioning it as high praise. i'm very content having a few miles between myself and anyone who DOES base their opinion of someone on their laptop of choice.
sad thing is, i know for a fact that i'd get mountains of poontang if only i had a ferarri and a bunch of 'fuck you' money. my self imposed image of poverty precludes romps with such shallow, worthless people, which is a good thing on the one hand but uh... it's a little taxing on the other one.